Shane45

pbkid, you don't seem to get it. The question is not if that comp is ultimately legal, the issue is you may find yourself in court defending its legality due to its ambiguity. Please illuminate exactly what led you to your position on how NJ LE may view this device. Indeed we do have problems in this state, that is the problem. And possibly creating more victims is not a solution. Is a 5,10, or 20k in legal fees, should you have an unfavorable interaction, worth it to use that device over another? What exactly is the down side or negative impact on gun ownership in NJ by choosing say a Battlecomp instead? How exactly does that contribute to our problems as you claim?

Sell, the point is not if it actually hides flash or not, the point is, under less than ideal circumstances you are not going to be proving your case on the side of the road or when officers are at your house while you were cleaning your rifle, (insert innocent interaction here) they are simply going to kick it upstairs for decision making and the most likely outcome is you will get to prove your case in court. From the officers I have talked to about this compensator specifically, what raises their concern is not the "insert your finger" test, its based in the description or understanding of a compensator. Their understanding is that the hole in the face of the compensator is very slightly larger than the diameter of the projectile. In the case of the BCM, it is not a circle which makes the perceived opening considerably larger than the diameter of the projectile. And that ambiguity is what could land you in the position of having to prove your case. I would personally not pick the BCM unless funds for a legal defence was not an issue and I had full faith in the NJ legal system.

pbkid6974, sounds like your willing to pony up the cash for legal fees for anyone following your advice! Being cautious in a state that is out to get you is not spreading fear, it is being wise. Other comps that arguably perform better and have no ambiguity about them simply makes more sense to protect against the possibility of a LE interaction where the interacting agency is less than 2A friendly. You are in a state where all things firearms related finds you guilty until proven innocent.

If I had a nickel for every time a range "expert" admonished me for my point a to point b draw stroke and not doing the up and press out I could buy a few new bangsticks! I liked this vid as I took a few pointers away to refine it further, thanks.

"I don't care who he endorses or not. My problem is an integrity issue, on multiple levels. Not to mention that while he can shoot, he doesn't really know what he is talking about." INDEED!

Indeed the BG was the ex-boyfriend!

So how would the bill apply in this situation. A child gained access and someone was injured!!! http://newsok.com/woman-stabbed-man-shot-in-southeast-oklahoma-city-early-wednesday/article/5345087

Well......FN seems to be good at flukes They did surprisingly well with the PS90 and the FS2k too! Take a look at what the SCAR16 came out at price wise, look how long that has endured, and look at what the ACR came out at and has dropped too. The FN's have had an amazing ability to hold a price point. FN has cut loose with some people they shouldn't have (the ones that have a clue!). And HK usually is a few ticks off but their execution of the VP9 gives me a good sense someone is paying attention and willing to sign off on significant departures from HK status quo. If you want to talk about a fubar'ed co one just need to look toward Exeter New Hampshire.

Jon, some of my problem is things like performance being scored by the group of "disinterested" testers. I would have MUCH preferred a field of testers that actually know what they are looking at. People who know what chromatic aberration is and understand the value of color reproduction etc etc. Other wise its kind of like asking 6 people who never shot a pistol before to evaluate a bunch of pistols and then base performance off their feedback. I do agree their is a lot of data there to evaluate but it probably would have been better if he didn't draw any conclusions. Or perhaps some favorite pics for a certain criteria. For example, take that S&B and get around a lot of bright lights and see how much better it deals with flaring and things like that compared to others. Or how scopes like the PMII and the Hensoldt will allow you to see well in to twilight where other scopes in that test will leave you feeling like your looking through a tinted window in the dark. I see three scopes in that comparison that were spec built for the PSR contract trials. Meaning they were built to very specific specifications for a specific role. Comparing those to a scope like the March or a SFP Nightforce is kind of odd too. Just one more adder, unless your rocking a 338LM and you live in the land of 1k yd ranges, do you need, 24, 25, 27 or 30 power top end?!?!?! So really someone that is looking for a scope in this range should be well aware of the feature set that suits what he is looking for. I didn't see a lot of those feature sets represented in this test. I know I am being critical, but some of the scopes in that test are the price of used cars!!! Did you see the price on the new Henny and S&B???

Meh, the resulting order creates some issues for me. Having had hands on a lot of the scopes on the list including owning a number of them, I just cant see how some scopes placed over others. But to the authors credit, he acknowledges that you can interpret the data and come up with your own order. With that being said, it seems his order was based on performance. And there is where my issues are.

I see your priorities are in order!!!

What your missing is the point pro gun positions are appearing in publications that have a history as anti gun. And you know what, if the libtards reading it can so easily fall for it against, then they can fall for it in favor.

Are people waking up? Or are we becoming trendy? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-p-stadtlander/gun-bans-a-safe-haven-for_b_5792314.html

Did you buy the car from a new car dealer?

Yeah that would be annoying!

These were AIAW's that rang on you? My AICS did indeed ring as you describe, but my AIAW did not do this. The skins indeed can appear cheap. And some people just cant get behind the layout. But for me the attraction is the robustness of the system, especially the trigger and its ability to withstand some crud and still function. I have had 3, I am sure there will be a #4

This one was surely racially motivated.. http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/08/beaten_to_death_at_mcdonalds.html

I wonder why the Bridgeport isn't in the sale?!?!?!

Having chatted with some IDF boys I have come to the conclusion that they have some funny ideas about things. As a result I simply conclude their needs/wants are significantly different than my needs/wants. Therefore I pay no mind to their selections. But I find this is true with most things/groups/units etc etc. So if you are a collector and just want authentic, go for it. If you intend on using the system, get what best fits your needs.

Played with the V-Cog, wasn't doing it for me. The reticle is a bit on the odd side for its intention and the FOV is far inferior to the Elcan. Yes the Elcan is a bit of weight BUT when you take a regular scope and add mounts etc etc its pretty close. But in particular it balances well on a SCAR. I suspect its because of its short footprint and where it lands on the rail on a SCAR. I like the USO 1-8 a lot BUT your mission statement needs to be favoring the longer distance over the shorter one.

Remixer, did your customer reach out to the FIU specifically?

Guys, understand that the NJSP FIU reached out to express the offer to assist those looking to re-acquire their property. They didn't need to do anything. I can say as a matter of FACT that there are some really good guys in that unit. Lets leave it at that.

Again, your concern is a civil case? What is it I am misunderstanding? Twice now it would seem your concern is a civil case against you.

So your concern is a civil liability case? Well if your state has a law that indemnifies you if you if no cause is found criminally, then you don't have a concern. But if you live in a state that has no protection, well where does it end? Do you not shoot IDPA classes because you will be painted as a person who practiced killing? Do you not use any humanoid type targets for the same reason? If the civil lawyer is going to paint you in a bad light, he's going to paint you.... In my opinion, just buy the ccw insurance policy and move on.

Disappointing . OK so is East Stroudsburg really that bad in PA? Some nice houses for reasonable money there.