JackDaWack

That's a little bit of a rediculous response.. First off, it's not the potential to shoot someone... It the potential to defend yourself. Don't be an idiot, again. Secondly, every single police blotter I read is some idiot getting high in their car... Meaning, the cops smelled burnt pot and found evidence of recent use. Why didn't you mention the potential of those situations? I certainly don't approve of the war on drugs, but Im also not a moron and believe we should be spending tax dollars on addicts... Liberals are retarded in that aspect. Let people do what they want, they can also deal with the consequences.

If they were such great 9mm's at least some on that list, why aren't they made anymore? The 1911 is easily one of the best .45's, AND it's still in production today with a few alterations from the original. It's not a bad list, but if your going to make a "best 9mm of all time" you would probably want to pick something that is still being produced because it is the "best".

"constructive intent" at least in NJ, AFAIK only refers to Assault weapons.

Update: They are requesting to "re-do" the oral arguments due to a record error? Jesus, what a bunch of morons running the courts.... it's hard to give this court any respect.

You never know with today's SCOTUS how these decisions will be made. If I were a liberal on the third... I would establish grandfathering and then allow the law the stand. Otherwise, the entire thing is headed to SCOTUS and if accepted will be shot down.

You don't deserve them if you forget them in a rental. The kids will be safe, because I'll keep em safe... Ha. My gripe is the legality.... I'd Be way to scared to take them anywhere, which makes owning them pointless.

If someone can't respect your right to carry on your own property, why should you respect their opinion? If gun owners are just gonna hide and "blend in", then we are supressing our own culture.

I don't carry a firearm openly to start trouble, either. I also refuse to not do it just because someone gonna get their panties in a bunch. I don't care to have a conversation with the cops, either. However, if they want to infringe further upon my rights, illegally at that, I would not care much about them showing up and any legal issues that precipitate. I know Im not breaking any laws, and the last thing cops will get involved in is a civil dispute between neighbors. You guys complain about NJ guns laws all the fucking time, then you add even more restrictions for personal reasons! Then complain when they pass more gun laws!

You could use it as a teachable moment. Chances are if the cops did show up, they probably won't again.

I do it all the time.

The last thing I would give a shit about is a cop showing up at my door asking me if I'm carrying a gun on my property. I also shoot test loads in my backyard into a back stop to check velocities... If the cops show up... Again.. I don't really care. At the end of the day, if a cop arrests you.. he needs to actually charge you with violating a law. A prosecutor would also have to affirm those charges. I wouldn't let no bullshit stop me from carrying on my own property.

It's claims to have 1moa accuracy... That's basically a 17s.. So what's the point of this if it's barely better than a 17? Just curious.

Wouldnt the be entirely dependant on who modified the magazine to begin with? If they used epoxy, it doesn't matter really what you do, it will be tough to take off. At the end of the day, a 10 round mag cost like 10 bucks, and zero headaches. Most limiters i found are already like 4-5 bucks a piece.

Just make sure you're elevated, shooting downward.

Can off duty cops in CA carry when at a bar drinking?

Recently used Montella, a 15 yard dumpster costed about 500 bucks with a 2.5 ton limit, overaged just costed more. They were super easy to use. They have a website you cant order right off from. https://www.njdumpsterrentals.com/

You cant buy a handgun across state lines. Luckily, your not buying a handgun across state lines. What your buying is not considered a firearm, per ATF. YOU manufacture it out of state, 100% legal. There are no laws that prevent you from bringing a firearm legally obtained out of state back home with you. I don care much to argue what NJ might try to do to you, but I dont see what exactly your going to be charged with. Again, simply being in possession of a complete firearm that originated as a 80% has no implications to being manufactured in NJ. It's speculative and barely circumstantial.

Everyone ignored him. Nothing can keep you from bringing an otherwise legally obtained firearm from out of state back home. Unless otherwise banned to own in sate, whats to keep you from? A P2P is only used for handguns purchased in NJ.

No, if you read the law carefully, the possession of a part not registered with an FFL that requires manufacturing is illegal. The law goes a step further and states that the parts in question wouldn't be able to function as a firearm. Not sure if they did it on purpose or not, but it sounds like actual functioning firearms have nothing to do with the new law, unless 3d printed.

The bill is already through, just waiting for a signature and it's enacted.. might as well just consider it law right now. Not sure of the legality, but the law states that the part to be made into a firearm must be traceable through an FFL. So a serial number would be registered, but I have no idea if this is even allowed if it's not a firearm yet or how they would record it. Honestly, if you have a complete firearm made from an 80% whatever... The state would still have to prove you built it in state. Just because you live here doesnt automatically make it built here... A friend of mine built a few of these at his lake house out of state, and returned with the complete firearm. Even if they found the tools used to make one, they would have to prove it was used in state. I haven't yet, but my dad has the tools needed down in Florida to finish an 80%, and I have no issues making one there and bringing it home with me. Nothing in the new law makes any mention of a fully functional firearm... In fact the law specifically states the parts outlawed reqiure manufacturing and cannot function.

AFAIK, The serial number must be registered with an FFL if you were to own an 80%. The wording of the law does speak specifically to items which still need to be manufactured/assembled. This should mean that any completed firearms are not effected. So you cant own an 80% lower, unless registered with an FFL, but you can own a manufactured receiver, so long as you manufactured it outside of NJ. Solution... buy outside of NJ, manufacture out side of NJ, return to NJ. At least thats how i read it.

If you need a letter from your doctor, it doesn't have to be about firearms. Make it simple... Have him evaluate if you are a threat to others or yourself, that's all. No reason for why.

But even those opinions followed a nearly razor thin margin. The permit process doesn't necessarily deny someone of firearm ownership, there has been yet anyone to challenge that. The argument is obviously to prevent prohibited person from ownership.. the fees need to be challenged again, and maybe go the SCOTUS this time.

"Been almost 9 years" You guys keep referencing the past, and a SCOTUS that never had the majority need for change. Why do you think the current SCOTUS would deny these cases? They took up Heller in those 9 years, what makes you think they won't proceed with the majority vote now?

An event of national proportion takes place and you're stuck on NJ's stupid laws that could be crushed by the first in a long time 2a SCOTUS majority. NJ's laws won't change unless forced, and they won't stop passing them until they start getting knocked down. Nothing suggests the new SCOTUS would continue to reject cases with the power to actually do something now.