Anselmo

Minnesota has introduced the same exact bill. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0241.0.html&session=ls88

Here are the instructions for Manalapan. http://www.manalapanpolice.org/firearms-applications Fill out the forms at home. Save yourself one trip. Remember, do not sign the mental health form ahead of time. Sign it at the police station.

All targets not purchased at Range 14 need to be inspected by an RO. The RO basically told me that they don't want wood splintering and ricochets and stuff like that. If it was me, I'd say no to a mannequin as I don't want to see what looks like a person down range when the call to go hot is given.

Look at it from their perspective, these people think they serve the people that voted them into office.

I agree but CC doesn't want to be bullied into signing gun laws that will do nothing to prevent crime.

I got questioned by a younger RO at Range 14 about the 10 rd long magazine on my 15-22. My first time at Delran Jr. Marksman, the RO came over to check out my M&P Sport. I figured he'd question its legality but instead he told me that he had the same rifle and how much he liked it.

If you consent to the search, it's a legal search. Handguns are illegal in your vehicle in NJ unless you meet an exemption. A black bag in view marked GLOCK or MIDWAY or 5.11 would lead the police to believe you might have a gun in your possession and might be probable cause for a search and further investigation to verify you have a valid exemption for transport.

N.J.A.C. 13:54-1.4 Applications for a firearms purchaser identification card and for a permit to purchase a handgun (a) Every person applying for a firearms purchaser identification card or for a permit to purchase a handgun shall furnish such information and particulars as are set forth in the application form designated STS-33. Forms can be obtained from municipal police departments, State Police stations and licensed retail firearms dealers. (b) The applicant shall waive any statutory or other right of confidentiality relating to institutional confinement. © The applicant shall provide the names and addresses of two reputable citizens personally acquainted with him as references.

The full truth came out about that guy. Seems he had the shotgun a little too accessible in his jeep if I remember correctly. Some range officers like to chew people out. I don't shoot at those places.

I think you are misreading it. The M&P 10 is a new line of larger caliber .308 semi-automatic sporting rifles.

I would avoid Shore Shot's range if I were you. LOL.

Smith and Wesson makes an NJ compliant Sport model. Pre panic priced at $650.

Some PDs have enough manpower to take care of FIDs in a timely manner and some don't. Some may choose to prioritize other things as more important than FIDs. The reason for the delays given by some PDs is BS.

Still too expensive for me. I'll wait it out.

It means I think that he set himself up.

No flash hider, no bayo lug. In other words, this upper has no evil features. As long as your lower only has one evil feature, you're legal in NJ.

Of all the people with AR15 type rifles in NJ, it's an activist that gets arrested for illegal possession of an assault weapon? Keeping a pistol by your side but wearing headphones so you can't hear someone knocking on your door. Hiring Nappen to represent you. I wish the guy the best.

Just seems like common sense. A cargo worth in the millions of dollars and why not spend a few dollars on some "contractors" to protect the cargo.

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment . We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997) , and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001) , the Second Amendment extends, prima facie,to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding. Justice Scalia in Heller

Shore Shot said they took training in how to spot a straw purchase and, in their opinion, this was a text book example. The FFL has a responsibility as a gatekeeper so that is part of their job to not just rubber stamp every transfer. Their training must have included: what to do when you suspect a straw purchase. This is where thing broke down. Within an hour on their FB page they went from waiting on ATF to ok the transfer to sending the shotgun back to the seller.

Shore Shot stated that they would have the transfer if the husband had an FID but that would still not have mitigated a straw purchase. It would still be a straw purchase if the wife had the NICS in order to get the firearm for her husband who might not have passed NICS.

After reading the Shore Shot statement on Facebook, it seems there is a lack of communication someplace. Shore Shot said they've reported this to the ATF as a possible straw purchase and now the ATF needs in investigate to determine whether the transfer can proceed. Was this communicated to Mrs. DSD?

OGAM starts when you take possession. It is independent of NICS. The NICS check is good for a limited amount of time so try to get the shotgun transferred ASAP so you won't have to do the NICS again.

What is ShoreShot decision then, to eat the $15 they paid for the NICS and then to absorb the costs to ship the gun back to where it came from? What do they plan to do with the shotgun? I assume the whole point of the FFL system is to make the FFL a sort of gatekeeper and give them the responsibility to reject transfers that they don't want to make. I'm cool with that but there needs to be some sort of standard operating procedure to follow when this happens.

Did you wife pay the $15 for the NICS check? I'm still steamed that ShoreShot told you to come back at noon. What kind of a business does that.