SpacemanFry

Wow, that was amazing.

Man that was a nailbitter to the end.... phew!!

Awesome I can't wait!

Your question is a bit unclear. The $400 Capital Contribution is one time only unless you lapse your membership for 2 years. Also there is a yearly membership fee of $250 + 7% tax - credits. PS - I too will be joining this Wed. It's an awesome range.

That looks really cool. Hope Remington comes out with something similar.

There's a bunch of good links in this thread: http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/28129-steel-targets-whos-good/page__hl__ar500__fromsearch__1 I too have been looking at getting a bunch of steel targets. I'm going to start with a set of paper/cardboard target holders and slowly acquire steel targets.

Ok cool keep us posted. Approximately what's very soon?

Thanks, they look great.

Where did you get the H foldable stands? The CJ pits is where I intend to use them so I figure I'll get a bunch of tent stakes. I just want to be able to fit a whole bunch of stands in my trunk if needed along with everything else.

LOL, if I actually put on bumper stickers I'd totally get one of those TSA ones. Now that I think about it I should get one for my carryon bag when I travel. Maybe a T-shirt too

Anyone try these target stands from GT Targets, specifically the new foldable style? http://www.gttargets.com/paperstands.htm

Doomsday scenarios appeal to a wide range of interests and such make for some popular shows. They appeal to people that like the idea of rugged survivalism, to people who believe we will destroy ourselves, to people who believe humans are at their best in doomsday scenarios, to people who believe humans are at their worst in doomsday scenarios, people who like to plan ahead, people who feel as just a cog in the machine in their normal lives and like to fantasize about rising to the challenge etc. Also doomsday scenarios allow the show to concentrate on the drama of a small group of people while removing societal influences which generally makes for a more interesting show.

Umm that was pretty pointless. That was just a retarded article with no point whatsoever.

Why would you assume they were used in a crime or stolen?? WTF is wrong with us that we assume someone was a criminal just because they didn't have an FPID? As stated, there are many legal ways to acquire firearms without an FPID or P2P. He may have inherited the guns himself from someone, he may have purchased them prior to the creation of FPIDs, he may have bought them when he lived in another less-gestapo state. Only issue is making sure the shotgun meets the legal size requirements. If it doesn't you can easily remove the barrel and destroy it and replace it with a new barrel. The same for the stock if needed to make the overall length.

I fail to see how being so delusional that you believe that "god" actually watches your game and guides it is a good role model... though I guess you quantified that with "better than anybody else in NFL" which is probably true. I don't consider calling him a douchebag as "hating" on him. I don't hate the guy or have any strong emotions about it, but I do find him as big of a douchebag as all the other tools out there that say stupid **** like "I'd like to thank Jesus my lord an savior for my win tonight" etc.

Welcome fellow Mercer-ite!

Hmmm... I've never been to OK. Might be a good time to plan a trip there during next year's event.

Well guess I'll never shop there. It boggles my mind that people would run a business like this.

I hate it when people stop by unannounced. We live in a day and age when everybody has a cell phone so if you want to stop by just give a quick call or text, it's not that complicated. My dog (an 80lb boxer), who is generally like the most gentle and submissive dog I've known, will go nuts if the bell rings and that usually scares off most solicitors.

The sad truth is that most people are as apathetic about this as they are about most other issues. That's exactly why big internet companies/names are doing this so they can actually get people to pay attention.

Maybe it was the sounds of NJ craping all over our 2a rights??

Here's the better question. What cold weather gear do you use when shooting in the cold?

Usually an aftermarket extension. Do a search for it you'll find lots made specifically for different models.

(e) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States. Also need I remind you that the constitution says our right to bear arms shall not be infringed? How is that holding up? The above paragraph could have been phrased a lot clearer and without leaving any doubt or loopholes. It was written like that on purpose so that if push came to shove the gov could talk their way around it. When it comes to these matters nothing must be left up to interpretation.

Did this in the other thread you asked before it got moved: You can read the full thing here if you want: http://www.gpo.gov/f...12hr1540enr.pdf Sec 1021 and 1022 are the main controversial culprits. Sec 1022 actually does have a provision that exempts US citizens, but Sec 1021 is the more troublesome portion anyway because it explicitly allows indefinite detention without trial of people that are found to have "commited a belligerent act against US or it's allies or provided support to its enemies". Those are very poorly defined terms (ie what's a belligerent act or what constitutes support?) Then it goes to say in a very sneaky language that this section shall not be construed to affect existing laws or authorities for persons captured or arrested in the United States. That's a very slippery slope. So technically anytime you step outside the US you can be arrested and transferred to Gitmo and held indefinitely. Also considering you have no access to a court once you're in indefinite detention who exactly is going to contest where you were actually captured? Here are some good articles explaining this in more depth: http://verdict.justi...n-act-explained http://verdict.justi...-ndaa-explained