H.M. Murdock

Thing is they are the official NRA "chapter" for NJ. That complicates things for me. I will continue to support them (non-range only) as well as supporting NJ2AS, GOA, SAF and of course the NRA. To me it seems like they are working behind the scenes with lobbyists and elected officials. I understand that they can't release details about that -- you won't get very far lobbying if you publicize the process and expose the actors involved. But we should have an idea of what's on the table. For instance, I would be horrified to say the least if they were compromising in favor of reduced magazine capacity in exchange for the other bills to be withdrawn. NOT ONE INCH.

I'm going off a month old memory of that video where they unloaded a shotgun in the trunk of his car at night...but it seemed they were emptying a pump shotgun via the "depress the slide release and rack the shit out of it until rounds stop falling out" method. I'll take another look I guess P.S. a Glock 10mm? a Saiga-12? These firearms are not common -- more like cult classics -- firearms from the quiver of a true shooting enthusiast. Still interested on the full report.. i.e. how were her firearms stored?

http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/46111-vermont-awb-bill-withdrawn/

Start here http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/31766-cherry-ridge/page__st__330 or just read the whole thread, it's still early in the day

Yeah, something funny going on there, they are distancing themselves conspicuously

Landlord taken to hospital with minor face injuries

Damn! Too far for my sore legs but thanks for sharing

Those guys usually learn things the hard way

WHERE?? WHERE?? LINK! MORE INFO!

There is an interesting discussion on THR forum about this aspect of the new law: http://www.thehighro...ad.php?t=696124 "1) They require dealers to perform a NICS check before they sell ammo. But it is illegal under federal law to access NICS for anything other than a Handgun or Long Gun purchase. So the law requires that ammo dealers violate federal law." -- burk "Accessing or using the NICS, or permitting access or use of NICS by another, for any unauthorized purpose is a violation of Federal law, sanctions for which included criminal prosecution; a civil fine not to exceed $10,000 and/or cancellation of NICS inquiry privileges. If New York State is directing it's residents and businesses by law, to violate a Federal statute......" -- Old Fuff "§ 25.6 Accessing records in the system. (a) FFLs may initiate a NICS background check only in connection with a proposed firearm transfer as required by the Brady Act. FFLs are strictly prohibited from initiating a NICS background check for any other purpose. (p. 58308)" -- Solo

Crap.. Thanks Vlad Why did Sprint have to buy Nextel, damn it.

^^ McLaughlin for President!! How does he vote on other issues? F it, I don't care!

From a mass email sent by ANJRPC: Dedicated to responsible firearms ownership and use since 1934 LEGISLATIVE WARNING FROM EVAN NAPPEN: SOME NJ GUN BILLS COULD CANCEL ALL NJ FID CARDS, MANDATE POLICE TURN-IN OR FACE FELONY By Evan F. Nappen, Attorney at Law (Exclusive to ANJRPC) Out of the 23 bills recently filed in New Jersey, three dealing with mental health evaluations as a condition of issuance of FID cards contain potential severe unintended consequences that could invalidate every FID card in the state. They are A3688 (sponsors: Mainor and Jimenez), A3667 (sponsors: Cryan, O'Donnell, and Jasey) and A3676 (sponsor: Jimenez.) All three of these bills require a mental health evaluation approved by the Superintendent of State police as a condition for issuance of a New Jersey Firearms Purchaser ID card under N.J.S. 2C:58-3c. Failure to do so is explicitly a "disability” under N.J.S. 2C:58-3c A3676 also requires a privacy invading in-home inspection as a condition for issuance of an FID card, and A3688 requires submission of a list of household members with mental illness to the police to receive an FID card. Failure to obey these requirements are also explicitly "disabilities” under N.J.S. 2C:58-3c. New Jersey law provides that an FID card is void if the holder becomes subject to a "disability.” Accordingly, if these bills take effect, ALL persons already holding an FID card who have not had the home inspection, psychological evaluation, or provided the list of household members (and thereby overcome the "disabilities” imposed by the legislation) MUST TURN IN their Firearms ID card to the Police. The turn in must be done within 5 days by law or face prosecution for 4th Degree Crime (Felony -18 months prison time.) TAKE OUT YOUR OWN FID AND READ THE WARNING ON THE BACK. These three bills have the potential to void every FID card in the state, and require their immediate return! See for yourself. The law under NJS 58-3f. states: "A firearms purchaser identification card shall be valid until such time as the holder becomes subject to any of the disabilities set forth in subsection c. of this section, whereupon the card shall be void and shall be returned within five days by the holder to the superintendent, who shall then advise the licensing authority. Failure of the holder to return the firearms purchaser identification card to the superintendent within the said five days shall be an offense under subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:39-10.” ____________________________________ ANJRPC will continue to monitor this legislation (along with the dozens of others being monitored) and will alert you and request action on your part at key points in the legislative process.

A trivial point, email newer than 180 days could be accessed without your knowledge with a sneak and peek warrant or a "D" order with delayed notice. But you should get notice if they're using a subpoena to access emails older than 180 days(?)

I believe that an unassembled pre-ban lower built into a rifle during the 1994 federal AWB could not have the pre-ban features. It would only be considered pre-ban if the rifle was built before that ban. But practically speaking it would be difficult for a prosecutor to prove that a pre-ban receiver was built post-ban with pre-ban features -- assuming you're not installing parts which contradict the unidirectional nature of time. Regardless, prior to the federal AWB we already had a 1991 state AWB in effect. The pre-ban concept does not exist in our state law. Any firearms that were to become banned had to be registered by the owner within a very small window of time and the firearm died with the owner. It is a safe bet that a newer state AWB bill written to expand on the existing state AWB would make your unassembled AR lowers useless in this state. The good news? I will buy them from you right now for cents on the dollar! These hypothetical questions reek of defeatism which is contagious and only serves to lower morale. We have a big fight ahead of us, who the F cares about AR lowers?!

http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/45450-ny-7-round-mags-bill-2230-merged-threads/

When are they going to drag Funtown out of the deep?

So you're the one buying up all the AR lowers. We'll need to see the law first to answer those questions, do you have a copy of it?

Thanks Smoe

I just read this in a mass email from a Mr. Gabe Suarez: "I spoke with several ammo makers and they are committed to taking over the 7.62x39 market in ammo. This could be the best thing that happens to this caliber by the way." That sounds good

Now it's imminent

The one and only bump

Another Fudd going full-Cheney News has picked up on 5 injuries at 3 shows this weekend (so far)

Blue, this is a different conversation IMO. This is about solidarity amongst gun owners in standing for our rights. We could be talking about exemptions for private security or rape victims for all I care. Assigning people to various tiers of 2nd amendment restrictions is anti-2A. Once the primary users of the frequency band, to use a FCC term, get their exemptions then us secondary users get ignored. We've got no juice!

Yup I agree.. But you took it too far.. "Bucket 3 - General Discussion: NO debates about politics or religion." Post reported!