JackDaWack

Ask for a subpoena, otherwise they have no legal obligation.

Not for much longer according to the teller.

I've needed an ID to deposit cash for years at chase Bank. BoA informed me they won't even have deposit slips anymore, and will use ID and debit cards instead.

If the ATF thinks youre "in business" and simply not "in the hobby"... you can start writing off your "home office" and a percent of utilities.

Yeah, I wouldn't care about 2a stuff when given the choice. But Allendale wouldn't be worse than Rutherford. Allendale 100%

It's not a "red flag". It's just reported. When you file your taxes you just report the loss and move on.

This one will be interesting to say the least. I wonder how the IRS will deal with all these "in the business" vs "hobbiests" identifying factors the ATF is trying to designate. AFAIK, the IRS determines these factors, not the ATF. They have a lot of rules etc that need to be met. Other than forcing these people to get an FFL they will hand them a whole bunch of tax exclusions, deductions and expenses? lol... This will be a fun one to watch.

I dont see these things getting cheaper, really. Unless for inflationary reasons. Battery prices are probably going to go way up in the not so distant future too. Bikes in general have a way of being "redeveloped" each year and are rediculous expensive. These things already run mostly on cheapo Chinese speed controllers and motors you can get for a few hundred bucks off Amazon. There are cheap ones already in price and function. The expensive ones will continue to be expensive to serve as a higher tier product.

At least it's going to better people than illegals.

While any one individual wouldn't be held accountable, the town very much can be.

I made an inference based on your question about personal manufacturing. You seem to be against battling NJ's BS. "Do we really want to?" The answer to the question on every guns rights issue should be met with an unequivocal YES.

So you don't support Bruen because it started a legal battle in this state? Dafuq?

Uh, yes.

Never, say never.

That is a reason I see them splitting this decision along the lines of, you can build your own firearm at home... but manufacturers will be regulated on the sale of DIY kits. The SCOTUS stay is somewhat indicating.

At 80 bucks, no wonder. That's still over double the price pre pandemic. Good score tho if you got what you need.

The PARK must be designated as gun free zone. The park allows firearm hunting so you are GTG. Anyone looking to carry in a state or municipal managed park just needs to see if they allow firearm hunting for deer or waterfowl. Otherwise it might be difficult to know what it's classified if not stated somewhere.

Is there historical relevance for this training? I think not. Courts said they were allowed to issue licenses, haven't visited what that even constitutes yet beyond being "law abiding", and physically capable of safely handling a firearm.

It's really not a good sign, but then again its hardly an argument SCOTUS has looked at the broader implications of building your own firearm. If they manage to pull out a ruling that states a right to construct for personal use, that would be an incredible win regardless where these 80% kits fit into.

Even then, Regulated didn't explicitly mean "trained". It really just ment functional. The militia should function well, and needs be armed. That significantly decreases what constitutes "well regulated" with respect to a qualification. The 2a also doesn't make this exclusionary, nothing states people have to meet an arbitrary bar to jump over to exercises the right of the people. If you can buy and own guns without such training, where does the 2a allow this line be drawn with carrying?

I liked the concept of the serpas, but with the offerings of safariland and their rock solid performance I have to give them the thumbs up if that the type of holster you are looking for.

AFAIK, the NRA ranges requiring membership benefit from that relationship. I'm honestly suprised ANJRPC doesnt require it, hence i've never given the NRA a dime. Regardless, Im just missing how that related to the individuals/ranges who generally promote or advocate for gun rights and their perceived ability to qualify people for CCW. Most places doing the qualifiers promote all of the organizations, many above the NRA.

Where does the NRA fit into the question you were presented with? For all practical purposes, the NRA doesn't advocate in NJ much. We only have the leg of ANJRPC, which does a lot. My thoughts of the NRA wouldn't change the response to my question.

So you believe all the NJ gun advocates should stop qualifying people to carry firearms?

I thought GFH said no one had to requilify with them IF they have a currently issued permit. Not sure of the reasons, but on their site it basically says so.