High Exposure

Do dogs think in barks?

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm pretty sure that on an interstate transfer, the firearm has to go through a FFL at the receiver's end. You can't just drive to Maine, take control of the rifle, and drive home. If it comes into a Jersey FFL as a non-compliant rifle, it is classified as an "Assault Weapon" and has to be logged into their book along with the name of the purchaser prior to completing the compliance work. If it comes in to the FFL in NJ as a fully complaint rifle, no entry needs to be made and nothing other than a COE, payment of whatever transfer fee, and a NICS check is completed at pick up. For many people, the second method is preferable to the first - understandably so. I am sure one of our FFL members will come by and set it straight.

Maks, I have to have non-shedding dogs with hair myself. We got a Kerry Blue Terrier last year. She is amazing. Smart and sweet and it looks like she will be a great frisbee dog. We bring her to the groomers once every other month with an occasional bath at home and she is good to go. I have friends with a Puli and another with a Komondor. Good dogs but lots of work to keep their coats healthy and they are very high energy.

You can put any standard AR zipper on any standard AR lower. The parts will fit fine.

Better yet, have the work done in Maine before it is shipped to NJ so it never gets entered in the FFL's book as an "assault weapon" that requires compliance work. Conpliance work = slapping a new NJ compliant upper on it or making the current upper NJ compliant (perm attaching a brake/comp, removing bayo lug) before shipping.

A friend will help you move. A best friend will help you move bodies.

Bro, seriously? You have to start adding a little context. A link every now and then wouldn't hurt either.....

Nope. Nuttin' yet.

In the early 1980s Colt developed and manufactured a 9mm Sub Gun (current model numbers R0991 and R0992) on an AR type platform at the request of the USMC for use with their Fleet Security Forces. They are built to a "mil-spec"and use proprietary magazines based on Uzi mags. I have found them to be unreliable with anything other than .mil 9mm ball ammo.

https://www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/86372-taser-stun-gun-law/#comment-1110867

Incorrect. For example, you can put an A2 flash hider on a Mini 14, a Remington 700, an M1 Garand, a Mossberg MVP, or an SKS. ETA: Gotcha steve. Posting simultaneously.

Incorrect. No flash hider is illegal in and of itself. You just can't put a device that is sold as a flash hider on a semi auto rifle that already has 2 "evil" features. On an AR type rifle, the detachable magazine and pistol grip are the existing "evil" features. So that means you can't have a collapsing stock, bayonet lug, grenade launcher, or flash hider.

Spitballing here, but - http://www.magazineblocks.com/magento/products/magblock-kits/ak47.html and get someone to weld the floorplates. ETA: I am not a lawyer and don't know if that would satisfy your understanding of "Permanent".

I don't understand your point Ray. You get the same benefit from using a direct attach system as a LEO, Mil, or citizen if you are attaching anything to your handguard - Light and Grip included. What's the downside to using a direct attach system on a rifle that isn't for a LEO or Mil? They typically cost a little less and weigh a lot less, than full railed systems (less matrial and less machining) and, if of similar quality, are priced around the same as other tube type hand guards that require a rail section to secure accessories (you can't compare a UTG model to a Daniel Defense model, etc...) Like I said many times earlier, the $30 Magpul Plastic Handguards (which are now MLOK by the way ) are fine if you are just installing a light and a grip - my Patrol Rifle and HD rifle are both set up this way. But.... If you are going to go the extra mile and use a free float tube, and I can understand not retrofitting existing systems that are adequate, to discount a lighter, simpler, stronger system out of hand in favor of a less capable system seems short sighted.

Just so we are all on the same page - the KeyMod and MLOK system aren't for the attachment of rail sections*. They enable you to remove the rail sections for direct attachment of your accessories to the rail. This removes weight, bulk, and another set of bolts/screws necessary to make the interface that can fail. * You can use it to attach a rail section if your accessory is not KM/MLOK comparable and requires a 1913 interface.

Yup. Rails are fine. They work and will continue to work for quite some time. But, if you want to cut some weight, ditching a rail for a tube is an easy and affordable way to drop ounces. I also have come to prefer the slimmer feel of the tube type hand guards, and the elimination of the rail sections streamlines everything, removes a failure point, and cuts even more weight. Win win win. (Big fan of the Troy tubes for guns with a standard AR barrel nut and pinned muzzle device, and the ALG EMR on new builds. Looking hard at the Hodge tubes now as well for any new builds that will be using a laser) In reality, If you are not putting anything other than a vert grip and a white light on your hand guards, the plastic Magpul MOE or MLOK hand guards will do everything you need in an effective, lightweight, and very affordable package - including direct attachment of light mounts and grips without needing a rail section.

Being discussed here: https://www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/84955-m-lok-or-keymod/&do=findComment&comment=1110285

Ares Gear Ranger or Aegis belts - Same belts, different buckles. IMO the best belt out there for CCW hands down, I have two - one black and one brown. I have worn one every day for the last 6-7 years. If you have to have leather, the Comp Tac Kydex Reinforced Leather belt is hard to beat and is what I wear if I am in a suit.

Cool! Our hummingbird feeder went out last week. We have had a lot of traffic at it. They are amazing creatures.

Yes. Midwest PX sells excellent products.