illy

If it was my permit/$, I'd go with: http://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/ruger-sr1911-cmd-45-acp-pistol-review/

Email from Cabelas this morning: Backorder-Tentative arrival to Cabelas 04/30/13 Mother®!&_>£

Just called. They told me March 25. We'll see...

http://www.cabelas.c...285&WT.tsrc=AFF

Well, I've been told that some shops in PA have, since the madness in NY, put up signs which read "No sales of guns/ammo to NY residents". No reason why they wouuldn't do the same to us.

http://www.underwoodammo.com/9mmlugerp124grainXTPjackethollowpointboxof50.aspx

$20 for 50

Nice

FWIW, slug/smoothbore combos are a great suggestion. In NJ in order to use slugs for deer the shotgun has to have adjustable sights (or a scope).

lol. That said: MYOB, seriously. Either he has a right* to carry or made a mistake, not my place to call the fuzz on a fake crime. I wouldn't approach with a heads up either. A-There's always a chance that he is up to something shady somewhere down the road and now you're all in it. B- If he is OTJ, might take issue with you 'warning' a potential outlaw. EDIT: *A NJ recognized, legal right to carry upon the lands of the People's Republic.

Ruger P95, stainless I'm a wheel gunner at heart. This is my first semi-auto. Pics forthcoming (as soon as it ships, gets to my ffl, I go do the NICS paperwork, go home wait for the call that NICS went through, etc)

Thanks for all the responses. I bought the 15 round 9mm I was looking at.

I have permit to use and have only been looking at that don't exceed 10 round capacity. But that are only so many choices. So, what do you guys think about the likelihood of that magazine limit passing/not getting vetoed? I really would prefer a standard capacity gun, but don't want to find myself with a couple of "illegal/evil" mags down the line.

Edison PD 09/19/2012: Change of Address and P2P submitted. 01/09/2013: Call from PD stating application has been ready for a while but they are waiting on former PD to forward paperwork. 02/12/2013: New FPID and P2P are ready. 02/14/2013: Nothing I want is in stock.

Re: gas stations & CCs. We get our gas at Costco, which is not only the cheapest around here (Edison), but also takes no cash (only CC and debit).

That was September 19th. Got a call on Tuesday, 1/7/13 (transcribed by Google Voice): Al, what's going on. It's (name of officer) at Edison Police. Just of the keep you up to speed on your permit/ID. I keep staring at your app front of me. I mean we're done. We're pretty much good to go but it's just matter of complying with what the law states, and your initial was out of Hackensack. (Name of secretary) faxed over a couple of requests. It looks like it's at least 3 times, but we're still waiting. So just let to you know, like I said I just wanna keep you in the loop that we didn't forget about you. We're just for waiting for Hackensack to send us your original file because that's where you came from, so we can finish your package so. Again, I'm just keep you up to date. If you've got any questions, just gimme a shout (phone # repeated twice) alright, I'll talk to you later. I have to give kudos to Edison PD on this. I never called to follow-up since I'm not in the market for anything at present. I just figured it would take however long it takes and that's that. So this update was unprompted by anything but the officer trying to do his job. Thanks EPD. Now to start calling Hackensack...

My wife's a teacher and she says that's also their emergency plan in an active shooter scenario: hide.... i told her that's the dumbest bullsh!t i've ever heard. She now knows to flee if possible, fight if necessary and hide only as a last resort.

These idiots just won't stop: The people who fight and lobby and legislate to make guns regularly available are complicit in the murder of those children. They have made a clear moral choice: that the comfort and emotional reassurance they take from the possession of guns, placed in the balance even against the routine murder of innocent children, is of supreme value. Whatever satisfaction gun owners take from their guns—we know for certain that there is no prudential value in them—is more important than children’s lives. Give them credit: life is making moral choices, and that’s a moral choice, clearly made. All of that is a truth, plain and simple, and recognized throughout the world. At some point, this truth may become so bloody obvious that we will know it, too. Meanwhile, congratulate yourself on living in the child-gun-massacre capital of the known universe. Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/12/newtown-and-the-madness-of-guns.html#ixzz2F6pgqawP

I didn't see this elsewhere on the board: A bodega employee who shot a city man robbing his store used a legally registered and permitted gun, according to police. But the incident is under review as to whether the shooting represented a clear-cut case of self defense or an excessive, possibly criminal, reaction. The employee of El Jaya Deli & Grocery, who police have not identified, shot and critically wounded Jermaine Eason, 23, on Tuesday night, according to police. Eason, charged with the bodega robbery and suspected in 11 armed robberies of bodegas, grocery stores and delis over the past week, remained in critical but stable condition at St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center on Friday, police said. Lt. Richard Reyes said the employee had all of the proper paperwork for his gun. Police have not decided whether to charge him and will be consulting the Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office, he said. Investigations into the shooting and string of deli robberies are ongoing, Reyes said. El Jaya’s owner told The Record that two men wearing masks and black clothing hurled threats and waved handguns while robbing the bodega on Eighth Avenue and 22nd Street. After the robbers made off with $6,500 and several cartons of cigarettes, the employee grabbed a gun he hid behind the cash register and, on the sidewalk outside the store, shot one of the robbers, the owner said. New Jersey law says a person can use force to defend himself only if it is “immediately necessary” to protect from an assailant’s use of unlawful force. Clifton defense attorney Jef Henninger, who has litigated dozens of self defense cases, said if attempted murder or other charges are brought against the bodega employee, he would have a difficult time proving he was in imminent danger when he fired because the robbers were already out the door, no longer presenting any threat. It would be much easier to argue if he fired during the robbery when guns were drawn. “I’m not sure in any state there’s ‘Stand your ground and then go defend the pride of your ground outside,’ ” Henninger said. “It’s kind of a step to leave that threshold — that door is really the crux of the case.” continued: http://www.northjersey.com/paterson/Paterson_bodega_employee_who_shot_man_accused_in_robbery_had_legal_gun.html

I don't think there is a minimum amount of time that you need to have known someone to be the reference. Also, that's one of the questions that they ask you in the standard reference letter: How long have you known this person?

That's probably true in most circumstances. However, my only experience with it is when I worked retail security many years ago. Back then we were always asked to sign the complaint, since we were the ones who not only witnessed a crime but also made the initial detention.

I should add that your participation in the matter does not end once police arrived. You will likely be asked to respond to the police station where you will be the person signing the complaint ( as opposed to the officer). You will also probably have to testify at every stage of the legal proceeding- grand jury, evidentiary hearings, and trial. In other words it's a big responsibility to take on as you're assuming the role of the police, but without any of the training, support or legal protections that they have.

*IANAL The process is essentially the same as what security guards at a department store do. Basically if you are confident that you've witnessed a felony, I wouldn't try it was a misdemeanor, you contact police if there's time available to do that first and then you make note of where the suspect is, follow them and only detain them if it's likely that they are about to leave the scene before police arrive. You then tell the person, if you're going to detain them, that you witnessed them committing the crime, police are on their way and they need to remain where they are. Using physical force to restrain the suspect is dangerous and could open the citizen up to all types of legal, civil and criminal, liability. Transporting the person you've detained is even more risky from a legal perspective. In all cases police should be notified as soon as possible that you are detaining this person. It should also be noted, that merchants i.e. storeowners etc., have greater leeway in detaining people on their property. I believe there's a set of laws called the merchant statues which offer extended legal protection in those circumstances.

2

Can they really be that motherf^€£ing dumb? Nearly all those deaths are innocent civilians and militia men fighting a tyrannical government. THAT'S who this treaty would disarm, not the tyrants. Buncha effin scumbag idiots!