Qel Hoth

There is no state in the union where you can not legally use deadly force. The situations in which you are legally allowed to use deadly force may be very limited (i.e. retreat as much as possible, even in the home), but EVERY state has justifiable homicide in cases where deadly force was the only reasonable reaction to the situation at hand. You may or may not be protected from civil lawsuits, but if a bad guy herds you into your closet (which happens to have your gun in it), and he is threatening you with deadly force, it is highly unlikely you will even be charged, and you won't be convicted.

Assuming you are right... what is a valid reason for carrying a firearm then? Valid reasons for carrying a knife other than SD: 1. Opening stuff 2. Cutting stuff 3. Glass break (for knives that have one) 4. Peeling fruit Valid reasons for carrying a firearm other than SD: 1. .... Anyone help me out here?

I was about to post this also, but then I saw this, and wasn't sure anymore. With (b) being the exception paragraph.

I asked you to provide a citation of law when you said this: "Also, loaded firearm in a vehicle = CCW" The law you just cited has nothing to do with what I asked you about, what you said. It has nothing to do with a loaded firearm, and it has nothing to do with CCW. Which of those seven words you said does your citation of law support? I should clarify. You need a LTCF or accepted permit to carry a firearm in a vehicle, unless the firearm is unloaded AND securely wrapped. However, if you are going to/from target practice in which case the firearm must be unloaded. "loaded firearm in vehicle = CCW" was supposed to imply that you cannot claim you are open carrying (which is legal without a license), in a vehicle.

Yes, hence the "same compartment" qualifier in my post. When in a vehicle it does not specify if the firearm is concealed or open. See above. Carrying is legal in a vehicle IF you have a LTCF or accepted out of state permit. Otherwise it is not.

Camden/Gloucester counties seem to be pretty slim for ranges, except for skeet/trap shotgun clubs, they are everywhere.

We're talking about pistols here, what relevance does a FID have?

Keep in mind that in PA, loaded magazines in the same compartment as the firearm designed to accept them constitutes a loaded firearm. Also, loaded firearm in a vehilce = CCW, there is no OC in a vehicle in PA. So long as you aren't in Philadelphia County you can OC without a permit in PA.

Even if Obama or Romney sign it, it will not likely be ratified by Congress.

We need a way for the people to charge officials with a crime... How many Cheifs and/or mayors do you think we could hit with this if there was a way?

Wouldn't be a problem? Guess we can throw away that whole Title 2C, Title 54, Title 39. I mean, breaking them isn't a problem is it?

How about the town starts following state law? Its not that damn hard.

From the link... Appellate court orders his property be returned. Stolen gun he obviously won't get back, hopefully that one found it's way back to it's rightful owner. He should be getting the HPs back though.

The hold harmless probably wouldn't hold up. He surrendered the money under duress (do it or get a felony charge), and he signed the hold harmless under duress (sign it or don't get your money back).

Completely different situations. A child fighting and screaming to be let go is RS in and of itself a crime may be taking place. Carrying a "large" amount of cash on your person is not RS in and of itself. Also, refusal to answer questions one is not obligated to answer, as well as refusal to give consent to search, do not constitute PC. You would agree that the consequences of letting the guy with "too much" cash go and the guy with the fighting child are quite different, would you not?

So Dicks has 10/22s for 200, savage gxp for 160 and remington 795 for 130, which one and why for a .22 plinker.

Beat me to it, I was still trying to find the court's opinion because it has been removed from the NJ DoJ site but apparently not added to the Rutgers site yet... "Usual" expansion is probably going to be interpreted as how much a FMJ would expand under similar circumstances. Anything specifically designed to expand, yet not a hollowpoint (EFMJ, Pow'r Ball, Critical Defense/Duty...) still falls under the statute then.

Dude, its NJ... Give me 30 mins and ill quote stuff.

Will quote when I get home, but the judges ruled that the meaning of "dum-dum" is plain, and Webster's defines a "dum-dum" bullet as anything meant to.expand. dum-dum and HP are.both restricted under 2C-39-3f

I would imagine "showing good cause" just to BUY a handgun would get thrown out pretty damn quick in federal court...

I might be up for r14 this afternoon if someone is willing to guest me in.

+40° 0' 4.14", -74° 32' 44 maps.google.com, right click, directions to here.

The courts have said LE can't use telephoto lenses and such to take pictures of you inside your home without getting on your property. I would imagine the same rule would be applied to using aircraft to photograph areas that cannot be seen from the ground (fenced in yards and such.

Given the Aitken ruling, EFMJ, soft point, and any other bullet designed to expand also falls under the restriction of 2C:39-3 f (1)...

Booting into safe mode won't protect him if the files are infected. It's not guaranteed to protect him even if they aren't infected. Before any files are loaded on the PC after the reformat, autorun should be disabled and the flash drive scanned with an up to date AV. This of course assumes the machine is infected, which it is not necessarily.