Hello Everyone,

I don't want to be that guy but there are a lot of threads regarding the pending gun laws on the magazine ban. Can someone fill me in on which stage we are at? Thank you for your help!

We are in the Bend Over stage. Many things pending, nothing cancelled.

We are in the Bend Over stage. Many things pending, nothing cancelled.

lmao. that was funny.

We'll get to the "insert mag" stage soon enough!

We are in the stage where the only sane course of action is to get the fuck out of New Jersey. 

We are in the stage where the only sane course of action is to get the fuck out of New Jersey.

RIF!

 

 

Sent from my iPad 2 using T2 Pro

So does that mean the 15 round pistol magazine is still good? Because I can't find anything that's up to date about the ban...

So does that mean the 15 round pistol magazine is still good? Because I can't find anything that's up to date about the ban...

 

 

Yep.... nothing has changed

Ok, cool....though I am far from surprised nothing has changed.

it may help you to find the thread or threads directly relating to the pending legislation and follow them. You can also go on the NJ leg website and get email updates on specific bills if you desire

 

So does that mean the 15 round pistol magazine is still good? Because I can't find anything that's up to date about the ban...

 

 

Now? Yes. But check back hourly for mag limit updates.

"Gun Laws - Where are we at?"

 

Can the OP please edit this title and take out the "at"? It irritates me every time I read it.

 

"Gun Laws - Where are we at?"

 

Can the OP please edit this title and take out the "at"? It irritates me every time I read it.

You do know the customary answer to that objection, right?

 

"OK, Gun Laws - Where are we at, Motherf^%*&^!!!"

"Gun Laws - Where are we at?"

 

 

Can the OP please edit this title and take out the "at"? It irritates me every time I read it.

Quite right. The correct syntax is either:

Where we at

Or

Where are we

Or is this case simply

WTF

 

"Gun Laws - Where are we at?"

 

Can the OP please edit this title and take out the "at"? It irritates me every time I read it.

 

That's right. You should never end a sentence with a preposition. It should read "Gun Laws -- At Which Are We?

That's right. You should never end a sentence with a preposition. It should read "Gun Laws -- At Which Are We?

 

Huh?

 

It is a simple deletion > "Gun Laws - Where are we?" Say it emphasizing the "are".

 

"Gun Laws - Where are we at?"

 

Can the OP please edit this title and take out the "at"? It irritates me every time I read it.

 

 

Agreed, nails on chalkboard.

That's right. You should never end a sentence with a preposition. It should read "Gun Laws -- At Which Are We?

With apologies to Winston Churchill, that preposition rule is one up with which we should not put.

Now that the bill passed through on Monday does this mean this bill will go next to Christie?

Now that the bill passed through on Monday does this mean this bill will go next to Christie?

It has to be voted and passed by the whole Senate first. Assuming they vote on party lines without any thought as usual it is just a matter of time.

 

Sent from my SCH-I800 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

It has to be voted and passed by the whole Senate first. Assuming they vote on party lines without any thought as usual it is just a matter of time.

 

 

One other step after this, before CC's desk, perhaps.  Either house would have to pass the other's Bill (Assm. would have to pass S993, or Sen. would have to pass A2006), or they go to a conference committee to draft a unified bill which both houses could pass.

 

*Then* it goes to CC's desk.

One other step after this, before CC's desk, perhaps.  Either house would have to pass the other's Bill (Assm. would have to pass S993, or Sen. would have to pass A2006), or they go to a conference committee to draft a unified bill which both houses could pass.

 

*Then* it goes to CC's desk.

 

If both bills are identical there's no need to do this. I believe they are. 

If both bills are identical there's no need to do this. I believe they are. 

 

Fair enough. I'd think both houses still need to pass one of the bills (as a parliamentary formality), but having both identical certainly makes it easier/faster.

I love the way politicians think.  Lets see If we reduce a six pack of beer down to a four pack, we would be saving lives..    

I love the way politicians think.  Lets see If we reduce a six pack of beer down to a four pack, we would be saving lives.. 

 

I WILL NOT COMPLY!!!

I WILL NOT COMPLY!!!

Then go out and buy a bunch of 30 round mags and start bringing them to the range on a regular basis.

 

Post pics here or it didn't happen.

 

Give me a break.

Then go out and buy a bunch of 30 round mags and start bringing them to the range on a regular basis.

 

Post pics here or it didn't happen.

 

Give me a break.

I think he's talking about the six packs

I think he's talking about the six packs

I are dumb. And prejudiced. Please Pile-On (PPO)

 

I deserve a few broken beer bottle lumps.