SJG

pistol or rifle?

You can have a gun trust in NJ you just can't have it own NFA weapons. Also, the reasoning of the author of this article is incorrect. "Therefore, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 5812 and 5822, an unincorporated trust may lawfully transfer and make machineguns, as it is not a “person” for purposes of the GCA and Section 922 only applies to “persons” as defined by the GCA." The cited statutes have nothing to do with the issue of manufacture of weapons only transfer.

The Senate version restricts law enforcement to 15 rounds and everyone else to 10, both are illogical. The law enforcement community needs to speak up also, unless they are already stuck with 15 rounds under present law.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

Any non resident ccw pemits that are obtainable that pa will recognize?

It seems to me LEO who would be restricted to 15 rounds if this is signed into law are not going to be happy. Perhaps we have a common cause. Would love to see LEO's as well bitch to Christie

Even the NJ Law Journal can't get it straight sutomatic v semi auto. Their stupidity is incredible. Also, most members of the public do not make this distinction. N.J. Legislature Puts Stiff Limits on Magazines for Automatic Weapons Michael Booth, New Jersey Law Journal May 12, 2014 |0 Comments The New Jersey Senate on Monday gave final legislative approval to two gun-control measures: one would reduce the capacity of magazine clips for automatic weapons and another would put restrictions on travel with firearms. Passage came despite stern opposition from gun-rights activists, who argued the bills violate their rights under the Second Amendment while doing nothing to reduce gun violence. One bill would reduce magazine size to 10 rounds from the current maximum of 15, the limit imposed by six other states and the District of Columbia. The other measure would restrict the deviations that gun owners may take from their established routes when they are transporting their weapons. The Senate passed the magazine clip bill, S-2006, in a 22-17 vote, split largely along party lines. The Assembly passed it in March with a 46-31 vote. Representatives of groups supporting the restriction, including Ceasefire NJ and Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, called it a reasonable compromise between protecting public safety and respecting the rights of those who shoot for sport. Also supporting the legislation were the parents of the 20 children shot and killed by Adam Lanza at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. Opponents, led by the National Rifle Association, said the law would restrict only sportsmen and other legal gun users, since Lanza or Dylan Klebold, one of the shooters at Columbine High School in Colorado, would have been unlikely to comply. Among those testifying in opposition at a March hearing before the Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee was Shyanne Roberts, a 9-year-old competitive shooter from Franklin Township, Gloucester County, who said the Glock pistol she uses in competition would be left “worthless” if the bill is enacted and that she and her family would have to consider moving out of state. If the bill is enacted, owners of ammunition clips holding more than 10 rounds would have three months to comply with the new restriction. Read more: http://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202654987226/N.J.-Legislature-Puts-Stiff-Limits-on-Magazines-for-Automatic-Weapons#ixzz31XjnoUbU

We would have a better chance if NJ did not permit any form of carry and you can bet the dems would vote for that. Perhaps its time to reverse our position to achieve the desired end?

As you know, the N.J. Supreme Court has granted review in a Second Amendment case. If the NJ Court does not reverse the Appellate Division, on 2nd Amendment grounds, a petition for certiorari can be filed again with the U. S. Supreme Court. It is possible that the court denied review in Drake because they wanted the NJ Supreme Court to see what our Supreme Court would do with the issue.

Chrome lined barrels are easier to clean, less susceptible to corrosive ammo (rust/pitting/etc), and can last several thousand rounds longer than a basic chrome moly barrel. Sure, you can easily get away with using chrome moly, but if you can afford it, why not? Now that Century makes the same rifle with chrome, why not go for it? If they Nitride treated the non chrome lined, that would be acceptable, but they don't. I don't pin my own brakes, I would like to see a picture of an improperly drilled bore, if you have one. Good to know.

Llning is #3, not #2, and the answer is nothing, you take the lining as it comes #2 the right spring arm "leg" bend was elevated higher then the one on the left, as a result, insufficient spring pressure on the right bar, simple to fix, just adjusted the bend config same as the left and now it functions like the left arm. Prior to correction, I would have to exert slight pressure with the outside of my index finger, on the rear of the trigger, in order to achieve a reset.

Just tell us if was new ammo or a reload

1. They are, but cover mounted rails are problematic on this platform based on my personal experience. 2. I own a new chome lined one that has this problem, which manifested itself after three mags. I believe I have corrected it, and will see when I go to the range. T 3 Posts exchanged by users on the Century 39 Group 4. Perhaps, but the problem was not evident until the rifle had approximately 150 rounds through it. I decided to take a chance with Century. As you can see, there are alot of pluses also

Cons:1. No side mount, so no way to mount a scope that will not lose its zero. 2.While you get a Tapco G2 trigger, the hammer spring is very cheap, is not braided wire, like on the Saiga, has minimal tension. If the spring lacks proper factory bends, its "legs" may displace during firing-- and the trigger will not reset correctly. You will not notice this problem unless the rilfe is feeding rounds. This is something that the factory needs to be concerned with. It is easily corrected, however, if you know what you are doing. 3. The chrome lined version does not have a chrome lined gas tube and the chrome lining appears to be thin in certain areas 4. The finish on the wood is excellent, but the fit on the hand guard could be improved, The handguard may feel a little loose after the rilfe heats up. The problem does not effect function and is more a cosmetic issue. 5. The manual it comes with is the s the same manual for the centurion 39 tactical model. You can get by with it, but Century should really have a manual for the Classic Pros: 1 You get a lot of rifle for your money 2 The receiver is milled, not stamped, the weight distribution is excellent, and it is accurate with the provided iron sights. 3 You have the option of chrome lined or non chrome lined. However, it it not clear how the non chrome lined barrel is treated. Spend a few more bucks and get the chrome lined version. 4 Seems to work fine with different types of Ak mags

PWS FSC 556 Spike's Dynacomp

No duty to retreat if the bear breaks into your house. Querry, do you have a duty to retreat before you can shoot the bear outside? Clearly if an attack is in progress, no. Can you shoot the bear if it simply wanders onto your property, looks mean and is very hungry?

Waiting to pick up the Centurion 39 classic ak47 style milled receiver with chrome lined barrel all usa made by Century. Any idea if the mags will work with this rifle?

You can do the conversion without a pistol grip and keep it in NJ with a muzzle break on it. However, you have to ask yourself if it is worth it. If you want a pistol grip, you would have to keep it in a free state.

If you have to damage or destroy the magazine to undue the modification so that it will not function as intended you are good to go. However, there are modifications to limit capacity, that would not result in significant damage or destruction of the magazine that might also suffice---- provided they are not easily undone--- and therein lies the dispute. Unfortunately, in the absence of an Appellate Court opinion on the issue, there is no definitive answer.

Sorry for your loss--been there, several times--I kind of think of it this way, the last thing, I was able to do is to relieve my dog from any suffering, and that counts for alot. Eventually, you will see them all on the other side---life is just a matter of time

perfect for a conversion, no need to pay 500 for a new one that you are going to strip to this condition anyway

Why doin't you tell us what your idea is?

You missed the opportunity to buy my M&P15FT, because you hesitated and did not "pull the trigger"----"he who hesitates is lost" Another forum member grabbed it and loves it---that could have been you!

I have a G34 Gen4 that I did a "trigger job" on (as you know the springs and trigger bar are inexpensive), it shoots great especially with the various back strap options, which include a modified 1911 type backstrap. I don't know anything about the other weapon, but I love Glocks, so what can I say. With super availability of parts and holsters, it would be my choice.

I am not aware of any firearm appropriate for fishing, unless you are using a bang stick in case of a shark attack. I am also not aware of any fishing regulation that specifies that it is appropriate to fish with a specified firearm