JackDaWack

Can we delete this thread? It's either a) illegal or b) something that shouldn't be advertised to our liberal sleepers.

I was reading though some bullshit, apparently Cali ruled that since you can sell your mags to a ffl the government was not denying you of your property because it didn't require you give it to the police(government). Or if you can move them out of state, which again requires me to forfeit my property because I'm once again denied access to my property. How does this work? The law itself, denies you the right of ownership of your property or access, regardless of who recieved that property, or if it is to be destroyed. They even disregard compensation through sales, when no one wants to buy them. What says the government has to specifically take the property in order for the right to be violated. The laws very clearly deny you your rights to property, regardless of how it requires you to remove it from ownership.

I have no preference, both are equally amazing to me. Pancakes with chocolate chips or Waffles with Icecream/Whipcream Both smothered in butter and syrup with a large amounts of well(not burnt) cook bacon.

Is this really worth bliding someone to the point it could cause a massive accident? What's wrong with your high beams? A flood light Led bar, the one you're probably experiencing on the road is bad enough. I'm also pretty sure what you're inferring about is highly illegal on the road. I really don't understand why cops don't pull people over more for that crap, it's not legal to put a HID in a halogen housing since they arent DOT approved.

This is NJ, who the hell knows how this shit works.

Edit, NVM, i read deeper into the laws and found everything. I figured filling out a COE would make it transferred as a rifle. 13:54-3.12 Requirements for sale of rifle, shotgun, antique cannon or receiver Every purchaser, other than a licensed or registered retail or wholesale dealer or manufacturer, or law enforcement agency as provided by this chapter, must present a valid firearms purchaser identification card to the dealer who is required to confirm the identity of the purchaser. The purchaser must also sign a certificate of eligibility (NJSP 634), filled out by the dealer or his licensed employee, for each rifle, shotgun, antique cannon or receiver purchased. The certificate shall indicate that the purchaser presently complies with all of the requirements for obtaining an identification card, and shall set forth the purchaser's name, address and identification card number. The certificate shall be retained by the dealer. Prior to completing the sale or transfer of a rifle, shotgun, or receiver, the retail dealer shall initiate a NICS check with the Division of State Police. So if you buy a lower receiver you should technically be able to build it into a non-nfa, following those guidelines. Since it never transferred to you as a rifle, and is documented on form 4473.

Afaik, they should be. However, when I buy ar15 lowers, they are always marked as rifles on form 4473.(edit, they are marked as "other" receiver, not rifle).

The Torque Pro App is awsomes, well worth the money. It can also give you a lot of real time data depending on the type of vehicle you have.

I've figured a few things. The shockwave is legal because it is not a modified shotgun, and doesnt meet the criteria of a rifle pistol or shotgun. Those firearms with short barrels are not sbr's, even with stocks, because they lack rifling. The firarms with pistol braces, are not rifles, with vfg are not pistol, and They exceed 26" not NFA NJ requires that they cannot originate as rifles, or shotguns, else they be considered a sawed off. However, nothing says, that I can find, that you cannot modify a pistol into a non nfa. Unless that falls under a manufacturing restriction. So this could very well be legal if it originated as a pistol, with a P2P. Or you could convince your FFL to sell the recieved as a "firearm".(edit, they are sold as "other", reciever, not rifle)

A lot of ticks are resistant to front line now, We use Vectra and it's is awesome. Deer is a neurotoxin, so you should avoid high dosages directly on the skin. This is why the deep woods off is good. I have the 99% spray I put on my boots and pants.

David Hogg is garbage, He would be irrelevant if he really believed what he said. He has been in the media's spot light for months sensationalizing the shooting. The media cant push it's narrative, and neither can the gun grabbers, without full on 24/7 media coverage after these events. Of course these events inspire the same sick minds that will do this again. The stories that would deter them, the ones where an aggressor is dropped before being able to take a life, never make it to print.

People are just not intuitive enough. For the that price, you could buy a sonic cleaning tank that would do a full rifle. Then lube it up, that maid service might come in handy here.

Speaking purely in terms of today, I agree. That's not to say it wont be changing in the immediate future as the massholes move in to reap benefits of cheap living. Thank god they have the majority right now, because they just blocked a bunch of gun bills. Lets see if they maintain that majority in the coming elections.

But thats what i'm curious about, why no worry? Look to your left, right, up, down. ALL BLUE. Look to yourself, mostly Blue. Their US Senators and Reps are democrats. I know many areas are republican and pro gun, but they seem to be getting out number as time moves on. The state house is majority republican, but in 2010 it wasn't. And the state Senate is almost split.

I certainly can appreciate the Live Free or Die motto NH lives by, but doesn't it worry you that it has been progressively turning into a blue state? It's voted blue for many many years, i'm surprised the state hasn't seen the blue death within like place such as Colorado.

I don't actually think NJ defines what a pistol grip is for rifles, all it states is the location of it.

How much?

Nothing wrong with that if you can keep the grass green. I like to run my R/C car in the yard with the dogs and keep the rear yard at about 2- 1/2 in. Some people like short grass, but the ground dries out faster and the weeds have more opportunity to grow. My front yard is cut at 3-1/2, but mainly because of stupid rocks and uneven dips here and there. We get high spots of grass, random patches where the grass grows super green and tall, so i end up mowing about every 10 days anyway. You can run my deck on the ground at under 1" with the gauge wheels, my lawn isnt that level though. Wife made me buy the clipping collection system, which for the John Deere is stupid expensive on the x500 series cause you need a blower... IM trying to convince her to let me buy the Auto dump bin, but she doesnt see the need for that, of course. To mow a little less than an acre takes me about 9 clean outs.

A safety report? I would just create a list of all the guns they sell and the safeties they are equipped with. Like what else are they looking for?

I would place an OPRA for the dash cam video. Im not sure what the Staties use, but they may or may not have been recording. If there was recording, then it will show you used it. If not, then you can go to court like Tbill suggested. If there is video that shows the blinker, they could drop the ticket without even going to court. What ever you do, make sure you follow the directions on the ticket to plead not guilty.

Section 8 Detailed here https://affordablehousingonline.com/housing-search/New-Jersey/Newark/Richardson-Lofts/10078656 More details on the funding http://www.nj.gov/dca/hmfa/media/news/2012/approved/20120625.html

I'm pretty sure that even private entites are held to government standards when they use government funding. So public housing and subsidized low income housing could very easily fall under protections of the Constitution. These guys got millions of dollars from the government to build this place, and receive tax credits. It may be privately owned, but it's government funded. And the courts ruled in many cases for constutional protections when the government funds private business. The place may be owned privately, but it can be treated as a public entity specifically because of the public's stake in the company.

This building is heavily subsidized by the government. I really don't see how they can limit a persons rights when it's receiving tax payer money. Like almost any other private company, once they accept government funds, they must adhere to the same limitations placed upon the government.

That's great! My wife was the same. Although we have only been together a few years. She hates handguns, and I was lucky to get her to go to the range a second time. Broguht the rifles this time. Well now she has her own AR15, light weight too.

It's not really a charitable donation when the state is giving you dollar for dollar tax credits for the same exact services your supposed donation was for.