RadioGunner

YouTube is such trash clickbait these days

Law enforcement has training to spot concealed guns. The NYPD's training is quite comprehensive. I've seen it. In the era of stop and frisk some were very skilled at spotting weapons. And some would stop and frisk you anyway even if all they had was a "hunch." Personally I don't want to have to walk around worrying about whether the cops will see me if I reach for something on a shelf and my shirt lifts and exposes the gun.

Not the range, but there is a woman who was stopped and arrested with an unloaded gun in her trunk going from Pennsylvania to her second house in NJ. She stopped to text her girlfriend (i.e. obey the law) and the cop pulled up behind her, spotted a loose round in the car and then got arrested. The woman above and also Brian Aitken. The problem is if you ever have to use it, it will go from being a clean, self defense shoot to a gun crime. This guy had multiple issues: https://www.silive.com/crime-safety/2022/12/gun-nj-transit-driver-from-si-used-to-shoot-teen-had-extended-clip-authorities-allege-records-show-old-arrests-on-si.html But the shoot itself was not the issue.

The premises license is also green. They are all possession licenses and technically the premises and target/sport is a restriction. And let's not forget that there are MANY who think that ONLY the police should have guns. Especially the higher ups.

The problem is that breaking even the slightest gun law is a 2nd degree crime now. And then there’s the graves act with it’s mandatory minimums. You have a few who were made examples of - Shaneen Allen, Brian Aitken, Gregg Revell, Meg Fellenbaum. So the fear is indeed justified. And I am sure it’s this way by design.

You have to register to vote and felons can’t vote.

You are.

Speech is not an absolute right either.

A right is not absolute. For example, you have the right to freedom of religion but not to human sacrifice. Heller and Bruen state that quote plainly.

I’m in favor of mandatory objective training requirements to carry. I do not support permitless carry. If you’re carrying a weapon in public, if you are shooting a threat that shouldn’t be the first time you are firing your gun. That’s my opinion, and whether or not it’s supported by history I don’t know. That said, Clement didn’t contest that in the oral arguments in Bruen and the decision was silent about it.

Many of those states have limits on where you can carry without a permit, which is a proxy for banning carry in these places without training. Texas for example has a pretty long list of places where you can’t carry without a LTC

Have to wonder why some people are so anti training to carry. Then again I see people who “passed” qualifications with 80% looking like they shot the target with a shotgun and then some who failed. One guy came to the qual with no ears on, RSO only found out after the first round. Lol.

No. Well-regulated means well-trained, well-equipped. Gun advocacy groups tend to agree on that point. And from the NY cases that point has stuck.

Objective standards are allowed under the bruen decision. I think it would be hard for example for them to make us qualify harder than retired cops (who are civilians), for example.

LOL. Nah, I don't have to prove anything to you.

I really don't see a problem with Kavanaugh's comments. I think that in NJ and similar states that permitless carry is a pipe dream. Background checks and reasonable training aren't really a high bar.

Sure, they will. And then it will get appealed to the third circuit. There is a very good chance we will get a pro 2A judge to rule in our favor. But the state is desperately asking for consolidation, because they want this case in front of Williams, who is a Biden appointee. They may get the TRO denied but that victory will be short lived for them. WE are seeing the worst case play out in NY right now. NY has appealed to the supreme court. Their justice is Sotomayor. She can say no and they can just move to the next one. One of the 6 will grant the TRO and it's all over. It may take a few months, but it will happen.

No, that is very shallow thinking. Murphy, who is really just a proxy for Bloomberg is openly defying the Supreme Court. He and the legislature aren't really shy about it either. No matter what any decision said, they would still have made this brazen attempt to defy the decision.

Yes, Bruen is different. Thanks to Trump, we now have a solid pro 2A majority. We did not have that before. We had 5-4 which was really 4-4 with a swing vote (Kennedy). Now we have 6-3 which could be 5-4 in some cases. They will either do it at the last minute or ask for an extension.

Nichols was a crazy case from the land of fruits and nuts. There, I said it. Heller gave us quite a few wins nationwide. Look at the bigger picture - DC and Chicago went from no guns allowed to full on concealed carry. It laid the foundation for Bruen which gave us carry here. San Francisco tried to ban guns in public housing. They folded. We even got stun guns and tasers, and it laid the foundation for Bruen, which gave us concealed carry. And yes, NJ decided to fight back against us, but they will lose. Trust me, they will lose and lose pretty hard.

The directive says they'll be issued by the PD.

The insurance requirement isn't effect yet. It really doesn't burden anyone at this time. It will burden people come July. We have plenty of time. The sensitive places restriction is more immediate.

It seems like this will be moved very quickly. Remember when Obergefell was decided there were still holdouts like Kim Davis, and even though she tried her best, she was dealt with, and even served jail time and eventually lost her re-election.

The most immediate problem is the sensitive places, that causes immediate harm (for those of us that have carry permits). That's what the FPC case is challenging. Those other requirements will be challenged in Siegel v Platkin, the ANJRPC case which seems to have a more drawn out timeline but is much more comprehensive. But actually the hearing is scheduled for the 9th for that case so it may not even be that far behind. It's really just strategy. Attack the low hanging fruit first. Get relief for the most egregious restrictions (sensitive places) then work on the rest. The training and insurance don't even take effect until July anyway.

He’s also had a massive target on his back. People dox him with impunity and cut off their nose to spite their face and throw all sorts of crap at him. Yes he has a business, so what? I thought conservatives were in favor of capitalism?