bulpup

You're missing my point. Advertising yes, but it isn't just "posted to YouTube," it is hosted on Youtube for use on their website. Marketing, advertising. Capitalism. If these are real drills that they run then, there they are, on display. Rest assured I see your point. Flashy and trashy to get the gomers to drop some cash and train with the SEALS. But this is a video the assumes the viewer is a pro that wants to get better. That's why I am making a point to say that it was meant to be shown on their website, not just "posted on Youtube." Its just how media works. Free video hosting on YT is embedable on the webpage, yet also searchable on youtube. Personally, I think if some "mall Ninja," wants to drop some cash for this kind of training then more power to them. At least it is proper training. If they are going to do it at home then let them shoot themselves. Stupid is as stupid does.

The purpose is advertising, but not just via youtube surfing. Although this video was likley found by clicking on a linked video when watching youtube or as a result of a youtube search, the people that made that video are selling their training. First, click the name of the "person" that uploaded the video and you get this. ADE Youtube channel Or follow the link in the video http://americandefenseenterprises.com Notice the video that opens right on the home page. Here's the thing, just because it was found on youtube doesn't mean it was created simply to be "surfed" to on Youtube. Youtube is a free video hosting service and people use it embed video on their own websites. In other words, If a company wants to make a webpage to bring in customers but doesn't want to spend the cash to have a dedicated host server, they upload to youtube and then embed in their webpage. voila http://www.americandefenseenterprises.com/videos.htm Then when you look at their webpage and their hosted video you see this; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9wZzx58mTE SO, we in the forum arrived at the video by some random search, but the intention of the video was likely meant to be included in their website as a first priority, found on youtube as a tertiary. Class dismissed

Looks like well trained people training for combat and to work as a team. Whats the issue? You think these guys never practiced live fire drills like that?

This sentiment is exactly why I bought the single stage first.

couldn't get to the range. oh well. I like the lemishine idea though.

Because "supermen" are still mortal. We should be heartened by the fact that they win more than they lose, but there is always 'the odds.'

Hey. Bought some of the Winchester WSF. Meters very nicely. I qm going to try some Rainer lead safe flat tips I loaded tomorrow.

Keeping it fresh could mean a super model shoot out?

Excellent, thanks for the feedback.

videos play too?

<link removed> I am just wondering what you cen view here without logging in.

C-17, my favorite aircraft. Wasn't always but it flew me home from Iraq, so now I love it

Swatting trend Nice. Just imagine yourself.....

As I mentioned earlier, and now appears to be supported, open carry of an unloaded pisol, as a law, is foolish and dangerous and as smokin' says, a complete waste of police resources. This is because the police have to approach an individual openly carrying to verify if the firearms is unloaded and therefore legal whenever called. It is a flawed law the way CA has it.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_definition_of_being_detained_by_a_police_officer

I believe in this case the law itself is the issue. The difference between loaded or unloaded makes the carry of the firearm illegal. I don't know what happens if he is found to have it loaded, but lets just imagine it is a felony; this means the condition of the firearm is the legal issue. A person calling about it couldn't possible know if the handgun is loaded or not, so the police will have a duty to check.

Well put. We all have rights, but the officer's job is to check out calls to the police. There is no way of knowing if the people that called said "there is a man with a gun walking down the street," or "there is a man with an unloaded pistol in a holster on his belt," but if you had to bet, which one is the most likely? Just as a caller could say " there is a man with a green gym bag that may have taken something from a person's car." Of course the cops are going to want to ask that guy something.

I believe when it says squirrel and rifle it means muzzle loader. I say I believe because I only saw that woodchuck says .22 is allowed.

The thing of it is, I first saw that video when I was allowed to audit a class given to the NYPD about how to be a good cop. They gave that trooper a 100% fail rating and thats because of a number of things. for instance, littering? Make the guy get out of the car twice? Explaining how to put a stamp on an envelope? The calm is condescending. you can act calm and still be an ashole.

yas massa

I love that cop. Not sure I understand why he wouldn't give his name, but I guess in states where you can open carry people know the issue a little better.

I agree. As usefull as this is to CCW advocates, it is also very good at showing police what is downright wrong and unacceptable behaviour. Have you guys seen this video?

Can you imagine people protesting over this guy? 30 or so people in jail in police brutality protest over this guy.