springfieldxds

no where to go from here guys, scotus has officially given up on the 2nd amendment

denied!!!!!

still waiting for the orders

another Albanian right here! lol praying for a good outcome on monday

well at least its not bad news

looks like well know on the 25th hopefully

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/drake-v-jerejian/ it still shows pending here, unless they're really slow on the updating

still pending, so they probably didnt get to it this conference and itll have to wait till their next conference

no news yet, still pending

you dont think the courts will improperly apply intermediate scrutiny like they have been doing for years on gun laws, they say they're using intermediate scrutiny when in fact they use rational basis review, i dont believe this will change even in drake gets decided in our favor the state will say the new law is for the safety of the people, they will give no evidence to back their claims like drake and the 3rd circuit will apply "intermediate scrutiny" and still side with the state, just like what happened with drake and all are other gun laws in question

5.4% of teams expect the Court to call for the views of the Solicitor General what does this mean

Are we allowed to contact the supreme Court office and urge them to take a case we feel is important?

hopefully the supreme court will grant drake a hearing before they decide to hear en banc

The supreme Court of PA (I'm not sure about DE) I believe has already ruled carrying a firearm in public is protected by the state constitution So just because the 3rd ruled its not by the 2nd amendment that won't change a thing in PA because their constitution supposedly grants more protection Am I wrong I'm thinking this?

not exactly, though i agree with you that Kennedy refusing the stay is not a good thing, it doesn't really speak about how they feel about its constitutionality of the law, courts have expressed over and over again that refusing a stay should give no hint in which way they would rule take the 9th circuit for example, they ruled that California's good cause is unconstitutional but they did issue a stay on the ruling as the state figures out what it wants to do imo it seems more likely they would allow stays for the states and government than for single or more plaintiffs

The 9th circuit hasn't ruled on the case yet, they just refused to put the law on hold while they go through the appeals process They're not asking the supreme Court to take the case (yet) they're just asking that Scotus puts the law on hold while they appeal to the 9th

Any word yet on any of the judges calling for en banc

1026 no 156 yes

I believe he would need an fid card to legally transport but I could be wrong

Having your firearm locked in the the trunk separate from the ammo is the same exact thing as being disarmed in my opinion Its not like a criminal is going to let you unlock your gun, load the ammo in the magazine, insert said magazine then chamber a round And if you wanted it for protection in your sons house well that's not how nj sees it, if you used your gun in your sons house for protection you'll be looking at some serious jail time

How do you perform the SBI background check online and are the other 2 forms still done by paper and handed in to the local PD? Thanks

First thing first get the reason for the denial, you can even contact your local PD and ask them about it, but you should definitely fill out the form

Wow! That's some elaborate range qualifications, with the laws test and the required qualification would the permit be accessible even without justifiable need lol

what is the qualifications to get a permit in NJ?