DirtyDigz

I'm here as well - jeans, blue plaid-ish button down shirt, carrying a black computer bag. Say hi if you recognize me.

Yup - FID and DL addresses matching is something some FFL's **choose** to require. It is not required by law. Some enlightened FFL's do not have the matching address requirement. I wouldn't hesitate to do a Private sale with someone who's addresses didn't match.

I can tell you Chatham is friendly based on recent experience. You'll have to make an appointment to see the Detective who handles firearms, but once the appointment is done they move (relatively) quickly.

John, yes I did, the picture above is the set I purchased from Op-For weapons via facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OPFORWEAPONS/ After I purchased from Op-For, I also saw an ad from Duke Museum of Military History selling a similar set: https://www.facebook.com/dukemuseumofmilitaryhistory/

As much as it pains me to say it..... RayRay was right. *spit*

Wow, this is way better than a typical "found an old safe/trap door" in the new house threads. I did remove the plastic caps last night and

Construction may have pre-dated availability of PVC pipe. I'll try removing the caps tonight and see what I see.

Concrete block. That's the inside of an exterior wall. I think there's a splinter of plywood lifted up at the top that is giving the illusion of a space/compartment behind it.

Constructed mid-70's. Hot/cold water supply and drain makes sense, and would be awesome - Would be great to put a sink there.

WTF are these?:

9 month update - I haven't received anything mailed in months. Applied for, was approved for and closed on a mortgage/home purchase. Credit score was still over 800 last time the lender shared it with me. So far MD has been all bark and zero bite.

Really capt14k? That's what you chose to do with your Saturday night, research mud to sling at a guy who's trying to help all of us? Maybe the case is legit, maybe it isn't, but I do know that SAPPA is trying to help the NJ RKBA cause. If you're not going to support them, at least leave them alone.

I'll be getting into reloading. Having a belt fed 7.62x51 rifle that is fun to shoot compels it.

Wow - that's about half off "normal" pricing...

+1 on Smith Optics Aegis - they're about the best you can do for protective eyewear that still fits in a pocket. If you're patient you can find them for closer to $30. I read the lucky gunner eyewear article several years ago. Ever since then I will only wear single lens eye pro.

SCOTUS said you can't ban them outright. They didn't say anything about background checks/permits before purchase, restricted/no carry, restrictions on power output etc. etc. I want them to be unrestricted, I'm hoping they'll stay essentially unrestricted, but I think you're too sanguine if you think the laws will stay as currently proposed.

They can craft whatever restrictions they want outside of an outright ban and wait for the next governor. There's nothing preventing them from enacting legislation after October.

Once we see how the final regulations are going to play out. However, since an outright prohibition is now out the window, I will be picking up some stun guns (not tasers - those should be legal to posses in NJ too, but I'm just not interested in them) next time I'm traveling through a state that sells them.

The legislature does not have to accept the NJSP's proposed rules as they are currently. They can change them/propose additional legislation to make them more restrictive. I've seen one legislator on facebook already squealing that they are too permissive and he will, at minimum, raise the age to 21.

So the NJSP is out with *proposed* (I say again - PROPOSED - these are *NOT* law yet) stun gun regulations: http://www.njsp.org/news/pdf/pr/20170821_2765a.pdf My take - the only proposed regulation is that you have to be 18 or older to possess one. Nothing about exempted locations/transportaiton, purchase permit, registration, etc. Just have to be 18 to possess, otherwise subject to confiscation. The Democrat legislators aren't going to like this...

As usual in the era of clickbait "news" stories meets gnat-level attention spans, the whole story has not been communicated:

"Gubernatorial candidate Phil Murphy has pledged in his campaign that "All gun sales should be subject to a tax that will fund law enforcement, drug treatment centers, and mental health services." Has the NJSP advised Mr. Murphy or his campaign on any aspect of this proposed tax?" "Gubernatorial candidate Phil Murphy has pledged in his campaign that he "...would require individuals to register their firearms kept in the state." Can you speculate on how a mandatory registration system for all firearms kept in NJ would be implemented and enforced?"

"Can you give us any color into how NJ is considering regulating stun guns after the recent consent decree removing their complete ban? Has the NJSP been asked for input on any pending regulations? We understand the 180 day period for NJ to come up with new regulations is coming to an end in October."

Rosey - I agree that it's already been answered "anecdotally" based on the experience of a few, but I'd really like an answer direct from a representative of the NJSP "on the record" - ideally video recorded and put up on youtube. I think seeing that would do more to dispell the fear of getting denied for CCW than hearing anecdotally about "a couple of guys had no problem". I agree that a coordinated "apply to be denied" effort would blow a big hole in NJ's defense the next time they have to testify in a court action about what % of CCW applications are granted.