JackDaWack

Yet, a superintendent doesn't teach.

Driving a car is not a right, neither is owning an "adult business" like the NY court ruled. Not to mention fees for businesses are recouped. If you have to pay a ridiculous fee to exercise a right, is it really a right? or is it only something people who can afford to pay it get to exercise? If the fee is making the state money, to use it beyond a background check for eligibility, then i fail to see how it could even remotely be considered constitutional. Because now you are paying to exercise a right, and not paying for an eligibility check. Some would say, even we shouldn't have to pay for the background check. No I have to prove I am eligible, by paying for background checks?

I don't believe that decision was ever challenged past the state supreme court level for whatever reason.

ANJRPC FILES MOTION TO HALT ENFORCEMENT OF MAG BAN! Seeks to Put Mag Ban on Hold While Court Decides Whether to Invalidate the New Law June 21, 2018. Just a week after filing suit in federal court to overturn New Jersey’s new ban on magazines that can hold over 10 rounds of ammunition, ANJRPC today filed a motion for an injunction to halt enforcement of the ban while the lawsuit is pending. "This unconstitutional law makes no one safer,” said ANJRPC executive director Scott Bach. “It will be ignored by criminals, and affects only law-abiding citizens. To make matters worse, it gives the public a limited time to get rid of or permanently alter their lawfully acquired magazines. It therefore is imperative that the law be put on hold until the Court decides whether it is constitutional to force a million people who have committed no crime to forfeit or permanently alter their property.” ANJRPC's motion shows that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in their claim that New Jersey’s magazine ban is unconstitutional, and points out that a federal court in California recently put a similar magazine ban on hold while it decides whether to overturn it. A link to the legal brief just filed in the New Jersey case is available here. This case was filed in cooperation with the National Rifle Association. "We thank the NRA for its incredible support and guidance, which made this lawsuit and this new motion possible," said Bach. CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO THE CASE! Any New Jersey resident interested in joining ANJRPC in the lawsuit should contact us at [email protected], especially those who have ever been burglarized, robbed, attacked, or even threatened by a gang or by multiple criminals at the same time, in a documented incident. Please forward this email to every gun owner you know, and if you don’t already receive alerts from ANJRPC, please subscribe to our free email alerts for the latest Second Amendment breaking news and action alerts. About ANJRPC: The Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs is the official New Jersey affiliate of the NRA, and is New Jersey’s oldest, largest, and most effective Second Amendment advocacy organization. <click here for the online version of this alert>

But you said it was arbitrary... it is not. A psychopath really isn't much more than an extreme asshole, and keep in mind, they scored each of these attributes/characteristics separately and complied a summutive score.

The research provided a "score" for psychopathy, it didn't state these people were actually psychopaths. I think any reasonable person would conclude that it takes a real mental health assessment to determine if someone is truly a psychopath. A more accurate analysis of the study would be that people scoring high have psychopathic tendencies.

"Earlier research shows that psychopathy is composed of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness, and a forthcoming paper shows that these characteristics can be translated into the big five traits: “Boldness corresponds to low neuroticism and high extraversion, meanness corresponds to low agreeableness, and disinhibition corresponds to low conscientiousness,” explains Murphy. This finding allowed the researcher to translate analysis of personality in US states to a score for psychopathy." What is arbitrary about these comparisons to psychopathic behavioral characteristics?

I love GFH, but its impossible to go without waiting forever and their prices are a bit high. I almost prefer shooting in the cold or rain at cherry ridge. At least the place is barren then.

"hold my beer"

All things are relative. Showering too much isn't good, just like cleaning your guns too much isn't good. How much is too much? That Depends.

Nappan has always been on the WAY safe side of NJ law. As a lawyer I don't blame him, because NJ will do what it wants to when it comes down to it. IMO the ATF letters apply to to all states, as they clarify federal law, which supercede state laws.

Local mayor's are definitely not well connected, At least a Sussex town mayor. Most towns don't even keep the same mayor for that long. You know the ones who are connected, are the ones who make a career out of it.

Bobby boy was illlegaly possessing assult rifles in public, the police gave zero shits. These people are too connected.

Which mayor? I've been think of something like this. He wants to take them so bad, he can have them!

As far as i can tell, he took a bunch of different and unrelated subsections and mishmashed them to come to some ridiculous conclusion. I mean are they not trying to pass a law right now aimed at making 80%'s illegal to purchase and own? what's the point if he believes they are already illegal? I would be interested in how he could be sued, maybe we can get a company to join up with the NRA or ANJRPC, couldnt hurt to drop another lawsuit on these basterds.

I posted it above, it only applies to the constructive intent to build an assault weapon. How you go from an 80% receiver, and applying it as a part to readily construct an Assault weapon is full blown retarded. It is not even a listed part that makes a weapon that of the "assault" type. The ATF has already defined an 80%, it is not a firearm, and is not a part used to construct a firearm. They have made it clear that it must be manufactured in order to become a firearm part.

What makes this AG letter complete bullshit is the lack of any law actually being cited. "These weapons are illegal in our state" , according to what? "New Jersey law prohibits selling and possessing any combination of parts from which an assault firearm may be readily assembled". This is a line taken from the AWB, about turning a firearm into a Assault weapon. Again, how he is applying this is just baffling. "(5)A part or combination of parts designed or intended to convert a firearm into an assault firearm, or any combination of parts from which an assault firearm may be readily assembled if those parts are in the possession or under the control of the same person." An 80% by ATF definition is not a Firearm, so it's not yet a part that can even be readily used to assemble one, let alone an Assault weapon.

There is nothing illegal about buying an 80% lower in NJ, yet. The law as he is applying would only be applied to completed lower receivers... It's a bullshit order. An 80% lower is not a firearm, and is not a part that can be readily assembled into a firearm, let alone an assualt weapon. This guy is a fuckwad if he really thinks NJ law even remotely applies, which is why they want that new bill to pass which would make 80% lowers illegal. You just can't manufacture it IN* NJ. So the new AG is either entirely incompetent or just a anti Constitutional gunngrabber, or most likely both.

Being a 4wd wagon, it could very well be an drive shaft or CV-joint. I had a CV joint go on my car and it had similar results, minus the airbag deployment. Airbags deploy based on force, and is usually based on an algorithm with speed factored. So the vibrations could have effected the sensor readings.

I don't disagree, which is why I would personally return it. That doesn't change the issue that every state has laws about carrying. Just recently Texas passed some that lifted restrictions. Which is good, but would make one wonder what other states do. Constitution carry, which I agree with, is pretty new to most states, and even they print cards for reciprocity.

I'd give the guy his gun back. But that's not without the understanding that you are either irresponsible or living under a rock thinking NJ was going to be OK with this. Every state has outlined specific ways in which carry is legal. Open/CCW and location of firearms in vehicles. Places you can bring them etc.... While most of America cant fathom thinking about not carrying a firearm, even their state has laws about how to do so. So I don't really see the argument that they didn't know better. Everyone should know they need to follow the specific carry laws of the state they are in. That's not even getting into NJ being anti-Gun. If Texas has carry laws, why wouldn't NJ? or every other state they passed through?

Try and pick loans that will give you the option to consolidate in the future.

Myself, and anyone else, can only tell you want the bill says. Like I said, the language speaks to parts not yet manufactured, and those parts normally serialized and recorded by an FFL. If it's a fully manufactured receiver then I don't see how the bill applies, if its a part that is not serialized and recorded by an FFL normally, then it doesn't apply.

i bought the Smith Optics Elite Aegis Echo, they were like 25 buck on sale. Love the low profile to fit under ear muffs.

IIm not a lawyer, but the way the statute reads, the part is illegal prior to manufacturing. My guess is it would only apply to the part of the firearm normally serialized, so the receiver. It's anyone's guess but a simple block of aluminum could fall under this stupid written law.