SJG

The concurring opinion points out the problem. Under the majority, the FOPA has application where possession is legal in both the departing and arriving jurisdiction and the method of transportation is in a vehicle and the means of transport within the vehicle is per the statute. The statute does not cover transport from your vehicle into the terminal area of the airport to the declaration counter. During that phase, State law applies. Once the declaration is made, the opinion suggests that it does cover from that point, on and off the plane to your destination, and at your destination, through the terminal to your vehicle transport is again controlled by State law. If you have a valid CCW, you need to look to it, and its impact at the departing and then arriving jurisidiction. If you do not have a CCW and you intend to rely on a State exemption, you better be dam sure, it is clearly applicable as the exemptions are construed very narrowly and not liberally in NJ. The majority opinion appears flawed with regard to eliminating transport through the airport for declaration purposes. If you want to chance it in NJ, just be aware of the risk you are taking. You may not have a problem 99 times out of 100, but you may the 100th time and you will become a test case. Just make sure you have 20,000 for legal fees unless you want a public defender to represent you.

Magula loader

$ 4.00 per box of 20 http://www.munireusa.com/7-62x39-mm/

new Ruger

Under the Third Circuits majority opinion (see comments in the concurring opinion) you cannot use the FOPA Act to get the weapon from your vehicle to the declaration counter, because you cannot carry it into the non sanitized portion of the terminal. The question of reliance on a NJ exemption, is less than clear. It is likely if you are arrested, you have a test case. The fact that no one decided to arrest and prosecute you on one occasion does not mean that in the future you are clear. Frankly, prior to the Third Circuits opinion, comfort was found in the FOPA, but the majority opinion wiped that out. Of course, none of this makes any sense, but this is NJ and few things do.

Grabagun $501.82 plus chepo shipping plus $20 to tranfer for members at Woodland Park

I purchased one at PetsSmart for my Jack Russell and they work great

You need to replace the trigger bar, use 4lb firing pin spring,reduced power plunger spring and the 6 lb trigger spirng, for optimum competition trigger control. The stock set us is really designed for self defense

You need to shop around. Places like Gun for Hire, only charge a $20 transfer fee for members if you are purchasing new from an out of state seller who does not charge sales tax. That alone is a considerable savings. If you are purchasing in state there are several good in state vendors, some of whom are forum vendors. You simply need to shop it to get the best deal. Their will always be price fluctuates on the same item. If you are buying in state, you need to factor in time and travel, to see if in the end how much you are really saving. I generally stay away from any forum vendor who advertises an item but refuses to post a price. There are several reasons for that, but in the end, I think it is a mistake to advertise a new item and not mark it with the lowest price you can sell if for while still making a profit. Supply and demand will also impact price. It is always a good idea to have a relationship with more than one in state shop and not put all your eggs in the same basket

2A pros or anti's always link with a cause, anti's link with kids since Newtown, pros should be linking with crime victims, especially home invasions and the right to privacy. What business does the goverment have telling me how many rounds I can have in a mag in the privacy of my home to protect myself and my family. Also, 10 rounds are clearly not enough if you are faced with multiple perps, especially if you need to defend others besides yourself.

check the BATFE Curio and Relic List which is on the internet, see if it is or is not a C&R item, and if it is, if it is exempt.

try blade-tech

What is SSB? Is it all voice? What is the way to go if you do not want to do code and want to do voice and want the ability to go USA, what about Global?

Use a forum sponsor to do the work, they know what the deal is

I believe gun for hire does the same thing for between 25-35 depending on if you are a member or not. $95 is way to high. Frankly, you should be able to do it yourself. It should not take more than 15 minutes.

Heritage in NJ will pin, not sure they will weld.

Mike Molar DDS is your man

Not approved for publication means that case does not get published in the law books and is not prescedential and is not usually cited as primary authority on a legal question. It really does not add any fuel to the pro 2A fire.

Ok so what do you guys recommend for a 2 point sling for AR with a good price point that is relatively easy to transition with?

Signed up for a few AR classes and need to get one, which one do you use?

MAG BAN IS REALLY A GUN BAN! Direct Attack On Gun Owners, Hunters and Sportsmen Would Ban Popular American .22 Rifles! Would Turn Current Owners Into Felons - Up to TEN YEARS in Prison No Grandfathering, No Amnesty "Confiscate, Confiscate, Confiscate" A2006 = GUN BAN Anti-gun legislators' attempt to ban ammunition magazines over 10 rounds (A2006) is a lot more than "just" a magazine ban. It's also a gun ban that would outlaw some of the most popular .22 rifles in the United States, turn their owners into felons, and force them to abandon their property or go to jail for as long as ten years - essentially a confiscation. Whether by stealth or stupidity, A2006 (scheduled to be heard in Assembly committee on Monday, March 3), would make the following change to existing law: "'Assault Firearm' means...A semi-automatic rifle with a fixed magazine capacity exceeding 15 10 rounds." This change would flat-out ban many common and popular tube-fed .22 rifles, including the partial list of guns that would be banned at the bottom of this alert. Those in possession of these popular guns would be turned into felons overnight for possession of so-called "assault" firearms - a second degree crime in New Jersey carrying up to ten years in prison, with a minimum mandatory sentence of 3-5 years, with no chance of parole. A2006 contains no grandfathering to protect current owners, and no amnesty period or procedure for current owners who wish to comply (in ironic contradiction to the legislature's creation of a limited "assault" firearms amnesty period in 2013, which has since expired). Existing owners would be thrown to the wolves - forced to abandon their property or go to prison - a form of confiscation. Although NJ's anti-gun legislators have long denied any intention to confiscate firearms, their true intentions were exposed last year in shocking "hot mic" comments between legislators after a gun control hearing, in which they stated their wish to "confiscate, confiscate, confiscate" firearms. A2006 MAGAZINE BAN Less hidden in A2006 than the gun ban, is its stated purpose: to ban magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. This is based on the naïve and false assumption that removing a particular type of tool from society will somehow make everyone safer. Those bent on doing evil will not be stopped or deterred just because a particular tool becomes less available or unavailable. If box cutters could bring down the World Trade Center, does anyone really believe that banning box cutters will stop the next terrorist attack? The same is true of firearms – banning a particular tool will not deter someone who is determined to do evil. Also, criminals and madmen don't follow magazine bans, or any other type of ban for that matter. Criminals laugh at laws that target hardware. Only law-abiding citizens are affected by hardware bans, because they're the only ones that follow them. The net effect is that the law-abiding voters are put at a disadvantage against the lawless. The only thing that criminals understand is severe punishment. Even if a magic wand could be waved in the land of anti-gun fantasy and remove all 10+ round magazines from the planet, no one would be made any safer, because magazines can be changed very quickly. The theory that a magazine change provides an opportunity to "tackle" an assailant is unsound and unsupported by the weight of the evidence. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that police owe no duty to protect individual citizens from harm, which means that citizens are on their own in an emergency and cannot rely on 911. Yet rather than enhance the ability of citizens to defend themselves when an emergency or home invasion strikes, A2006 would instead tie their hands and put them at a disadvantage against criminals who will ignore the magazine ban. Magazine bans are also completely arbitrary and their logic, if followed, have the potential to lead to a complete ban on all rounds. The idea that an eleventh round is somehow more lethal than the tenth is absurd, and the exact same logic could be applied to a second round in relation to the first, or even the first round itself. The Constitutional right of self-defense is sacrosanct, and a magazine ban directly and significantly interferes with that right. NOTE: A2777 (reasonable deviations in firearms transportation) has still not been posted online. We will have comment on that legislation when it becomes available. PLEASE IMMEDIATELY TELL MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE TO DEFEAT THE A2006 GUN BAN AND MAGAZINE BAN! Charles Mainor (Chair) (D31) [email protected] Phone: 201-536-7851201-536-7851 Fax: 201-536-7854 Gilbert L. Wilson (Vice Chair) (D5) [email protected] Phone: 856-547-4800 Fax: 856-547-5496 Joseph Cryan (D20) [email protected] Phone: 908-624-0880908-624-0880 Fax: 908-624-0587 Gregory P. McGuckin (R10) [email protected] Phone: 732-840-9028732-840-9028 Fax: 732-840-9757 Erik Peterson (R23) [email protected] Phone: 908-238-0251908-238-0251 Fax: 908-238-0256 Nancy J. Pinkin (D18) [email protected] Phone: 732-548-1406732-548-1406 Fax: 732-548-1623 David P. Rible (R30) [email protected] Phone: 732-974-0400732-974-0400 Fax: 732-974-2564 Shavonda E. Sumter (D35) [email protected] Phone: 973-925-7061973-925-7061 Fax: 973-925-7067 THE BAN LIST FOLLOWING IS A PARTIAL LIST OF THE SEMI-AUTO .22 RIFLES* THAT WOULD BE BANNED BY A2006: Browning Auto .22 Rifles Browning Auto-22 Rifle Browning Auto-22 Grade VI Browning BAR .22 Auto Rifle Browning SA-22 Semi-Auto 22 Rifle CBC N66 Auto rifle Glenfield Model 40 rifle Lakefield Arms Model 64B Auto Rifle Marlin Glenfield 60 rifle Marlin 552 BDL rifle Marlin Model 60 Self Loading Rifles Marlin Model 60C Marlin Model 60SB Marlin Model 60S-CF Marlin Model 60SN Marlin Model 60ss Self-Loading Rifle Marlin Model 60 SSK rifle Marlin Model 60 DLX rifle Marlin Glenfield 75C rifle Marlin Model 795 Marlin Model 795SS Marlin Model 922 Magnum Self-Loading Rifle Marlin 990 rifle Marlin Model 990l Self-Loading Rifle Marlin Model 995 Self-Loading Rifle Mossberg 377 Plinkster rifle Mossberg 702 Plinkster Mossberg - Other Variants Norinco Model 22 ATD Rifle Remington 552 rifle Remington 552A rifle Remington 552BDL Speedmaster Rifle Remington Model 522 Viper Autoloading Rifle Remington Nylon 66 rifle Remington Nylon 66AB rifle Remington Nylon 66 Savage 990DL rifle Stevens 987-T rifle Taurus Model 63 rifle Weatherby Mark XXII Tubular rifle Winchester 190 Winchester 290 Winchester- Other Variants Call Send SMS Add to Skype You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype

I like High Exposures suggestion

I understand the proposed solution is "filling glasses" when you look through the glasses it makes it appear that the potholes have been filled.

change the firing pin

i have a new one listed in the Marketplace if anyone is interested. Price includes shipping