Old Glock guy

Also, Shooting USA, Shooting Gallery and Best Defense. (I believe some of those are currently between seasons.)

Yes, I was going to recommend boresnakes.

Or just grab one off the shelf and start shooting. Later, you can add an optic, upgrade the trigger, throw on a sling, pretty much whatever you want. Stag Arms makes a drop in BCG that lets you shoot .22lr out of your same gun, so you have that option as well, if .22lr ever becomes available again.

Nice Howard! Kind of like Lojack on steroids.

Unfortunately, it's not really much of a choice. If the guy had been carrying illegally, he would have had a chance to save his life. But had he been successful, he would have been facing hard prison time for felony arrests, both for possession of a weapon and for any injuries or worse he might have caused. God, this state just sucks!

Bolling would be a great ally to have for our project of flooding the state with CCW applications.

LOL to that! Maybe malls should start closing at 3:00 PM, to force criminals to get to work earlier. BTW, why is no one connecting the dots to the obvious solution that we should be allowed to defend ourselves?

It's sick that our state defines justifiable need so narrowly. How about, "There have been a lot of carjackings (and other shootings), and I fear for my life." When are we going to be allowed to defend ourselves against these predatory dirtbags?

That was the first question that went through my mind when I read this. Just what we need, more pressure on 9mm ammo prices!

Ditto.

Not vladtepes, but I use an Aimpoint Pro on my Stag Arms Model 2, and it works just fine with both eyes open. I'm certainly no expert, but I zeroed it the best I could with the iron sights, then just set the red dot to coincide with the front sightpost, and voila, I was on target. I'm not a precision shooter, but I can shoot decent groups with it at 50-100 yards. Have not tried beyond that.

Thanks. I found those "spoilers" to be interesting, but not overly revealing, if anyone is interested in checking them out. Wink-wink (your punctuation is way too complicated for me), I agree with most of your points. But as for the walker crossing the river, I think when the mom saw him swept away by the current, she had a false sense of security, so she was not paying attention when the underground walker (presumably submerged in a previous flood) reached up and grabbed her daughter. Anyone interested in further discussion can go here: http://www.walkingdeadforums.com/forum/ And yes, I'll admit that I've poked around there a bit. Oh, and I would guess that the writers will have more fun with them wandering around as separate groups for awhile, trying to find each other, than having them meet at a rally point.

It's blissful there when no one is around. Must have been beautiful with the snow cover.

I am not familiar with the P22, but I can almost guarantee that your wife will love the SR22. Plus, it shoots any .22 ammo. IDK if that's true for the other.

Sounds like fun, depending on where and when.

I posted this a couple of years ago: http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php/topic/23256-do-i-need-a-knife-serious-question/ I wouldn't say I have a pile, but between fixed blades and folders, I now have more than ten.

I'm sure you are correct.

Great selection of targets here, most of them relatively inexpensive if purchased in quantity: http://www.letargets.com/

I thought I was the only one who had a problem with that. Good to hear getting brass in the face bothers others as well. Recently, I was at GFH with a couple of shotguns. I asked the RO if he would like to put me away from the handful of other shooters, who all had handguns. He laughed, and said to me, "Hey, this is a shooting range, not a library!"

Norseman, yes I'm with you on that. Of course, anyone is free to write what they want, but I agree with you and others who have said that having almost everyone write the same thing would eliminate one of the variables.

I totally agree with this. Some people still seem to be thinking that if we can just dazzle them with some incredible, new way of explaining justifiable need, then they can get approved. Never going to happen. The point is to demonstrate by 1000 denials that their "justifiable need" is arbitrary, and is being used to deny us our Constitutional right.

I like this as well. It cites legal precedent, and does not try to grovel to NJ's requirement for unique "justifiable need." But I'm still not sure what our course of action will be. We get lots of denials, ideally 1000's. We publicize it via Project Veritas or something similar. Then what? The way I see it, we can either: 1.) Hope that legislators are so embarrassed by their stance, that they decide to immediately pass legislation to allow concealed carry. (I'm not betting on this one.) Or, 2.) We petition the courts for an order to allow concealed carry. Can we do that? Can the AG issue an executive order at our request? So while I'm all for this, what's our next move after the mass rejections and publicity?

Anybody have any intel from tonight's NJ2AS meeting?

What's the purpose of the interview? I'm pretty sure he can't arbitrarily deny you because he feels you're not gun-worthy based on speaking with you.

The red laser in my SIRT pistol works fine with the Laserlyte targets. The green does not. Advantages of the SIRT vs. a Laserlyte cartridge: 1.) Completely safe for dry fire, since it's not really a gun. 2.) Closely mimics the size and weight of a Glock 17. 3.) No need to re-rack the slide between shots. Disadvantages: 1.) Cost 2.) Unless you carry and use a Glock 17, it's not the same gun you use.