Screwball

Same here... any bolt related to optics gets done. Didn't do the knob on the Aimpoint mount, since it has a tension feature built in. I believe the screws on the mount/riser have Loctite on them, from the factory. Recoil will loosen screws. Don't care how tight you go. Loctite and torque wrench should be in everyone's toolbox.

With belt ammo, there is one issue to watch out for... having over 15 rounds linked together. There are a few semi-auto belt fed rifles in NJ. As long as it isn't 16 or more rounds linked together, it is good. Also, .50 BMG is not primarily used in a handgun, so no chance of anything coming up on that end... even though it will sit on the wall. Legal, as long as the seller is willing to send it in.

Seeing the other thread, I do say that pumps are more reliable than semi-autos. At a certain point, my 11-87s stops ejecting lighter 12 Gauge loads. There is such a wide spread of shotgun ammo performance that it is very hard to get a semi-auto to function with everything. In regards to seeing more failures with pumps, your argument kind of stops when you mention short stroking. Sorry, but that is a user induced failure... due to lack of training. A properly operated pump shotgun does not fail with light loads, due to an external force on the action (judging you have the strength to run it). Look at the 1986 FBI Miami shootout... SA Mireles ran an 870 one handed, and put rounds towards the target (only hit the one suspect in the feet with the first round, but everything else went into the vehicle they were trying to escape in). He stopped using it when it ran out of ammo. Reliability wise, most traditional designs (pump and semi-auto) feed from tube magazines... which are for the most part, pretty reliable for shotgun ammo (you have issues with pointed rifle ammo in those magazines). So, an operation done by hand will usually be more reliable than one using the power of a shotgun shell to accomplish a similar task (gas, recoil, etc). Any defensive firearm should be trained on. If you short stroke a pump in training, either train some more or revaluate your firearm choice. But that, in itself, doesn't make a semi-auto more reliable... it makes a semi-auto easier to run. If you are going with a semi-auto, get yourself confident that the shells you will use for defense will function.

While that isn't good that the rifle will fire on lifting the handle, if it fails with the trigger pull... Ruger definitely is a good company for recalls.

Calibers is probably the worst part of shooting... just confusing until you learn it. .38/.357, .45 and .454 working in a .460, and not to mention .223/5.56mm and .308/7.62x51mm. I'm glad you don't see .380 labeled as 9mm Short anymore... being 9mm anything is thought to go in a 9x19 chamber. I still have my Type I Carcano, which shoots 6.5mm Japanese, but also the Oswald replica, which shoots 6.5mm Carcano. The Italian round loads with enbloc clips, and has a longer case (with RN bullet), but I really don't like having both together due to that close of a similarity. I know which goes where, but if I'm shooting with someone, I don't want the wrong round being jammed in the wrong rifle.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/08/08/p320-failed-without-even-dropping-no-plans-test/ This was nice... I do hope that this is fixed in the military pistols, as even though it is an unlikely chance of it occurring, if tax payer money is going to SIG... I want our military to have the best pistol possible.

Very few hammer fired handguns don't utilize a firing pin block... so for most modern hammer fired guns, that is not accurate.

Think I have three of the MS4 slings... very happy with them.

Sorry, but have you seen any other of MAC's videos? Him throwing guns and magazines around are not uncommon... unless it is something historic (surplus or rare firearms). He owns a gun shop, and has plenty of firearms at his disposal. Who cares if he tosses a gun around? If it breaks, you see a limit that has been broken. It's not like it is your gun... But why act like it is ok? Wasn't ok in Miami back in 1986, when an agent was shot in his hand, and the blood/meat rendered his revolver inoperable after he emptied it into the suspects' vehicle. People have had malfunctions in almost all firearms. One can only hope that it just occurs at the range. Another example would be Trooper Gonzalez in the 1990s... who was killed when his P7M8 jammed while taking fire from a suspect with a shotgun. Just because it isn't mud doesn't mean the video didn't show what could happen. Understood, but if money or some other benefit was the factor behind the review, wouldn't it be either a total negative or positive review? Why say it is crap because it doesn't work, yet carry the gun for a year and clearly compliment the pistol in videos?

You are going out of state to go shooting or get your gun appraised at a dealer... from home. You are coming back in the state from shooting or getting your gun appraised at a dealer... heading home. Once you cross the Delaware River, go straight home. If you are leaving home, don't stop for X, Y, or Z within NJ (unless allowed). NJSP and other state/local law enforcement agencies cannot enforce the law outside of NJ. Just be sure to follow it when here.

That kind of really Spark Notes the entire thing down to the point where it isn't the true story. Tim carried his gun for a year (had two, as well as a Tactical model; he backup was the beaten gun, his carry gun was the one in the new round of torture tests), and even when the video aired that he was throwing the gun, he stated (and did up through the current torture tests) that it wasn't normal use... like him carrying it AIWB. The fault of the magazine paddle breaking... he stated his opinion that he preferred traditional releases, as they don't fail in the same manner. I feel the same, as if all my guns push in to drop the magazine, why get one that pushes down (I've been practicing on a LEM USP40 Compact, which that is something that had to be considered)? The one that caused the VP9 to choke by putting it in muddy/sediment filled water, I'd say that was probably one of the best tests ever done? Might upset you, but let's say you fall into mud with the gun in your hand? Instinctively, you are putting your hands down to slow your fall, which will put weight behind the gun. Not far fetched... and sediment made the gun unreliable for the rest of that video. It is a piece of data... which people look at to see whether they should buy/not buy a pistol. Still, he changed from the VP9 to the CZ P-01 (I have the larger SP-01, and love it). He is allowed to do that... just as you are allowed to not consider his results for your opinion. However, for someone to not condone or support carrying a specific gun, Tim does happen to praise it in mostly anytime it comes up on camera. When he did the new standardized torture test, he stated as much (loves how the gun shoots) when he put the first 10 rounds prior to the test. If he was so against it, why put something like that in his video?

Kind of the pot calling the kettle black... The implying that Glock was behind it, without evidence (my post really just asked what you knew about it, and what would have to be uncovered to prove it), is just the same as saying the P320 fires when dropped, without evidence. Personally, I've seen SIG's response, which I'm sure isn't anything more than damage control. What I want to see is Dallas PD's response on how this turned into a circus. That would be more telling, as SIG responses aren't always considering reality (how about their response that they were working with NJSP to fix their P229s, almost a year after they switched to Glock?) In regards to SIG hating, I don't feel uncomfortable with my P228 or my P938. There were crappy guns coming out of NH, and still occurs from time to time (NJSP guns, for example), but any manufacturer can have issues. I'd want the gun to be good to go from purchase, but if it goes back and is fixed, I'm ok with that if they take care of the costs. If I have to pay to get it fixed, or if it comes back still broken, then I have a problem with that. Price, that is something I can say without hesitation. SIG P226s were in the running with the Beretta 92FS for the M9 trial... and viewed to be a similar pistol (both past the trials, with SIG being cheaper per pistol, and Beretta being cheaper per package). Yet, a SIG P226 is $200+ more than a Beretta 92FS... in a comparable gun. That's why SIG won't get me to buy another classic line pistol. My P228 (German made) is sort of collectible, as it is a desirable gun... and I got a great deal from a moderator on BerettaForum. And for the record, I am still considering a P320... for when I'm out of NJ. By then, any issues would likely have arisen, so I'd feel confident in that decision. In regards to a chassis pistol design, SIG has the market cornered.

Proof of that? I only say that because it emanated with a new poster on SIG Talk saying he was affiliated with Dallas PD, and this ban occurred. There would have to be some affiliation between Glock and this person. Difference between this and the stuff going on in politics is the frequency there. If it occurred multiple times, and there were links to Glock, then you would have a case.

I doubt it will be a Naked Gun... but some funny points do help broaden the audience. The one thing I didn't like about the original Death Wish was the lack of emotion. If you can, go and watch the original trailer on YouTube. You find out your wife and daughter were attacked in a home invasion... and you greet the doctor at the hospital with a smile on your face? But that was 1970s acting. I do like what I'm seeing in the new trailer. Trailers aren't the whole movie, just things to draw you in. If you look at the original, there was a lot of action scenes... but when your character has a six shot .32 revolver, it isn't going to be Last Man Standing. I like that they kept the name (can see it on his coat when he talks to the kid), and even that finger shoot scene. Also glad they went from New York to Chicago... as it does point out the amount of crap going on out there. As long as the Glock magazines aren't endless, and that AR empties somewhat normally, I want to see the storyline. It looks similar, but MGM... PLEASE DON'T DO SEQUELS!

Third handgun? Third Generation S&W... CopperCustom had CHP .40s... all stainless, with integrated rail, and decock only. Think they are in the $300 range. Plus, they are sending $15 of that to fight gun rights in CA, as civilians couldn't buy those pistols, as they are not on the list.

I'm on Tapatalk, so can't see your profile, but what district, if you don't mind me asking? I was big on staying in NJ, but economically... it wasn't in the cards. Was in the application process for NJSP, but something medically came up and I withdrew. While I respect all the members of the NJSP, it was probably the best thing to happen to me. The pay increases told just aren't occurring. While I could make it work, taxes in Howell just keep going up. Was going to apply again when another process opened up, as I had the medical stuff squared away, but talked to a few guys in there... and none of them recommended it in my position. Put in for a few CBP positions, got a 97 on the one in ME, and has been going extremely well thus far. Another option for us was the Carolinas, as her family is all down that way. I really don't know income levels outside of L/E, but housing is SO MUCH cheaper. Taxes, as well. And this includes both ME and NC... as I really wasn't too fond of SC (unrelated reasons). We were looking at housing in ME... specifically Houlton, and $290,000 gets you a somewhat modern 4 bedroom home, on 125 acres. Taxes are under $3,000. We are paying over that (in taxes) on a 0.25 acre lot in Howell, with a Cape Cod. The position pays about what entry level L/E in NJ starts at, and I have a general idea of pay increases. Am I definitely going to stay there? Maybe... but in regards to finances, it is a good place to be. For my one hobby... firearms... I can have a lot more fun there than NJ. Already have an idea on longer ranges (600 yards), and if I did a 125 acre property, could setup my own range. No pistol permits, no one handgun a month, a C&R license that can be utilized correctly, and an AR that can have a collapsible stock and bayonet lug. Trust me, living in NJ all my life, I wouldn't want to be taken out of school at 9. But if it gets worse (sorry to say, I think it will... and not just 2A stuff), and you decide to move at 14-16, that sucks even more. My parents are here for my grandfather (mothers side), but likely moving to NC once they can (she needs to do a few more years before retiring; he did already, but still working). I'd really evaluate why you want to stay, and consider moving if you really want to. Considering doesn't mean putting stuff up for sale and giving notice, but have a serious conversation regarding it and see if it something that you might want to move forward with. While it has no real barring on the subject on which gun to get, why buy something NJ compliant if you can get one that isn't? I've put all my gun expenses on stuff I'd do if I was out of state, anyways.

I'd personally can't make the right suggestion, going off of what you wrote. I have 4 ARs, not to mention multiple shotguns, pistol carbines, traditional rifles, pistols, revolvers, etc. With 51 firearms, I'd say get your collection moving... Having to buy one, on the spot... an AR. That market is so saturated that you can get awesome deals. With the election coming up, I'd consider getting happy with your scary guns sooner rather than later. Don't know what Trenton will do with a Democrat governor... but I'd say pump shotguns should still be safe (unless they go after the KSG style). If something occurs in NJ where you can't get new rifles, upper and magazine adapter... and you now have a new rifle. Can go from 5.56mm to 9mm or .45... or even something like .50 Beowulf or .458 SOCOM. Really comes down to how fast you want to spend money, if you are staying in NJ, and how far down the road you want to look.

Also, push mount forward when locking it down, to try and get the zero close (do it every time, to reduce differences that the mount is facing when reattached). It will wander (don't care what the manufacturer says, way to keep the zero is not to pull the optic off)... but the only reason I'd pull an Aimpoint off my gun would be if the lens cracked. Battery dies, irons are visible right through the optic. The knob on the Aimpoint mount is a little large, but I don't have an issue. I have a LaRue mount on my magnifier, which is nicer for removing/installing... but was because I hated the twist mount (and I can use the LaRue mounted magnifier on all three rifles, since they are all the same height).

The CZ is nice and I'm going to get one, but going to be a purchase after I move, as I want to SBR and suppress. It is along the lines of a MP5 clone... 16" is legal, but makes the gun unwieldy. They were designed as short barreled. I do get the size thing with the KelTec, but having such a compact carbine had me adapt to it. Someone does make a red-dot mount that swivels out of the way, allowing it to still fold... just need to bungee the bolt handle from hitting the lens when folded. I leave mine with irons, just press my face into the bolt tube. In regards to the CX4... very good carbine. Only thing, never pull the upper off the lower with the hammer down (fired). Can rip off the buffer and or guide rod... disabling the gun. SierraPapa does an aftermarket assembly, which I definitely recommend. Their trigger is nice (have one), but not necessary for the function of the rifle. Shoot it, and if the trigger bothers you, swap it out. I actually prefer the CX4 over the KelTec (like controls and last shot bolt hold). I tossed the AR out because it sounded like you liked the AR, just not the caliber. I'm not going to lie, Macon's uppers are a little pricey (think mine with the adapter was $950). But toss it on a lower with a carbine buffer, and you should be good to go. If you talk to Rudy at Macon, he will do his best to accommodate your needs. I talked to him about mine, as I needed to have the barrel compliant to NJ law. He did one with a target crown. Blowback is another option, but a little more finicky than D/I (need to get the buffer weight correct). But shy of the two pins to attach the upper, only building I did was the lower. Not that difficult.

You can get a pistol caliber AR... Macon Armory did that for me... .45 D/I upper. That is an older magazine adapter, which uses H&K USC magazines. Macon did a new magazine/adapter, which still fits a standard AR lower. They have 10 and 20 rounders, which are steel. I did ask Rudy (owner) about 15 rounders, but not following up with him since I'm moving out of state... have the adapter already, will order 20s when I move. Going that route, or a 9mm with magazine adapter allows you to convert the rifle over to 5.56mm or anything else that doesn't use a proprietary magazine well. If you want any info on CX4s or SUB-2000 Gen 2s, I do have one of each. I love pistol caliber carbines, just for the fun factor. Nevertheless, they can hold their own for home defense.

50 yard zero gives you POI within 2.5" of the dot from 0 to about 250 yards. There are benefits of other zeros, so something that you need to research and see what works best for your needs. Aimpoints come with a battery. Think most common brands supply a battery (SIG does, for example). In regards to the second part, that is nice and all... but you should never just take one source of info. I say YouTube, because you can search and get 15 different reviews on it. Usually the more trusted ones are higher rated. While some are paid, you do get a couple that are honest. And definitely look into comments. Just one source of information... Forums are another... and not just this one. There are wealths of info on forums like AR15.com, M4Carbine.net, and a few others. While I do trust people on NJGF, I also trust people out of state. Do you get some people that talk out of their rear ends? Yea, but have to wade through the BS and find the truth... usually not hard when you research multiple sources.

Do it a few times with the cover on the objective... it's pretty cool how your eyes transpose the dot onto the target.

Aimpoint PROs are good to go... plenty of reviews out there on them. I have two, myself. One on an AR, other on a Tavor.

I did have to use them for a defective DS00 tail cap on my Scout light... button worked, but would not activate when the pressure switch was depressed. They sent a new one, but after the first call, it took like 2-3 days for a shipping label (guy said it would be there in a few hours; didn't call because I was busy, but showed up). Then it took like 3 weeks before I got the replacement. Figured there would be at least a "received" email or a tracking number sent when it shipped. When it showed up, all I was thinking was that I hope the pressure switch wasn't bad... But never had an issue with a Surefire product other than that.

If an NJ holster company makes a holster that fits your combo, I'd go that route... But there are plenty of holster companies out there, and with the VP9 being somewhat popular, as is that model of Surefire, I'm sure you'll find someone doing it if not available at a local company. I had Bravo Concealment do one for my SP-01 and TRL-1 HL. Very happy with it. If you are looking for IWB, I just ordered a hybrid holster from White Hat Holsters for my J-frame (with LaserMax light). I've heard good things about them, but I'm like a week and a half out from getting it. With the amount of forums out there (H&K forums, generic firearms forums, carry forums), you definitely can get a wide spectrum of reviews regarding most holster companies. Always use that to your advantage, as the good ones are recommended for a reason. I did make a thread about a guy that goes to the Oaks gun show (coming up next week; 8/5 and 8/6), who does custom holsters... but seems that thread was deleted. Was SharkTac, if you were looking to have something made for you while you browse the show. Good guy that has been making holsters for over a decade. Was actually going to bring my J-frame to him... until I found White Hat. In regards to the weapon light, I'm a big Surefire guy. I love my P2X and P3X lights, and have the X300U. Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't have picked up the X300U. I have a few Steamlights, and even some old Insight LED lights... and with the toggle, constant is one direction, momentary is the other. I really don't like the push in for momentary on the Surefire. Not saying it is a bad light, because it is not, but feel more comfortable with Streamlight type controls. Plus, it is 800 lumens verses 600... while both are bright enough, the Streamlight makes the lit area a little clearer than the Surefire. I got the Surefire off AR15.com, pretty much new in box (was opened, but seller had good feedback and the light did not look different than his post implied) for about $60 less than what I could get one for (shipped, comparing to prices online... without shipping). It is an extra light, and even though I don't use it regularly, I'll keep it for a backup. I do have a M600IB Scout light on my Tavor, which I do like. That sensor on the head is pretty neat; if you shine it far away, then toss your hand in front of the beam, it adjusts pretty quickly. But that is a little more than a pistol light. Edit: Reading the end of the thread, if the setup is strictly for home defense, have you considered a chest mounted rig on a plate carrier? Toss on carrier, pull gun out of safe, and you don't have to mess with a belt. Depend on the carrier, leave one half undone and slide it on quickly.