Soju

No, you are entitled to whatever food you are purchasing. If you cannot see how buying food is different than paying taxes, there isn't much that can be said.

Yep. It is unfortunate that it is very common and some studies suggest happens the majority of the time (yikes!) that those who are victims of domestic violence and have to file restraining orders or get some sort of help, unintentionally hurt themselves and end up poor and/or homeless. It is a double edged sword. Do nothing and get hurt physically, or do something and end up in a dire situation financially. Of course I have no idea if this situation specifically dealt with domestic violence.

When someone calls you pal and you're not pals, #&$@ that! Abused.

Dolph Lundgren would have made the best Jack Ryan.

When you are in the customer service business and have no incentive to do it well, this is what happens.

Sure, that is a possibility. It is however contrary to your statement(s) that me and j0n were correcting you on, which is indeed inaccurate.

Still incorrect. There is a legal difference in NJ between a 'flash suppressor/hider' and a 'muzzle break/device'.

You mean something like banning a "Bushmaster Assault Rifle"? No, certainly not.....wait a minute.... http://www.state.nj.us/njsp/info/pdf/firearms/062408_title13ch54.pdf Already in place here in the great state of NJ.

You must be the man.

I sure wish I had a job where following protocol supersedes individual rights, and the law itself. Must be nice to have a prosecutor WITH you to sanction said unlawful activity, 'in the name of safety' or because 'they were following protocol'. But that is just how it is. No recourse. No meaningful rights. Just play the game and hope you don't get screwed over. What is actually right or wrong, lawful or unlawful, means nothing. Anything can happen in the game when you get caught up in the system. A good article to put things in perspective. http://www.itsuptoyo...-out-of-crimes/ Stop with the whole "we have a duty to act and you don't line....same old story gets old. Try something new. Supreme Court rules police have NO duty to protect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html?_r=0

Your friends killed him? You should probably get some new friends.

I was joking. If you were wondering, the intelligent ATF agent in this video you may have seen before is Kelvin Crenshaw.

I'm not a lawyer either but I'm pretty sure that isn't what "within 30 days from the date of receipt of the application" means.

I was under the impression that a judge could only overturn a law based on grounds of unconstitutionality. This is not the case. That would be legislating from the bench, which is not one of their lawful authorities. Then again, the issue is with them not following a law to begin with, so why would they follow others..

Fact.

Hopefully someone educated on firearms is the one who determines the definition, like Kelven Crenshaw.

It has nothing to do with deterring crime.

Confirmed. They are REQUIRED to issue (or deny if the case may be) it to you within 30 days. Here you go. http://law.onecle.com/new-jersey/2c-the-new-jersey-code-of-criminal-justice/58-3.html 2C:58-3. f.

I'd rather have my TV stolen then watch The O'Reilly Factor.

Just checked out a clip of the show on youtube, and the top 2 comments were basically, 'I tap that' and 'She'll def do porn'. Haha!

If it makes you feel any better, many of us on this forum aren't LEO's, and we think you are crazy too.

Not sure what you mean would we 'allow' it, but if the option was AWB or AWB with national conceal carry, of course I'd take that latter.

The one I hear a lot here, well, not a lot, but almost repeatedly, is that NJ gun laws apply in PA.

I'm a strong proponent of training. Personal training. The focus should be on individual training and responsibility, not forced mandatory training classes that have varying degrees of usefulness to different people. You shouldn't have to get permission and you certainly shouldn't have to be forced some sort of 'training'. You should WANT to learn, train, and be responsible. A lot of talk gets thrown around about people just buying a gun, never having shot one in their life, and having no understanding of them, and then walking around carrying them. But I bet the vast majority of people legally carrying are plenty qualified. When is the last time you heard of an incident with a CC'er just willy nilly being stupid? When is the last time you heard of a CC'er acting responsible? Not sure about the first, but for the 2nd, well there is a thread on an example that happened just a couple of days ago...

Easily, it is just that they are corrupt and don't care, not that they don't understand.