JackDaWack

You have to be nucking futz to open an FFL with out at least a LLC. I thought there was no regulations on 02 and 03 SOT as an 01 or 07 FFL. You can still sell and bid on state contracts for NFA and sell to LEO and transfer out of state stampable items? As an 07, you would need a NJ manufacturer license, too.

Committing a felony and being a felon are 2 distinct differences, even more so when they have to be classified a fugitive. It is illegal to harbor illegal aliens, so I would have to say I was wrong with that statement. Even DJTs admin didn't pursue that level of enforcement, which makes you wonder.

I agree. I always believed that the shoot was either good, or... not. The only way a trigger job becomes an issue is if it appears you didn't mean to fire the gun, or hit something/one you shouldn't have. Will the prosecution argue you made your gun easier to use and more accurate? Or that you didn't have control of the firearm?

We already have FARS, so this does little to nothing in adding additional exposure for us.

Well, you can't pass a law the would inhibit the feds from doing their job. A state is free to tell the Feds if they want to enforce THEIR federal law, they are on their own. A state is not required to communicate if a federal law is broken. More so, there are no federal laws against harboring illegals, unless of course if they are know fugitives. There has been nothing done to a state that simply said they would not cooperate or communicate with the ATF.

A state like NJ, it's officers do not enforce federal law. A state level police officer lacks the power to arrest someone on federal charges. The supremacy clause is why they can walk into any state and arrest anyone for having broken federal law.

States are not required to enforce federal law, that's how.

It's getting tossed, how soon no one knows. With a preliminary injunction out of Texas, it's now going to ping-pong through the court system. SCOTUS would ultimately rule the same way they did against the EPA last session, even if most arguments thus far are on other constitutional issues. Seems like the rule has a number of pitfals from regulatory issues, vagueness, and the obvious 2a issues.

That's not funny.

Looks like some extra surface area the FATF seems to dislike.

Honestly surprised that we haven't been targeted yet. Op, my wife went on disability and FMLA this past fall. Your looking at 2 months for a check to show up

wait, so if I have owned a maxim defense brace for a few years now im covered under the injunction?

I grew tired of the constantly yearly call to bargain down the price... " sorry no new promotions, oh you really are going to cancel, OK we have the cheaper price now" It's good if it has what you need or want, but I just want to stream music and there are cheaper alternatives. It's also good if you live out in the middle of no where. But around here there is enough tree coverage to get spotty reception in the summer.

It's says to make the barrel 16" or longer, the FATF has always recognized a pinned and welded brake as part of the barrel.

I think the primary point to consider is that if the 3rd Circuit decides to overturn Bumb, Alito could fast track an appeal to the "shadow court" and have that overturned within a few short months.

Do you know how circuit assignments work? He is responsible for ANY "emergency" based appeals, which this will ultimately fall under.

Uhg, no. This is all PRELIMINARY. Nothing has been struck down or upheld, yet. The fee issue doesn't warrant preliminary injunction, the plantiffs can't meet the high standards even if they can show its unconstitutional.

Best case for someone already established with joint accounts is to place notifications on withdrawals and payments. There are also ways to put money into interest bearing accounts under only your name in the name of "retirement".. No one said you couldn't get creative to avoid the unnecessary trust conflict. At the end of the day, money earned is typically communal within a marriage unless otherwise stated.

Not sure how they just throw out a legally binding document unless someone violated an agreement. It's also why you can't half ass a prenuptial, if it's not written clearly and both parties don't have independent counsel, than it can be disputed.

Me and the wife, and she makes 2x my salary, have separate accounts. We decided early on that we would maintain seperate accounts, determine what we each would contribute, and then put money into a joint account for monthly expenses. It's works well. She has sperate savings as do I. Our joint account basically only has a month's worth of bills in it. If we want to make big purchase we then discuss how to pay or save for it. A lot of reasons for this, she has student debt and I don't. I have some inheritance money, and most likely more coming in the future. We don't have to justify what we are spending our own money on etc. Money is the #1 reason people get divorced.

It's a fact at this point we will never see pro gun legislation pass congress. Not in my lifetime.

Not entirely surprised, but has there been no movement on the lawsuits brought against the ATF?

Adding a forward grip to a pistol makes in an AOW, NFA regulated.

lol, I can afford it. We all know damn well the majority of people who cant... If a free ID card to vote is racist..... well...

Probably not, foam of this nature could maybe stretch over the adjustment rails, but my guess is it will probably tear with use.