From the Forbes article linked above.  You'd think that any rational person would agree. 

 

"The few who attained permits had to beg, plead and show imminent danger to their lives through restraining orders and other legal documentation before Sheriff Gore was compelled to bequeath a woman being stalked or some other unfortunate person their right to bear arms.

 

Imagine if a local sheriff or other official was permitted to treat other constitutionally protected rights this way. Could a police officer search your home without a warrant if you don’t have some state documentation showing you particularly need your Fourth Amendment rights? Could a district attorney require you to testify against yourself unless you somehow proved to their satisfaction that you really, really need your Fifth Amendment rights? This treatment of the U.S. Bill of Rights obviously doesn’t even pass the laugh test."

If he likes that, he should see Jersey!

San Diego sounds like Jersey.  I'd bet that local Pols in SD County have no trouble at all getting CCW permits.  Just like Jersey.

Dispicable, Disturbing, Disgusting.

 

That about describes NJ's hughest court, or basically the whole judicial branch.

 

Vomit inducing SHAM.

Short answer:  "No".  The Supreme Court is done with the Second Amendment, of that I'm certain.