Older son was living in hoboken

Yep, as was Adam's father

Ah.. But research some aviation lawsuits.

Doctor flies his Beech Bonanza into a thunderstorm. Exceed load limits by way of speed/bank.. Plane suffers structural damage. Doctor and plane land on earth...separately. Family of asshat that flew into a thunderstorm sues Beech and wins.

To borrow a phrase..the product worked as designed. It withstood the stresses it was designed to stand, but failed beyond those limits. The operator however failed to operate the aircraft as required by procedures established by the manufacturer.

There are many others that are even more egregious in the aviation industry.

For a long time, and maybe still, a third of the cost of a new plane is product liability insurance. Its why my $60k plane costs $550k new.

The issue? Judges are clueless about aviation. So they allow huge deference to those suing Aviation companies. If these sorts of "gun" lawsuits do not get dismissed, we will see that same thing in the firearms industry.

File this one under effing ridiculous.http://www.aopa.org/News-and-Video/All-News/1993/December/1/Pilot-Counsel-(11)

They did change the liability laws a few years ago to offer some protection to manufacturers, but it's still ridiculous. A crash cause by pilot error and they sue the aircraft manufacturer, the engine manufacturer and anyone else they can. Even the flight instructor who taught the pilot 15 years earlier.

 

Nothing personal against the lawyers on this site, but many lawyers are ambulance chasing low-life scumbags. We need loser pays to stop the ridiculous, frivolous lawsuits.

Yep, as was Adam's father

There was a person with the same name as the brother, who was originally thought to be the bomber, that lived in Atco. He bought a firearm from me. Imagine what went through my mind for that first hour or so.

 

Sent from an undisclosed location via Tapatalk.

There was a person with the same name as the brother, who was originally thought to be the bomber, that lived in Atco. He bought a firearm from me. Imagine what went through my mind for that first hour or so.

Sent from an undisclosed location via Tapatalk.

that must have sucked

They did change the liability laws a few years ago to offer some protection to manufacturers, but it's still ridiculous. A crash cause by pilot error and they sue the aircraft manufacturer, the engine manufacturer and anyone else they can. Even the flight instructor who taught the pilot 15 years earlier.

Nothing personal against the lawyers on this site, but many lawyers are ambulance chasing low-life scumbags. We need loser pays to stop the ridiculous, frivolous lawsuits.

Agree.

 

Do you recall the lawsuit where a guy lost control in a thunderstorm and his estate sued the magneto manufacturer? Slick...or its parent. Bendix I think. Unreal.

 

And thats my concern with this nonsense. I think this case will eventually get the boot. But more effed up thinks have happened when the D's run the judiciary.

Older son was living in hoboken

Ah... Ok. Thanks.

Thnx Krdshrk.

 

Here's my comment from that thread.

 

=======

Foxnews.com Article

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/04/15/judge-rules-newtown-families-lawsuit-against-gun-makers-can-go-forward.html?intcmp=hpbt3

 

I'd expect this to be dismissed at some point based on the Protect of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act as the article references.  But... it should be dismissed because Remington had nothing to do with it. Adam Lanza, that sick #@$&^ killed those people.

 

The article also said this...

 

Judge Bellis ruled Thursday that argument would be best made in a motion later in the process and is not grounds to dismiss the lawsuit.

 

Which might be good in that he may think it has no ground but better ruled on elsewhere. Not sure.  Maybe the legal dudes can comment.

 

But...there's a disturbing trend on the left.  They are also suing Exxon Moblile for failure to warn the public that their products cause Climate Change.  The left loves to govern by the court system.

 

This crap has to stop.

 

Not that I would agree with this, but a lawsuit against the school district in Newtown for failing to protect their students and staff would be less ridiculous than suing Remington.  Kind of like Charles Manson was less crazy than Ted Bundy.

 

If this somehow goes forward and they win..... we have a big problem.

 

Let's sue the sun and the moon as well!  They cause climate change!!  We can't have any climate change dammit!  Ever. 

They have FPID's in Connecticut? That friggen sucks.

I work with several people from Connecticut.  Trying to tell one of my coworkers to get his pistol permit.  I think they are firggin' worse than NJ.  Hard to believe.  I briefly looked at their requirements and it will cost about $150-$200 to get a pistol. 

 

$70 permit fee (though it is good for 5 years) BUT  you MUST take a handgun safety course ($100-$125),

 

"You are required to complete a handgun safety course, which must consist of no less than the NRA's "Basic Pistol Course," prior to submitting the application. The NRA's "Home Firearms Safety Course" and "First Steps Pistol Orientation Program" are not approved courses"

 

http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?a=4213&q=494614

I have had this argument with several people who agree with this retarded idea. This thought process is like saying if Budweiser legally sells beer to a liquor store and an person of legal age legally purchases beer and then drinks and drives subsequently killing someone Budweiser should be held responsible ....... How or why in the F% is that Budweisers fault or problem.....People have to be held responsible for THEIR OWN actions not everyone else

I have had this argument with several people who agree with this retarded idea. This thought process is like saying if Budweiser legally sells beer to a liquor store and an person of legal age legally purchases beer and then drinks and drives subsequently killing someone Budweiser should be held responsible ....... How or why in the F&#% is that Budweisers fault or problem.....People have to be held responsible for THEIR OWN actions not everyone else

It has nothing to do with money.

 

In the late 90s early 2000s cities started suing gun manufacturers and FFLs for political purposes. To hurt them and/or drive them out of business.

 

If we played these games by the rules the left does, half of them would be dead by the end of the week and the other half would be in jail.

 

I have a video of a commercial from 2000 about this, less than 2 MB, but I can't get the darn thing to upload anywhere. .mov filetype.

It has nothing to do with money.

 

In the late 90s early 2000s cities started suing gun manufacturers and FFLs for political purposes. To hurt them and/or drive them out of business.

 

If we played these games by the rules the left does, half of them would be dead by the end of the week and the other half would be in jail.

 

I have a video of a commercial from 2000 about this, less than 2 MB, but I can't get the darn thing to upload anywhere. .mov filetype.

I didn't mention it being about money and agree with you Mipa....It is all about they're ultimate agenda to take all guns away.