Shane45

THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP!

Yeah but they would be rather...floppy wouldnt they?

Just one excerpt. If you hit google you will find a ton.

March 4, 2009 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Stacy James, et al., NO. C 05-04532 JW Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR JUDGMENT DEBTOR Ignatius A. Piazza, et al., EXAMINATION; REFERRING PARTIES TO SPECIAL MASTER Defendants. / Stacy James, William Haag and Michael Schriber initiated this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Ignatius A. Piazza and Front Sight Management, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants operate gun training facilities in Nevada and Alaska under the name “Front Sight Firearms Training Institute” (“Front Sight”). Plaintiffs’ claims related to memberships purchased from Defendants that, among other benefits, gave Plaintiffs the right to participate in various Front Sight training courses. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants engaged in fraud, breach of contract, and other violations of state and federal law in connection with their Front Sight memberships. On October 15, 2007, the Court issued its Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal in this case in light of the parties’ settlement. (Docket Item No. 142.) Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce Settlement. (hereafter, “Motion,” Docket Item No. 152.) In their Motion, Plaintiffs seek the following relief: (1) An order compelling judgment debtors’ examinations; (2) production of Defendants’ financial documents; (3) injunctive relief relating to Defendants’ alleged violation of the Settlement Agreement; and (4) payment of the Settlement Claims Administrator’s fees. (Motion at 1-2.) Defendants contend that they are excused from performance on the Settlement, because Plaintiffs are in material breach of the Settlement. (Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce Settlement at 5-6, hereafter, “Opposition,” Docket Item No. 158.) The Court addresses each issue in turn. (continue reading at site)

Just a heads up. I believe you meed molle gear to connect these to.

After speaking to a few former FS alumni and reviewing some of their teachings, all I can say is NO THANKS! There are MANY quality training facilities around the country, why go with the one with a big giant dark cloud hanging over it?

BRN169, I see where you are coming from but I think that NJ may have been passed over NRA style if it were not for the efforts of in state organizations.

My next knife will likely be a Strider

Your previous post.

Well, that seems to be the case with the Van Drew bill. However, its the opinion of most in the know that the staunch resistance in NJ gov despite the facts will doom ANY bill. Legal action is our only hope for legal change in anything resembling a reasonable time frame. BRN169, Im not clear on the point your making. To all, its a subject best left alone...... for now.

Having handled both, I prefer the feel of the SCAR by far. I have not fired an ACR so I cant compare there but I can say I very much like how the SCAR shoots.

If anyone wants to add me just send me a pm too with your tag. FOr some reason I get a ton of requests but only add ones I know. Wolfy its basically no perks, no attachments.

Make a knife that wont break so easily, you usually give up edge holding ability. Have a long lasting edge, you may give up durability. Finding the best compromise is the challange. But I think that beyong the roughly 150 mark, your not paying for metalurgy any more, your paying for craftsmanship or uniqueness or a name.

I havent gone and looked yet but based on the Cold Steel comment, Im going to have a very skeptical perspective because THAT knife is a POS as are every Cold Steel knife I ever owned!

BTW the last shot was the bottom shot. Thought I fired five. Cleared the weapon and whoops, 4 so had to reload the last round. If I hadnt broke position, the group would likely be smaller. Impressive rifle!

My group with Rouel's OBR Looks like its coming in at .346 CTC Raw scan of grp

Harry, whats the prognosis on joining there? Last I looked into it, there was a fairly significant wait?

Joel you should have stayed for the afterparty Truly, thanks guys for putting on the match!!! Shane

I zero @ 50.

I thought the ACR was in the same boat as the SCAR which seems to need emags (although the 15/20's work in mine just fine).

Release the rear ring cap. If you have over torqued it and its proximity to the erector(the adjustment knobs) could be binding it internally. Are the bases sloped or 0 moa? I am not a fan of shiming, especially in rings that dont tolerate it like burris z rings do. It will bind the scope. Even if you get that last bit of adjustment, you are going to be at the end of adjustment and in most scopes this will cause windage issues as well. I always recomend working this out even if it means scraping the base and rings you have.

Lunker, I agree with you whole heartedly. I more meant it in the context of a group than an individual. You would need to be wealthy to stand up on this as an individual. I grow so weary of being harassed and persecuted....

I expect to see all your asses at the match at USANA tomorrow!!!!!!!!!!

Dont fall into the trap. Our attitude should really be FU. Your ban is unconstitutional anyway so piss off!!!!