Answer yes. When they contact you for more info give them a list of 200 things like proctalgia fugax, tinea pedis, rhinovirus, etc. It will give them something to do looking it all up.

Town is Middlesex Borough -- It's a new chief of barely 6 months and he is not anti gun --  I know him personally

 

He's making a lot of changes in town for the better -- I'm sure this one will get addressed too

 

My point to this whole post was that question needs to be more specific -- The way it's worded makes it a very general question that can't be answered No truthfully in my eyes

 

 I just wanted to see what you guys thought

 

that is whats wrong with everyone in this state - Your point should have been to point out that no other states require such ridiculous crap

It's not who I use as a reference that bothers me. What I have a problem with is the employer and their people.  At one employer, the blabber mouth secretary in the HR department told everyone she saw I was buying a gun and don't piss me off.  Well that led to a formal complaint with HR that did not go over well.  That is why I do not want the background check to state what my business is with the PD.

 

Again, no other states require this crap

The disclosure of employer information on the STS-033 (application) is ONLY for the police to verify your employment and nothing more. PD's that disclose the reason for the verification or use your employer as a defacto reference are abusing the process and should be reported to the ANJRPC. If you suffer damages because of it (i.e.loss of job or standing) you should bring suit against the PD.

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

Unemployed people are not aloud to purchase/own firearms?

 

Employment is none of their business, period.

Hunter is correct

I second that. Isnt this the only state that does it this way? To this extent!!!

Employer? Whats that?.....(inner city joke)

 

could Trayvon list this as his employment?

Question #25 - Proof that you do not have a sister:    Document must be notarized and attached.