High Exposure

http://www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php/topic/79040-usg-sues-l3-for-fraud-over-eotech-issues/?fromsearch=1

Not me buddy. I have shot every steel match I have ever attended with a Glock 35.

Almost.... I have 6 Glocks and a Kahr PM9. I have to carry a Glock at work, so why have anything else? I have had a 1911, Sig 226, HK P2000, M&P .45, at different times, and there are a few other guns I want, but I'm not spending the time or money to shoot and train with them when I have to carry the G22. The Kahr fills a niche and is close enough in feel and manual of arms that I make an exception, and I rarely shoot it more than a mandatory qualification 2 times a year. I'll stick with Glocks until I don't have to. Then I'll start shooting other stuff.

They can regularly headshot a moving Walker at 50 yards, with a handgun, at a full sprint, with one hand, in a single shot, but.... of they spring an ambush, at 15 yards, from a fixed position, with rifles, they suddenly can't hit shit!

Tuna, I have shot a 303. Many times with many ammunition types. It fills a role. HD is not it. Also, the glass breaker rounds suck and don't break glass very well. They ricochet back at the shooter pretty hard though. This: Is what I have a problem with. This statement is pure unadulterated garbage. I know because I have shot people with pepper balls and guess what happened? Jack and shit. Hell, some people use them as regular paintball guns for crying out loud. Bottom line, anything that relies on only pain compliance to incapacitate is not guaranteed]/i] to stop anything in one round. I have seen guy's shrug of 40mm sponge rounds, 12g less lethal bean bags, and pepper balls. Barring a CNS hit, nothing you can hold in 2 hands is guaranteed to stop a determined attacker in one shot. Nothing. And a FN303 round can't get to the CNS unless it has easy access - like the girl in Boston that took one in the eye. If handgun, shotgun, and rifle rounds routinely fail to stop determined attackers, a paintball on steroids won't either. Sorry.

You mean this one with no sights:

Roadhouse Rules: "Everyone gets one before anyone gets seconds." It is one TTP for use when engaging multiple targets. Each target gets 1 round center mass before you start conducting hammer pairs, NSRs, or failure drills.

Was 3 on 1 a fair fight? In any event, sure, it is OK to be fair minded after a fight, never before or during.

Nothing will keep out any determined person. Have I mentioned that I really hate biometric safes?

I wonder if the kid behind the gun used roadhouse rules or not...

Looks like the USSOCOM selected MLOK. http://soldiersystems.net/2017/03/31/ussocom-selects-m-lok-for-weapon-programs/ Of additional note, the US Army directed H&K to integrate an M-LOK rail (designed by Geissele) on the new Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System rifle which is an indication of wider DOD adoption of M-Lok.

This was posted in the defensive firearms thread on 3/27: http://www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php/topic/69120-defensive-firearm-use/page-8#entry1103283

You would be surprised.....

It is what it is. It is awesome that you respect your wife's wishes as much as you do to find alternative ways to keep your home safe and your wife happy.

Yup. And if that's the case, you need to work around it. Marriage is a partnership and people have strong feelings about guns in their homes. A compromise needs to be reached. If that compromise is not conducive to having a firearm handy to defend hearth and home, then a new plan needs to be developed. That sounds like what the OP is in the process of doing. Unfortunately, this idea should be a no go - so back to the drawing board. Personally, a combination of reasonable security (inaccessible and/or inoperable) and thorough education (for everyone in the household) would be in order.

I don't like biometric safes. If your hands are wet or dirty they don't work. If you use the wrong finger, or use a funny angle they can be temperamental.

Yup, That was in Boston. Someone was killed with a knife, a bat, a toaster, and a pair of rollerblades the same week. You going to use them for HD? Yes, the potential to kill is there with any less lethal projectile. That doesn't mean it's the right choice for HD. Have you ever used one? I have. It has a niche role in use of force options - and it isn't to replace deadly force. You want to use an FN303 (we haven't even talked about where to get one and ammo for it as a non-LEO, or the fact that the projectiles are fin-stabilized and won't work in a paintball gun) good luck. It's your life, your family, your choice.

That's what the literature says. Reading through it sounds like there are 2 options for Satans Childres: a Shell Deflector and a Lefty Bolt.

Handgun rounds regularly fail to stop bad guys before they kill good guys. The FN303 WILL NOT stop a bad guy in his tracks consistently enough to rely on it to keep you or your family safe. False. Nothing that relys on solely on pain for compliance, including rounds from a firearm that don't hit something critical, will stop someone that doesn't care about pain in their tracks. Putting all other issues - legal, procedural, and tactical - aside for a moment and say, less-lethal was a good choice for HD (hint, it's not) - I *might* try a 40mm impact round if I was trying real hard to not have to kill someone that needed killing, but I would have lethal cover and a plan on what to do next when the round failed.

Even if you could get a 10 gallon bucket - OC will never be an appropriate selection for a deadly force encounter.

This is the southpaw version. Move the shell deflector to the other side and BOOM it is wrong handed.

Looks like it uses AUG mags. I may wait for a NATO stock version. Seems silly to invest in more reduced capacity mags...

No

I am very interested - but I am not a fan of being an early adopter of any new gun. I have an MSAR - love it, but like you said, parts are an issue. Rumor has it that initial pricing is around $2000.00