springfieldxds

is open carry of an unloaded long gun legal in a vehicle with an fid?

i have high hopes for Peruta, if Clement is the one to argue the case im pretty sure well have a very favorable ruling, also on another note we should know any day now if they'll let the AG intervene, they're not on the clock but 2 weeks is the usual

he can appeal to scotus i believe, but without an opinion from NJSC its extremely unlikely they'll accept it

why was rabner reappointed by Christie, this confuses me, back deal possibly?

yeah i received that email, i just dont really understand how this would come into play "New Jersey's high court in Pantano could have made it more difficult for the U.S. Supreme Court in Drake to overturn New Jersey's carry law." state court and federal courts are two different things, how would a state court decision interfere with a federal courts decision, unless they contradicted themselves

how would it have interfered with Drake?

i have to agree with you, all im wondering though is, how do the other 40 plus states deal with their terrorism problem, i mean a state like PA that only requires a background check to purchase a gun, even in Philadelphia!!!!!!!!! well they must have a bunch of gun wielding terrorist running around, now that i know this im going to call JC and thank them for breaking the law and keeping me safe from all the dangerous PA terrorist that come to NJ and fill out all the paper work and get finger printed to buy their assault rifles and large capacity magazines here in NJ, oh wait that cant be right well none the less youre right, lets just let all the inner cities require any forms they want, we all know terrorist are buying their mass destructive firearms in NJ after waiting months for their FID and P2P and going through the background check and waiting 31 days to purchase a new pistol and only buying magazines that hold 15 rds, good old JC, protecting the citizens of NJ by breaking the law we really are screwed in NJ if this is what the 2A community believes

to add a little to the conversation, there was really no hope the NJSC would've struck down justifiable need, the only hope was that the NJSC decision was so flawed that scotus was compelled to hear the case with the NJSC dodging the case though, there is no chance scotus will hear it i dont believe there was ever a chance scotus would hear the case under any circumstances, i do have a little hope though that scotus is waiting for Clement to come before them an argue the case

The court issued an Order stating “This matter having been duly considered, and the Court having determined that Certification was improvidently granted; it is Ordered that the within appeal is dismissed.” is this to say that pantano was granted a license and thats why the case was dismissed?

i guess im different, i dont mind not having to pump my own gas, but if i did own a bike, well that i would want to pump myself

this only works if youre flying out of PA, what if youre flying out of newark?

Revell sued, and lost; the Third Circuit concluded that once he took the luggage in hand in New Jersey, it became “readily accessible,” and the FOPA immunity was lost. And this is indeed a sensible reading of the statutory text: im lost, wouldn't our firearm be considered "readily accessible" the moment we take our luggage out of the car to check it in the air port?

flying out of the state might not be a reasonable deviation by whoever the leo is youre dealing with, so it seems like a hit or miss you might get arrested but the chances of the prosecutor pursuing charges are slim to none, but do you really want to spend a few nights in jail?

why not just fly out of Philly or Leigh valley to be safe?

i can say this though, NJ loves Christie, They go crazy for him, NJ will vote for Christie till the day he dies and then continue on voting for his clone If Christie wasnt too busy making back room deals and got off his ass and helped support the Republican party in south Jersey, Niki probably would've won and maybe we would have won a few extra seats but Christie had some deal with Sweeney and Norcross not to help the Republican party and in reality he probably didnt want to either Christie being the main man in a Democratic state makes him more popular and gets his name out there more, people love him more for his "image" that he can cross over political parties and get things done

i helped a good amout in the Niki trunk campaign last election and all i can say is most gun owners are either, oblivious to whats going on (old time hunters and fishers), they dont care and spew the same crap we hear everyday "NJ is lost, its a communist state, if they want my AK or AR they can have them bullets first, i will not comply", or they own one revolver from like 50 years ago and believe they're a true gun owner and then say things like, "why does anyone need more than 10 rounds, or why does anyone need assault rifles, i feel perfectly safe with my 6 shooter locked up in my attic" Sweeney saw something in the last elections that basically told him it was ok to come out as anti gun or even that if he wanted to win as governor he had to come out as anti gun, these politicians arent stupid, they spend all of our money on polls and studies when elections come around, and they know exactly what to say and what to vote for to get reelected, and in Sweeneys case, knows what to say to run for governor

i would go, im in Philly every weekend about

ryan maybe you can better explain this to me, why would Gura want the Peruta case be made moot? Update May 1, 2014 - It seems that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was not amused by San Diego Sheriff Gore’s failure to file a response. Today the courtordered him to: “Appellee William D. Gore is ordered to notify this Court in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order of his position on the pending motions to intervene or that he takes no position. Appellee William D. Gore is further ordered to respond within fourteen days of the date of this order to the suggestion that this case is moot. See Opp’n to Pet. for Reh’g En Banc 16, Richards v. Prieto, No. 11-16255 (“Even were Peruta vacated tomorrow, neither this Court nor the state could do anything to keep Gore from printing permits to all otherwise-qualified comers. The Peruta dispute is moot.”). He shall explain any change in his policy that could affect this Court’s jurisdiction over this case.” So much for the perceived mutual admiration society between SAF and the NRA. When I read Alan Gura’s opposition to the petition for a rehearing in Richards the quote from above stuck out like a sore thumb. The SAF, having failed to obtain a published, binding precedent in its case tried to torpedo the NRA case by suggesting to the court that they render the Peruta decision moot. If the court renders the Peruta decision moot, vacates its decision and depublishes it then it prohibits the Peruta decision from being cited in any future case.

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2014/05/14/10-56971%20Response%20to%20Order.pdf has anyone seen this update on Peruta, good news for us

never mind found it

do you have a link?

probably has to do with a contract, i wouldn't be surprised if Saf drops him once his contract is up The NRA was really on its game when they got Clement

this is true but i believe its best we have Clement argue such a big case, he is more than certain to win the case its no surprise that Gura almost lost Heller and Mc donald, well technically Clement won Mc donald, the court basically ignored Gura in Mc donald and didnt even use Guras arguments in Heller, its also true that Heller didnt want Gura to argue the "Heller 2" case

i truly believe scotus would rather have Clement argue the case rather than Gura, if what the articles say is true it sounds like Gura isnt that good of a lawyer i didnt know Gura asked scotus to overturn Slaughter house, which is ridiculous, a case like that has to be perfect i wonder why saf keeps Gura

technically it seems like they did, but i wouldn't put it past the ATF to twist the words around some more to make it mean what they want ianal