JackDaWack

A good maul will be high carbon steel all the way through.. you can hit the back side to drive a wedge. Might want to check with your manufacturer, but there wouldn't be a striking side to a maul if they didn't want you to use it. An axe OTH, I wouldn't use the blunt side for anything.

My stove was advertised as taking 24" cuts.. They don't tell you that's on a diagonal... and no one burns like that

A maul has always worked best for me.. its shaped to split wood and not cut it. Plus a good swing and it really does all the work for you. The back side is a sledge, too.

Can't buy those ones

I'm not sure anyone else is using smooth bore barrels... But give them hell! Maybe I will buy one of there rifles just to support them. Screw this state!

So there suing over their non-rifled barrels..

So they are suing because they can't sell SBR's? If so I applaud the effort.

What did the state opinion was prohibited? Is this an Assualt weapons ban challenge for SBR's

Said no one ever.

What, you don't wear eye protection?

Its took me 3 years to strategize all of that.. My wood shed is now right at the end of my driveway... I pull wood twice a week with a garden cart and park it next to the door under my deck. Easy peasy Its sounds miserable at first... but the warm, WARM! House is far worth it without burning a large hole in my wallet. Oil is just way too expensive to run the house at 70. I would go through 200 gallons in just Feb alone, January and March are not far behind. With wood only burning when im home. I go through about 400 gallons of oil a year for heat. I have no idea how people heat their large houses with oil up here in Sussex. Either their houses are cold, or they are paying an enormous amount on money.

What are thoughts on that amish compressed wood? Its like super compressed wood dust. Apparently its burns hot and long.

There is some serious implications if a court ever upheld such a law/regulation. Imagine suing an insurance company for a vehicle if a driver killed someone with that kinda of precedence. If an insurance company is held liable for promoting reckless behavior in their coverage, that kinda applies across the board.. They seem to have made little to no distinction as to why guns are an outlier here, and why only insurance with guns is the issue.. In higher courts, it would be interesting to see how a state could justify that bias. The sad part is these insurance companies are folding.

I think a better explination, after reading more.. is that. A judge ruled the receivers being sold, and even completed.. did not in fact even meet the definition of a receiver per law.

"to prohibit and/or limit the sale, procurement, marketing, or distribution of insurance products that may serve to encourage the improper use of firearms" IMO, it is to scare the insurance companies, not the gun owners.. The insurance companies shouldn't fold so easily, and should fight the law if it comes for them. NY and NJ got the NRA and affiliated insurance through some stupid loophole about being licensed in the state.

Wait, was this a serious discussion?

People were walking out of their store with fully functioning lower receivers classified as firearms, per federal law. This whole business model is a farce to circumvent background checks. Since there is NO definition for manufacturing or a home build in the law, i doubt they were willing to risk it.. What is to stop any company from allowing you to build your own this way? Hey come to my facility... you load in a blank piece of aluminum billet, push a button and leave home with a new receiver.. no background check or nuffin.

Not gonna lie, those big outdoor wood furnaces take whole logs... I've seen guys load them with a front loader.

Force, and maybe a drill. The epoxy is where the magblock/guide enters the baseplate. Hopefully I can just punch it through, don't care if it breaks. The baseplate itself might need some dremeling to clean off the epoxy

I just want to know what rifle comes with a stand.

You're supposed to vent your stove outside your house buddy...

Firearms in NJ will always have that factor of wrong place wrong time. And yes, they would love to make an example out of someone. I used these mag blocks and epoxied them to the base plates.. hoping one day I can break them free.

Not that I disagree but, im sure a lot of prohibited people walked through a place like that... and it's a far cry from being "home made".

Not exactly sure that is how it could work. They have to pick a discernible part to be the firearm and carry the serial number. Way too much confusion to make 2 separate parts the "firearm" when they can be bought separately and swapped between other guns. Is each part considered a different firearm? What could happen, like with Sig, is they serialize the trigger group... which would solve any of these issues. It would be very hard for people to make those parts at home safely. After all, the serialized part of some machine guns is the sear. The difficult part here, is retrospect. You would have to treat pre-fireams the old way and post firearms the news way... The law never anticipated any of this, and with the cat out fo the bag, its gonna be really hard to legislatively enforce any changes with 10's of millions of the guns already out there. What they really should do, is amend the law, so that one of the requirements is that personal manufactured firearms cannot be made with the tools and assistance of any organization.

If you manage to buy it out of state and complete the minor and easy finishing there, you can bring the completed firearm home to NJ with you.