Chad

30 round magazines are plentiful at gun shows in PA. DISCLAIMER: You are legally allowed to purchase 30 round magazines in PA. You are NOT allowed to posess them in NJ :naughty: . Be sure to do the modifying in PA. Before the magazine(s) is/are transported over state lines it MUST not be capable of accepting more than 15 rounds. Be guided accordingly. Good luck.

app story here JACKSON

lol...no sweat! Maybe we sat next to each other on that small yellow bus?? haha, we did go to different high schools together yanno.

Dude, that was yesterday,....you expect me to remember back that far??? I think the point I was making is that I didn't want you to think I was serious about not keeping ammo/guns for HD.

Abolutely

lol....I was thinking the same thing. But hindsight is always 20/20 I guess.

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=655

I keep my car keys on my nightstand so I can scratch the attacker in the face....that is what the anti-gun folks recomend you do isn't it? :roll:

I believe chris rock said it best...something to the effect of, "I don't need to work out, I have guns"

xanax.

Home invasion just occured in Manalapan. This one probably will not make the news. No injuries, nothing taken. Two males entered the house, and homeowner scared them away. Most likely thought noone was home.

I resent that statement. My camaro never ran over anyone. =) My guns have never killed anyone Certainly less than Ted Kennedy's car has. errrrra errrrrra

Original Story Man Fired For Looking At Gun Web Sites It's not unusual for employees to be fired for browsing pornographic Web sites at work. But a Pennsylvania gun owner named Tony Jackson may have been the first person ever fired for looking at Web sites featuring gun parts. Jackson worked at a Lotus Notes administrator at Planco, a subsidiary of Hartford, Conn.-based insurance company The Hartford. He's a firearms instructor and self-described Second Amendment advocate who, while at work in May 2007, visited Web sites including shotgun maker Mossberg and Impact Guns's online store because he and his wife were planning on going skeet shooting and she needed a replacement part for her shotgun. When Jackson was searching the Web for a replacement shotgun stock, supervisor Christie Vazquez -- who admitted in a subsequent deposition to being "very anti-gun" and had quarreled with him before about politics -- noticed what he was doing. Vazquez said she was scared because it was only a few weeks after the Virginia Tech massacre (see CBS News video), so she promptly reported her colleague's Web browsing to Planco's human resources department. Vazquez also informed the HR department that Jackson owned guns and was a member of the National Rifle Association. You can guess what happened next: according to court documents, the HR representative, Jamie Davis, replied that reporting the visits to Mossberg.com and other sites was "the right thing" to do, and ordered the information technology department to investigate Jackson's Internet activity. After receiving a list of Web sites visited, Davis recommended that Jackson be placed on leave, which the company authorized. Planco disabled Jackson's front door and computer access and arranged for undercover police to be at the building the next morning. (A side note: Jackson suffered a heart attack and stroke in January 2006, and was on medical leave for three months as a result. Later that year, his annual review from Vazquez said he worked hard but did not meet expectations, a conclusion that Jackson believes arose from discrimination relating to his decision to take medical leave. In fact, just a few weeks before the gun-Web-site incident, Jackson told HR he believed the unflattering review was a response to his medical condition.) There is no evidence that Jackson was a violent person, and Davis later acknowledged that the list of Web sites were shopping sites that didn't have any violent pictures or anything that alarmed her. Nevertheless, Vazquez and another supervisor claimed they were concerned for their safety, and Planco fired Jackson six days later. In October 2008, Jackson filed a lawsuit against Planco in federal district court in Philadelphia alleging that the gun-Web-site issue was a transparent pretext to fire him because of his medical condition. The lawsuit, filed by Exton, Penn. attorney Mark Scheffer, noted that Jackson and supervisor Vazquez had -- at least at one point -- enjoyed a friendly relationship. Jackson, who has a legal concealed carry permit in Pennsylvania, accompanied Vazquez when she was hunting for apartments in dodgy areas of Philadelphia. He gave her a tour of the Philadelphia Inquirer, where he used to work, and took Vazquez to a shooting range and showed her how to use a gun. (She confirmed in a later deposition (PDF) that she enjoyed the outing.) Another employee who worked in the same department said he heard Vazquez ask Jackson about purchasing a handgun for protection. Planco's response to the lawsuit, outlined in a 31-page legal brief (PDF), is simple: it had "legitimate concerns about employee safety" because "Jackson, an admitted gun enthusiast who owns a sizable gun collection, including an Uzi," was browsing gun-related Web sites. Planco said its managers decided to fire Jackson, who has "an apparent fascination with guns," rather than "risk the potential safety of other Planco employees." (On the other hand, why would Planco's supervisors, all of whom knew that Jackson was a gun aficionado, suddenly be alarmed merely because they noticed he was shopping for replacement gun parts? Especially when one went shooting with him outside of work hours and enjoyed it?) Planco also argued that Jackson violated the company's Internet policy (PDF), which would normally block access to gun-related Web sites through filtering software, by visiting them when the filter was down for maintenance. The policy broadly prohibits accessing "offensive" or "inappropriate" material, but doesn't mention gun sites; Jackson says the policy didn't apply to sites like Mossberg.com, and notes that plenty visits by other employees to non-work related Web sites went unpunished. On September 29, U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell agreed with Planco and granted the company summary judgement, saying there wasn't enough evidence that Jackson suffered unlawful discrimination. "Jackson has not met his burden of showing that a discriminatory reason more likely motivated Planco," Dalzell wrote. On Wednesday, I sent this note to Tim Benedict, the director of media relations at Planco's parent company, The Hartford: Planco's policy says employees may not visit "inappropriate" web sites, but does not explicitly list gun sites as off-limits. Nevertheless, Jackon's at-work web browsing (he was shopping for firearms, apparently) alarmed co-workers and prompted him to be fired in May 2007. So I guess my questions to you are these: Does Planco/The Hartford believe employees should be fired if they visit gun sites at work? How about other time-wasting sites not relevant to work, like ESPN.com or Facebook? Benedict replied on Thursday afternoon, pointing me to Planco's legal briefs and saying "I can't comment beyond that." If any readers know more about Planco's and The Hartford's Internet policies, I'd love to hear about it.

You woke up this morning. Got yourself a gun....... Pizzaland...belleville tpk, north arlington.

Can't go wrong with a Smith & Wesson revolver...many models to choose from and a very solid gun. Used worldwide for home protection.

http://www.app.com/article/20091008/NEW ... er-suicide LEBANON, PA.

NOT an LEO. Anywhere unusual you can think of to hide it is probably where they are going to be looking for jewlery/cash etc. You should look into a small gun cabinet and lag bolt it to the floor/wall. They take whatever they want, I don't think anyone wastes their time cutting alarm wires, and who knows if they come back. VERY few IMO bother with this. Believe it or not having an alarm company sign out front and the little stickers on the windows WILL deter most of the random junkie burglars. They;ll go for what seems more easy pickings. MOST of them unless they have a lot of time in the house arent going to look too closely, they'll go for bedroom drawers, and exposed jewelry boxes, and electronics, especially computers and game systems, anything that can be scooped up quickly. My suggestion, would be to put something like the shotgun mounts we use in the cars over your door, it can be easily locked when you're out of the house, and this way it'll be secure. Article in todays APP... http://www.app.com/article/20091006/NEW ... hone+lines Police say Manalapan burglar cut phone lines MANALAPAN

:oops:

AIM?

Are they pro-gun or anti-gun? Whatever the case, I doubt they will do anything. Maybe you'll get the typical political response of , "I will have my office look into that for you" or "I will have to see whats gonig on with that issue"

Are you really going to walk away from your dog being attacked by an animal to go call animal control? 1) animal control will NOT respond unless the animal is contained. 2) animal control usually has a minimum of a 30 min response time. Many people seem to be hung up on the "how do you know it has rabies", so lets change things up a bit. My small 10lb dog is being attacked by a possum. Can I shoot the possum? I guess it still goes back to discharging a firearm within city limits. Doesn't matter what your shooting/defending or even what sickness one animal has (rabies) .

+ 1 on watches. Art as well.

Good idea....I will be picking a pair up for my kit. They sound useful.

its illegal to grill on your boat? Well, if its something you caught, yes. Prove it tho...yanno? I will find the actual law, but it is something about not cleaning, gutting, cooking fish on board if they were caught the same day. Same with using the fluke stomach for bait, thats a no no also...but, you can always just go 3 miles out into international waters and the whole jurisdiction things plays a role...bla bla bla. SCALLOPS ARE THE BEST! As long as they are not sandy....yukkk