leahcim

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Singing a traditional and/or patriotic song in a public school is not Congress making a law respecting an establishment of religion.

Sorry--should have said they can be not re-appointed. No wonder I never see judges on the ballot since I moved here. As for the original question--I have considered applying. But knowing it would be an almost pointless exercise, could cause problems when I move out of state, and could get expensive and use up a lot of time better spent at the range; I decided against that fight.

Yes, but they can be not re-elected. And I can imagine the campaign ads now--against a judge who approved a CCW permit that was later used in commission of a crime.

The way I understand the law, one is presumed innocent until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt (in criminal matters). While one may be actually guilty, guilt must be proven IAW proper legal process to establish a legal judgement of guilt.

I was beside myself when I read the original judge refusing THREE TIMES the jury's request for the allowable exceptions for transporting firearms. The moving exception was brought up during the trial, and the jury ask (THREE TIMES) for further information on the law and exceptions. The condescending judge told them that it had no bearing, did not apply here--why not provide the law as requested and let the jury decide?? THat is how our system works! Yeah, I don't get that at all. I hope they appeal that HP ruling and get some clarification. Are you supposed to leave your legally owned HP ammo behind when you move????

Yeah, because if the Aitken opinion is correct on this (no "moving exception" for transporting HP) then there is no legal way to transfer legally owned HP ammo if you move to a new house. Unless maybe you could fed-ex it? That seems ridiculous.

Exemptions were mentioned at trial. According to the opinion (p.10), "During deliberations, the jury asked about the exemptions, which had been mentioned during the trial despite the fact that they were not charged." and The note [from the jury] read: "Please define the exceptions to the law for all three charges. That is it was announced that 'moving is an exception.' We need to be clear of all exceptions, if any, for each charge."

According to the opinion, they could technically hear the case again, but thanks to Gov. Christie's commutation, that would be pointless. Footnote 8 on the opinon: "Although the State may elect to pursue a retrial, we note that the State has conceded that the gubernatorial commutation of the custodial sentence precludes imposition of any custodial sentence following such a retrial" I absolutely do not understand and cannot comprehend the trial judge refusing THREE requests from the jury regarding the moving exemptions for transport of firearms. They asked for it THREE times, and the judge tells them they do not need to consider that.

http://gunnuts.net/ http://letsgorideabike.com/blog/ http://www.guns-n-gardens.com/

Didn't the Plaxico incident involve an AD though? I can see that resulting in a tougher punishment.

So is a realtor considered self-employed? And would an open house be considered a temporary place of business of said realtor? Or would she have the right to carry within the confines of the open house because it is a private home??? Also, does anyone have experience using the Kimber blaster? It sure looks cool, but Gun Nuts (Shelley Rae) reviewed it and did not seem to like it due to the short blast and difficulty aiming (http://gunnuts.net/2011/10/21/effective-pepper-spray/) I bet NJ laws would like to outlaw it too because it looks too much like a gun.

I don't think so. I am no legal scholar, but the way I read the last sentence Sec 926D(a) it does not apply to residents of the state that obtain permits in other states: Sec. 926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms `(a) Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof (except as provided in subsection (b)), a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, and who is carrying a valid identification document containing a photograph of the person, and a valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm, may possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State, other than the State of residence of the person, that-- `(1) has a statute that allows residents of the State to obtain licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms; or `(2) does not prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms by residents of the State for lawful purposes. So, perversely, people living in PA could CCW in NJ, but not residents of NJ!

I got a similar response from Senator Lautenberg. In my email to him I stated that I applaud his concern over states rights (which he cited as a reason to oppose the bill) but pointed out that 2A trumps 10A. But I am happy just knowing that he is keeping my views in mind as he goes about the people's business. I know he's got my back ;-) Thank you for contacting me about concealed weapons. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue. As you may know, the “National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act” (H.R. 822) would allow individuals who have permits to carry concealed firearms in their home states to have their concealed carry permits recognized in other states that also allow concealed firearms to be carried. This legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives and is currently pending before the House Judiciary Committee. Similar legislation has not been introduced in the Senate. Please be assured that I will keep your views in mind should this or similar legislation be considered in the Senate. Thank you again for contacting me. FRL: mts Sincerely,

Personally I try to avoid any food products that contain any ingredient that I do not recognise or do not have in my own kitchen--something like 4-methylimidazole would not pass. I also try to avoid anything with added colors--it does not affect the taste so I do not need the extra color. As long as the ingredients are clearly and accurately listed--so I can make an informed choice--the government should leave that choice (to consume it or not) to me. I take responsibility for what I eat and drink, the state has no business regulating it.

The way the law reads: Yes. They do not have to be locked either (unless they are transported by automobile AND you opt to put them in the trunk)--just make sure the guns are unloaded and in a closed and fastened case or securely tied package. The way I read it, the gun has to be INSIDE something. But I think a plastic shopping bag would suffice as long as it is securely tied. I plan to ride my bike about 10 miles to the range this Spring. I have rack/panniers on one of my bikes and plan to put the guns and ammo in my panniers. If you are obviously carrying a long gun, I would not be suprised if you are questioned by LEO, but I am thinking with handguns there would be no reason for them to even ask...unless they are staking out the range. "shall be carried unloaded and contained in a closed and fastened case, gunbox, securely tied package, or locked in the trunk of the automobile in which it is being transported, and in the course of travel shall include only such deviations as are reasonably necessary under the circumstances."

I used to get an attitude when pulled over, but that got to be expensive (plus I was young and stupid then). Now I realize that this has to be one of the more dangerous part of the job--so I keep my hands on the wheel, open palm; respond with either "Yes sir" or "No sir" and try to be respectful. I do not understand mature people taking an attitude--even if you fake it, it is going to cost you a lot less. I like Chris Rock's old video on how not to get your a$$ kicked by the police (Sorry it is low-def): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-880897175401400927#

Do not know about the other stuff, but the guns and ammo are perfectly legal for sale at flea markets in VA. As long as one posseses a valid VA DL (or anny adjacent state except for MD and DC) There were several tables with guns and 100 round magazines. We had a serious discussion about moving to Virginia after that!

Same in VA and TX. I was at a flea market--YES, a FLEA MARKET!-- in VA recently and the guy told me that to purchase I only needed a valid VA DL. Several tables had firearms, and magazines spread out on open-air tables. Would be great if we could do that at Englishtown or Columbus! As for NJ, I have been asked only for FID at stores (not always), never for P2P. Ranges never seem to ask though.

I know that the Generac and B&S (probably Kohler too) come with a housing, but I am not sure if it is just for weather or provides some sound insulation as well. I was thinking of building a doghouse around it--with some rigid, sound-insulating foam--to cut the noise and also to disguise it a bit and make it seem like I have a large dog.

Most codes require a transfer switch--or some sort of interlock--which will isolate the generator from the utility. Typically you will run the circuits you wish to back up--from your main box over to the TS and back. The TS has only two positions--one powers the backed-up circuits from the utility, the other from the generator. So there is no way to backfeed into the utility (assuming your house wiring is up to code as well). I have been looking at the Generac 10KW and 14KW that come packaged with an automatic TS--when you lose power it will automatically fire up the generator and switch over. It also performs a weekly maintenance startup. And it runs on LP or NG. Also I have noticed on the specs that the output is about 10% lower when running on NG than LP. The 10KW is about $2800 http://www.generac.com/Residential/Guardian/Products/Guardian_Series_10_kW/ http://www.electricgeneratorsdirect.com/quick_search.php

Based on the conversation dialogue provided, the caller never identified himself as an LEO--can it be considered "lying to police" if they do not identify who they are--seems it is just lying. I do not understand why the LEO would refuse to self-identify as soon as the phone is answered though. Personally I would have ignored the question and responded with only a request for identification.

If you can answer in a polite and non-confrontational way you should be okay--you may end up getting the ticket (if that is why you were stopped) vs. leniency within LEOs discretion. I know if you become confrontational you may win the argument, but drive away with maximum tickets for whatever else the LEO can find beyond your primary offence. When I am stopped I keep my hands visible at all times, and respond only with "yes sir" or "no sir" and that seems to help. I try to imagine it from the LEO perspective, where any traffic stop could potentially go very bad. That being said, I would (respectfully) never allow a search of my car on a traffic stop without PC and a warrant. AND I have NEVER had an LEO request to search my car--They know the law and I really do not think they would ask unless they have PC.

I just don't get the causal link--is he trying to implly that the guns that are not being bought due to "one gun per month" would have been used for criminal activity? Even if crime is down, he does not show any causal connection to the one-gun-a-month law--and you know he would if there was one.

Is there any legal proscription regarding carrying--open or concealed--within the confines of my property boundaries at my residence? Does it somehow depend on local discharge laws? Thank you!