JackDaWack

We found some apple hooch at a distillery in Fairfield this year, mix with apple cider and you got a winner.

Merry Christmas ya filthy animals..

Wifey has a 2017, put nearly 50k on it with no problems.. I even enjoy it in the snow, been caught In a few storms going up the same elevation, drove past a lot of stuck vehicles just fine on stock tires. I was under the impression this was really an issue for extreme cold weather and not allowing the engine to get up to temp before turning it off.

Damn!! That's good price! Just grabbed a few I don't even need. I have been very impressed with aero precisions quality, used a couple items on my last build.

Precisely. You think you need Alexa or Facebook installed for it to be an issue? Apple sells your info, and so does Google... When you buy a phone or computer and use their root programs your already doing this. Youre just helping the process by using Facebook or the like, making it slighly easier for them to capitalize on your information.

Which optics are you breaking in a year? I thought the argument was these higher end optics are durable, that why they cost more money?

That's nice, you must be an operator? I don't need a $1,000 optic to shoot targets at 300 yards or less.. It would be nice, but it's wasted money. I owned EoTech, Aimpont Trijicon.... yet the rifle and optic that gets the most use at the range.... has a Nikon Monarch 3 on it. I appreciate quality gear that will probably never serve up to its potential in my life time, and it's there if i need it. But, I have zero plans on replacing it... the glass is "good enough" that i don't even think about it. These responses remind me of the people who drive 55mph on the high way in their Ferrari's. This pretentious attitude, like every optic you own needs to be top tier is ridiculous... like saying every AR I own must be a Noveske. Top tier gear is 100% worth purchasing, but not 100% of the time. Unless youre loaded with cash, or simply trying to impress people at each and every turn. If you can complete the same task with a cheaper piece of gear, what does it matter?

I'm using the Hornady swager assembly for the LNL, and it definitely has a taper on. Too much will make the pocket loose, and you can also crush the pocket itself with the case seat. I'm using a hand primer now, and taking out just enough crimp to get them to seat. I am also separating the process by brass now, definitely more consistent as the LC brass has a harder to remove crimp. Other cases seem to require much less. I also load the cci 5.56 primers. So they are very hard.

I deprime and then wet tumble. My reasoning is that I have clean brass to work with through the entire process. I use Hornady one shot case lube, so I don't need to clean them after. When I was reading up, some people either cleaned the brass twice, or would put dirty brass through the dies and clean prior to case assembly. Since I'm new to bottle neck reloading, I decided this might be a good place to start. I've gotten everything dialed in now and running smoothly.

He spoke about the intent of the amendment, and how it's been interpreted in the past, allll past. This is very very helpful, because SCOTUS has very very few rulings on 2a cases... Nothing says he wouldn use lower court rulings and interpretation. It was also a wishy washy answer to begin with. I'm sure it helped him get through the hearings without cause an uproar. "Instead, he called on gun laws to be weighed based on “text, history, and tradition” and “by appropriate analogues thereto when dealing with modern weapons and new circumstances.” In short, Kavanaugh’s test asks whether a gun law or regulation has been historically or traditionally accepted, instead of deciding whether a local, state, or federal government’s interest in public safety outweighs constitutional protections for gun ownership." in that context... Way more states beleive in and supported the right to carry.

I think it was the Gen 2 that had issues with the SCAR16.

Will they ship if your billing address is NJ? For the price of magblock and epoxy... thats still a damn good deal.

If youre a day trader... Id be sweating my ass off right now... Luckily... if you follow the long term market trends you cant lose if you have wise investment strategies.. and play for the end game. It's nice to get in low, and sell high.. but the normal investor loses money trying to do that... timing the market is impossible if you dont make it a 24/7 job. There are stats out there, and most day traders get rich off the dumbass trying to play the market short term. I myself learned a few lessons there, but I didnt have a choice... would have made a killing if I didn't pull money out to buy a house.

Which NVR are u using?

The SCOTUS has ruled on almost every amendment, that they are not absolute and subject to limitations.. one of those being public safety. The core right cannot be removed. I know people twist Scalia opinion in Heller but even he believed in limitations for public safety such as convicted felons should not own firarms, or the mentally I'll.

Well, the idea is that the cases create a standard for scrutiny, and that it is the states job to prove whether it meets it or not. The idea is that they use the same level of scrutiny... That the individuals right is greater than the whole when it serves a purpose to the individual. That is if there is an argument to remove it for the benefit of the public. I see the argument as, even if smaller mags prevent Mass shootings, at least in NJ they are so infrequent, that limiting an individuals right to better protect themselves actually out weighs the comparison.

He actually addressed the issue in relative terms to the limitations of the first, and asks for the same level of scrutiny be applied to the second. He states very clearly that in limiting either right, the state must show an abundance of proof that it would disproportionately benefit public safety. It is actually easier to remove the free speech of individuals since it only requires judges to determine if your speech directly endangered the safety of others. Whether that be making threats or causing false public alarm. That becomes an issue of "intent". In the case of firearms, it can always be argued that disarming the public would put them at lesser odds of safety or self defense. In relative terms to how often a mass shooting takes place.

I'm not saying that violating the second is defacto violating the 5th or 14th. Im just saying that once it's determined the state cant limit your possession of Mags, the other arguments become moot. They don't always address each point as an individual item

The point is, there is no reason to bring them up. If he believes the law didnt meet the requirements of the 2nd amendment, then it cannot possibly meet any other. If he agreed with the majority about the second, then it would make sense to mention the others if he didn't agree, but thats not the case. If we "win", then we get back our mags, or more.... the 5th and 14th arguments become completely moot.

It's a dissenting opinion, it carries zero meaning in the eyes of the court. If he doesn't opinion directly on it then he doesn't give an direct alternative opinion, that doesn't mean he doesn't have one. In this specific case, if he affirms the second is violated, he affirms violation of all the others. The government cant remove that which is a right to own, and you cant have unequal classes of individuals if people are rightful to protected arms. If he was going to be part of the majority opinion I would image he would hit every argument with purpose, he focused on one here, and well.

You just proved my point, and made two contradictory statements. It doesn't matter what his opinion is on the other two which is why he doesn't give it. The Majority has to address each violation argued. If he argued that the magazines are covered under the second, and that the state provided no justification for public safety. That then means the state cannot require you to forfeit them, and that an equal class is established under the removal of enforcing the law. Their is a blanketed understanding of the implications of what he said.

Bibas argued the entire law was unconstitutional based on the criteria for justifying public safety, and the undue burden placed on LCM owners... It's not specifically mentioned, but its covered in his dissent in a round about way. The entirety of his dissent is that that state made zero argument in limiting the rights of individuals. The dissenting opinion doesn't have to hit every point of the case when the fundamentals of the law are found to be unconstitutional. His main argument discredits every sub argument of the majority opinion.

What makes you say this would be preliminary? The hearing was for an injunction of the law, I have yet to see if this will be a permanent or temporary injunction for further review. The district judges can make any rulings as to why the law is unconstitutional, theit opinions could indicate 15 rounds is fine, or outright claim any limit is wrong.

lol, my wife is licensed through the State and DEA, it took her almost 6 months to get all her documents changed over. If the permits aren't used, then they are probably trash once she officially changes her name, primarily because of the new ID she will have won't match for verification. I do believe the statute has carved out requiring an new ID for change of name.

He can take the hub, but the video is stored on the cloud for a period of time. My only point with security, if your connecting anything to a wireless router, doesn't matter what it is.. if you can bypass the security of the ARLO pro you can most likely gain access to the router itself and then anything connected to it. I fully understand the differences, and the questions asked here were how the systems work. As a user of the ARLO pro 2 system, it has done everything I need it to do, and has done it well enough for it to be meaningful. I'm not trying to compare it to a wired system. As an easy gift to someone it's something that can be very useful. Just remembered, a crude paintball gun will render any camera useless... This is just a single line of defense.