Soju

I might be interested in 1-2 cases if the price is less than $55 out the door per case, and depending on pick-up details.

A little light reading for you. [url=http://geography.about.com/od/politicalgeography/a/puertoricoisnot.htm/]Puerto Rico is Not a Country[/url] And I wasn't arguing with you. I was actually just trying to inform you that you are wrong.

I agree. Yes. Incorrect. His ridiculous rant made him look like an idiot, but it does nothing to invalidate any valid point or facts he said, as they have no correlation. To automatically dismiss something based on something else is ignorant, even if the medium you hear it from is a giant dickwad. I agree.

What gets lost is that ones personality Has no effect on the merit of their argument or even views. You can be the biggest POS out there and make a good argument just like you can be the most charismatic person and make a crappy argument. Don't forget that.

It's ignorant because PR is part of the US. It is also ignorant because it is no different then the pride (as misguided as it is) you have. To be brutally honest, you don't seem like a very sharp fellow.

As I said, the ignorance is strong with you. You must be operating with a different definition of country then everybody...

I never said it was a state. Considering you guys seemed so up in arms about it, as if someone who wanted to fly a PR flag hates America, I said the PR flag would be 'like the equivalent' to a state. The ignorance is strong with this one. New Jersey has its own flag. Is NJ its own country?

That won't because it happened two and a half years ago.

You guys do realize Puerto Rico is part of the USA and a Puerto Rican flag would like the equivalent of a state flag... Are you against hanging a NJ (or any other state) flag too?

As I said before. He didn't argue that (the term 'assault weapon') because it would be detrimental to his overall point. It wasn't worth it. He picked his battle. And no tin foil hat required. Not a single one of the first ten amendments is beneficial for those in the federal government. None of them are were written with the governments interest in mind. All of them were written for the peoples best interest. A government eroding our rights is not a new concept. It is actually the oldest idea and type of governing there is. That is really what makes the US Constitution so interesting. It is also the reason the government either doesn't, or only selectively follows it.

I have a feeling he was picking battles. By using the term he prevented a useless debate over what is and isn't an 'assault' weapon/rifle as that really is just semantics and most people wouldn't understand. This allowed him the opportunity to make the other points he made. He knows Piers Moron well.

For those who are wondering. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY97rBmXiSo Spot on with the bullying. That is exactly what that douche-bag and hypocrite did (tried to) again. Also spot on about him using dead kids at Sandy Hook as a pedestal to boost his position. Notice he immediately went after the only 4 incidents he knows that used an "assault weapon" and ignored the thousands of other deaths? Weird right? No, not really weird. I'm being sarcastic. Oh, and the "how dare you" line gets old. The only thing one can say when their only position is playing solely off of emotion.

What an ignorant thing to say considering 3 were killed in that incident. It makes it hard to run for cover when you are dead/mortally wounded.

What are forum members doing breaking into your house?

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/treatments/story/2011/08/Study-Americans-use-of-antidepressants-on-the-rise/49828766/1 http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/19/more-than-1-in-10-in-u-s-take-antidepressants/ http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/06/hey-lets-not-get-carried-away-anti-depressants-really-do-help-people/257976/ Just saying. Not that they don't work, but just follow the money.

Isn't that what I said would be said? Oh wait, it is. Isn't that weird. It is almost like I knew that was coming...

This, times whatever very large number you choose.

A little context goes a long way. Instead of just posting some silly photo without saying anything (which was done for the sole purpose of ridicule), a post like your last has some worth. The predominant point of the article from the OP was about prescription drugs. And no, it didn't hit close to home. And again, calling something a conspiracy just because it doesn't fit in your little box serves no purpose. Follow the money and you might find things a bit interesting. Like that the large pharmaceutical companies profit out the ying yang on their drugs that they know have deadly side effects. And what do they do? They push for or pressure those in the health industry to prescribe their drugs even when there isn't a legitimate reason. Or they pay/bribe doctors to do that. The info is out there if you decide to research it. But I imagine it is easier to just call it a conspiracy and go own your merry way. Ignorance truly is bliss.

Not everything that doesn't fit neatly inside your little box that is your perception of reality is a conspiracy. It is funny just how frequent a few of you immediately jump in with a useless post that is nothing more than a stupid little pun about tin foil hats meant as ridicule. Prescription drugs causing eradicate behavior in individuals (including homicidal/suicidal tendencies in some cases) is not a conspiracy. It is a fact. And that isn't even disputed by anyone with the smallest amount of intelligence. I'm pretty sure they don't warn about the risks of these things (like suicide) just for laughs. Paxil, Prozac, Luvox, Lexapro, & Zoloft all warn about suicide risk in young adults, hallucinations, along with a long list of other side effects. Courts in multiple countries have ruled that drugs like Zoloft and Prozac were responsible or caused people to murder, including awarding millions of dollars in compensation/damages. There are literally thousands of cases involving these prescription drugs and their possible link to suicide and homicide.

The view count of all youtube videos stops around 300 temporarily, apparently to verify it is legitimate or something. The video has thousands (tens of) of views already.

He has been issued a wooden gun in its place.

This. The white dot in the front sight of my M&P flew out the first time I shot the thing. Used some white nail polish, years and a few thousand rounds later and it looks just like it did before the dot flew out. I'd imagine some black nail polish would work equally as well. Then some nail polish remover or some white nail polish over the top and you are back to normal.

Now now. I was doing some thinking about this whole "careless not careless" thing, and realized, this lawyer might be right. It is possible it had nothing to do with carelessness. And here is my argument for that. A handgun is a pretty important thing. It isn't something you just happen to forget about. You know what else is pretty important? Your pants. Had instead of him leaving the firearm, he had instead left his pants, I wouldn't call that careless. Say he forgot his pants, and went to the local pub around the corner. When getting out of his car to go inside, he realizes "oh crap! I have no pants on!" That isn't a case of carelessness. That is a case of being a moron. So he wasn't careless. He is just a moron.

If this lawyer can actually convince people of this, I want him as my lawyer. I'm pretty sure if the story he is telling is true, that is about the definition of being careless. Well, I guess maybe he was very careful about losing things...

That is classic. Well done. Well done.