Nikos

Ummm...

There's a Law & Public Safety senate meeting scheduled for April 22nd.

The proposal also called for background checks for private gun sales and a new registry for existing magazines that carry 10 or more bullets, something of a compromise for parents of Newtown victims who had wanted an outright ban on them, while legislators had proposed grandfathering them into the law. Looks like many states are joining the excessive, non-effective, feel good law marathon. Can't wait to see what happens to us. Blood pressure increasing link below: http://abcnews.go.co...30#.UVoJgY59-3o

The Beretta Eagle is a game changer.

Looks like the KNS perma-pin. I never had a BCG with one

Picked 2 up as well. Fits fully extended AR w/18" barrel (+brake), 3x9x40 mounted scope & bipod nicely. Worth the money.

Got the notification email from DSG. ARPartsfinder is a good tool if you're glued to your computer screen waiting for the hit to show up.

Available as of this post -- act quick http://dsgarms.com/ProductInfo/SKPSP223LOWER-FORGED.aspx

You're correct. I saw the pic above of the FSB with the bayo lug and thought it was the OP's -- Just noticed his other post that he has the pinned/welded brake.

I prefer to remove the FSB when I neuter it. One slip with the grinder and you can gouge the barrel. If you plan on removing it, support the upper on blocks and just drive out the gas tube pin and the two taper pins first. Clear the gas tube and tap the FSB loose with a soft mallet and pull it off the barrel.

I'm going to give another nod for the Troy BattleRail Alpha. It's a nice design which firmly secures to the existing barrel nut (need to remove delta ring first) and you can position the detachable rails where they're needed. I'm no longer a fan of quad rails since I now prefer the smooth profile the guard. The Samson evolution is another similarly designed guard which is also a quality unit.

Interesting thread. It started as a drama, turned into a mystery, and ended as a comedy. Glad to hear that Greg is okay after his ordeal. I think it's time to change the title so that it doesn't turn into a soap opera

Identical Bill Number: S419 Last Session Bill Number: A3544 S2431 Albano, Nelson T. as Primary Sponsor Milam, Matthew W. as Primary Sponsor 1/10/2012 Introduced, Referred to Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee Over a year has passed and his views could have changed.

Be careful what you wish for... http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2012/Bills/A4000/3772_I1.HTM

A4001 Requires firearms endorsement on driver's license or non-driver identification card. Announced: 03/21/2013. Description: None yet Mainor, Charles as Primary Sponsor Albano, Nelson T. as Primary Sponsor Jimenez, Angelica M. as Primary Sponsor Well, Mr. Charles, 20 sec mag change, Mainor wants our DLs to note that we are firearms owners. Edit: Bill updated 04/04/2013 to show details (link below) http://www.njleg.sta...500/4001_I1.PDF A4001 MAINOR, JIMENEZ 3 1 STATEMENT 2 3 This bill would require State residents who have a permit to 4 purchase a handgun or a firearms purchaser identification card to 5 obtain a firearms endorsement on his or her driver’s license. If the 6 resident does not have a driver’s license, the resident would be 7 required to obtain a firearms endorsement on a non-driver 8 identification card as issued by the New Jersey Motor Vehicle 9 Commission (MVC). 10 When the resident renews his or her driver’s license or non11 driver identification card, the bill would require the resident to 12 provide evidence as required by the Chief Administrator of the 13 MVC and the Superintendent of State Police that he or she has not 14 been disqualified to possess a firearm. 15 Under the bill, firearms retailers in this State would be prohibited 16 from selling a firearm to a resident who does not produce a valid 17 driver’s license or non-driver identification card which has a 18 firearms endorsement. 19 The bill would also require residents to exhibit their driver’s 20 license or non-driver identification card with a firearms 21 endorsement upon request of a law enforcement officer. It is 22 presumptive evidence under the bill that a resident who fails to 23 exhibit the license or identification card does not have a valid 24 firearms purchaser identification card. 25 A fine of $500 would be imposed on a resident who fails to 26 obtain the firearms endorsement required by the bill and his or her 27 permit to purchase a handgun or firearms identification card would 28 be revoked. 29 The fee for the firearms endorsement would be set by the chief 30 administrator.

kman, On the ticket w/ the registration, the (Park) is circled but on the "uninsured mv" there's no mark. Doesn't matter anyway since I have proof of coverage. I fully understand that the public street parking makes our cars fair game for tickets. My problem is that an LEO is willing to issue a summons based solely upon assumption. LEO had no proof that my car is not insured and no proof that it was being operated w/o insurance yet she issued the ticket regardless. Now the burden is on me to prove that my car has insurance which is b.s.

Never heard of that. As I stated above, there was never a lapse in insurance coverage and the vehicle has not been operated to warrant the ticket.

So, I have a car parked on the street in front of my residence which I haven't driven for about a year. The registration expired which attracted a plate scanning police cruiser. I get a ticket for the expired registration (no complaint -- my fault) but there was a second ticket (39:6b-2) for "uninsured mv" which makes it a WTF scenario. The vehicle has always been insured with no coverage lapses and it was not being operated. So, to our forum LEOs, I just have to ask... Is it common to tack on an "uninsured mv" ticket to parked car with an expired registration based on assumption? This is a pretty serious summons with severe consequences which requires a court appearance. Although I know it'll be dismissed, the premise of how the ticket was issued is "F"ed up. Hopefully I can have the judge look into this sooner and have the ticket dismissed without having to show up in court. Considering all the recent WTF events in NJ, I would like to say that I'm surprised... but I can't. 39:6b-2 2. Any owner or registrant of a motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this State who operates or causes to be operated a motor vehicle upon any public road or highway in this State without motor vehicle liability insurance coverage required by this act, and any operator who operates or causes a motor vehicle to be operated and who knows or should know from the attendant circumstances that the motor vehicle is without motor vehicle liability insurance coverage required by this act shall be subject, for the first offense, to a fine of not less than $300 nor more than $1,000 and a period of community service to be determined by the court, and shall forthwith forfeit his right to operate a motor vehicle over the highways of this State for a period of one year from the date of conviction. Upon subsequent conviction, he shall be subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and shall be subject to imprisonment for a term of 14 days and shall be ordered by the court to perform community service for a period of 30 days, which shall be of such form and on such terms as the court shall deem appropriate under the circumstances, and shall forfeit his right to operate a motor vehicle for a period of two years from the date of his conviction, and, after the expiration of said period, he may make application to the Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles for a license to operate a motor vehicle, which application may be granted at the discretion of the director. The director's discretion shall be based upon an assessment of the likelihood that the individual will operate or cause a motor vehicle to be operated in the future without the insurance coverage required by this act. A complaint for violation of this act may be made to a municipal court at any time within six months after the date of the alleged offense. Failure to produce at the time of trial an insurance identification card or an insurance policy which was in force for the time of operation for which the offense is charged creates a rebuttable presumption that the person was uninsured when charged with a violation of this section. L.1972,c.197,s.2; amended 1983, c.141, s.1; 1987, c.46; 1988, c.156, s.15; 1990, c.8, s.49; 1997, c.151, s.12.

Wow, Jean Picard is right behind the governor.

Build your own lower as it is fairly simply. It's also cheaper and will help you understand the workings of the components which will benefit you in the future to troubleshoot your weapon and also upgrade parts as needed.

Actually, it's 7 strikes if you add the 3 free mags

http://www.slickguns.com/category/ammo Recent "deals" have gone up between 20 - 30%

AR trigger that may interest you http://www.elftmanntactical.com/

1. If you hold the closed balisong by the hinged end (both handles horizontal) and flip it up in the air for a single revolution, the handles swing to the opposite side. Timed correctly, you can quickly snap the balisong open as you catch handles in less than a second. It's a neat trick but not a reliable method. 2. Even quicker and a lot more practical, you hold the balisong upside down (hinge down) with the locking latch facing away from you. Grip the latch using your thumb and index finger (hand looks like it's almost open)and allow the handle closest to you to freely swing down and as soon as it clears 180*, slightly flick your wrist to continue its momentum upward and then close your fist as you squeeze the handles together. Once you have the timing and wrist flick down, you can quickly snap the balisong open in a fraction of a second. The end result is that the blade faces down and out.

Various legit sites will automatically add the free mount in the cart when you purchase a qualifying scope.