1LtCAP

we'll never "see" the impact their leaving will have, as the mainstream media will never publish it.

i say "as an experiment", because really, that is the only way we have a chance of seeing that happen. even with a small spate of crazieness, there will be no denying the significant lowering of violent crime, and that afterall is the goal here.

nooooo!! that can't be!

PERHAPS a counter recomendation could be to loosen up our guns laws to modern day good state standards, along with becoming "shall issue" concerning carry. do it as an experiment for 3 years. if in 3 years, violent crime hasn't dropped, then they can have what they're proposing. a letter with stats from states that've enacted the easier carry laws would be fairly convincing. if one life can be saved, we have to try.

QUESTION, kinda on topic, but not at the same time. i thought i'd seen something in here with links to the email addys of all of our legislators.....but can't find it now? if i'm right, could someone be so kind as to steer me there again? please?

speaking of that....i thought i'd seen something in here with links to all of their email addys? but i can't find it now? if so, could i beg someone to post a link gto the links? pleeeeeze? thasnk

little steps

my mom was like this for as long as i can remember. you just have to be patient, and work on/with her slowly and patiently. mine came 'round, and will be taking her first shooting lesson very very soon.

so here's my question. probably to the le in here, if you guys can answer. those that say "we will refuse to enforce any new stricter laws"..........wouldn't they pretty much just end up being fired if they didn't?

there's an article in the courier post about this. they interviewed an anti-gunner. he was actually saying that changnig any laws wouldn't have helped that kid. but that they should more aggressively enforce the laws on the books, which would probably have helped him.

dam...beat me to it.

so once again then, the gun free zone is proven to be a complete and utter failure.

i can't believe they're airing so many pro gun people. now if only one of the bigger stations would pick up something like this. thanks for the heads up sir!!

just outta curiousity.....is that campus gun free?

thank god it wasn't a high capacity knife, or a semi auto knife........

done did it

I was only calling out the first obvious one.........

the article starts off with incorrect statements.

These piss me off to no end. first off, i think that the 10,000 number is bs. secondly, they hype it with things like "record rate",. know what guns i'd turn in for the pennies they're offering. an old shotgun that's been around since i was a kid. i don't think it even has firing pins anymore, but i'd turn it in for a few bucks towards something cool. would i turn in anything "normal"? EFF no!

well, if heat was the problem, there was neither of those involved, as long as it was doing something....and if i recall from reading, it said that the thermostat was set too low? so no risk of loss of life there........

i understand the heating unit was in there. i read that. but the point still remains. without his consent, there is no one that has any right whatsoever to be in his apartment. unless it was in his lease papers he signed.

in my instance i more than likely will be getting my nj state inspectors lisence soon, along with emission repair license. i think...not sure....but i think i need to have my nj dl for those.

someone mentioned using a tax form from pa to show residency, and nj dl for photo id. what if one were renting a room in pa? will showing the room rental agreement be sufficient?

the search is the issue? i'm more concerned with the fact that there was truly no good reason for the police(or anyone for that matter) to be in his apartment without his consent.

and when we try to educate them, more often than not, they look at us like we're fruitcakes.