JackDaWack

I use that low ride UBL on my HSGI operator belt, works very nicely. Puts the pistol grip at belt height.

Lol, have you seen their other holsters? That is concealable in comparison.

I think it comes down to wether or not you can get the gear where you need it in the forward most positions on the left and right.

If you brushed up against something hard enough like a garage door frame and removed paint, the clear coat is definitely messed up. Clay bar is for embedded micro debris IN the clear coat.. not so much a layer of paint on top.. after using claybars for years... I have found them extremely limited in what they get off a cars paint surface. Your almost better off using a weak solvent to remove the paint, and getting someone to buff the clear coat. Honestly, if the paint was dry when it transferred, it probably will come right off with a standard hand car washing.

I wonder if they made a mistake? Most plates don't even have pricing on their site.

404 not found

the 11.75"?

I think people should realize that garbage ammo includes "plinking rounds" of every major brand... I wouldn't expect MOA from anything under $15.00/box20. people really underestimate the variances in bullet weights and power charges in high volume manufactured ammo. Half a grain may not seem like much but it really is. @GRIZ Do you know if MM would sell just the barrel?

Pistol length would increase the dwell time for a 10.5 vs carbine... I belive you need to be careful here and do your homework on Port sizes, a lot of companies open them way up to get reliable cycling

My objective has been getting the smallest profile i can while maintaining reliable cycling, i know an inch isn't much but if i can get around it I will.

thats was my understanding. I asked a while ago in their thread what the deal was, never received a response but i guess this is their answer. If they sell just the barrel, I would buy one.

Personal preference. I'd rather the extra length be added to the brace. keeping the overall length of the firearm closest to 26". There is absolutely nothing that a 11.5" cant do that a 12.5 could in which i would use something like this for. It's also far easier to reverse or change the brace position that a pinned muzzle device.

In my readings, 10.5 on a carbine gas system can have issues... 11.5 and up seems to be fine.

So... pin the brace to the buffer tube where u like it and get a shorter barrel?

Pretty sure it's defacto. They sell pistol lowers... they sell pistol uppers... find the right combination and they sell "firearms"

You could pin the brace..

All I can say is the most recent black aces letter states to measure the firearm with the brace collapsed... That would allow for a 11.5 and sba3... The previous letter like I stated was for specifically folding braces... even if they do mention removing braces to measure OAL on fixed tubes... Which one take precedent? I'd rather the 11.5 and a A5 buffer.

Yet, All those people with pre 86 NFA items still have them.... and those who dont, well they dont.

We will have to revisit this conversation in November 2020 to see who really benefits from it. I agree with the overall ruling to an extent, but the EC are there to represent their parties nominee, not who they want to represent, or who the state wants them to represent.

I'm still very unclear as to what the problem was or is. If your cases pass the gauge test, and bullet depth is set according to your chamber measurements? how on earth could you possibly have problems? Perhaps you should stick with loading to max COAL as specified in loading data.

CYA They bought them selves enough room incase anything changes.

PK 90 posted the most recent letter in regards to black aces firearms, states that the measurement is taken with the brace collapsed. Everyone seemed to miss the first paragraph of that original document "correct way to measure a firearm equipped with a stabalizing brace AND A FOLDING ADAPTER.

Just out of curiosity, how would you feel if Trump lost the next election if electors wrote in names again instead of voting in favor for the party they represent? Very close minded statement that the conservatives lose nothing, as this ruling directly enabled republican electorals to help Clinton win an election by taking vote away from the only person capable of beating her. If people were worried before about getting in trouble, imagine what they might do in 2020 now that they have the green light?

Lol, yeah I remembered it from my AquaTeen Hunger Force years..