DeerSlayer

I will not be renewing my ANJRPC membership, they can shove Cherry Ridge range where the sun don't shine.

Yes Nappen dropped the ball on his appeal. Took his money, and is just completely ignoring him, for over a year. And yes when that happened, SAF pulled back their funding for his case. It's possible that may come back with the Po6 push to re open these case's.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT: A 2nd source has come forward with one of our Po6 members and also confirmed the allegations of the 1st source. That during a private meeting last year at the NJSAFE conference, it was discussed and agreed on by the Law firm retained to handle the Almeida v NJ carry case, and the NJ 2nd Amendment leadership, aka as Scott Bach to quietly shut down the Case and not push it forward to FEDERAL COURTS, where it was widely believed to be successful due to the nature of the case and the burden imposed on the Plaintiff, It is said that these discussions also included attempts to convince those behind the recall Sweeney campaign to not proceed forward with the plan. This was all in an attempt to protect the CC POTUS run and THE NOW, SOON TO BE FAILED EXECUTIVE ORDER 180 backroom deals. This is the 2nd source with inner circle involvement and knowledge that has provided the same information and validated the allegations of the 1st source. Well, there you have it. It is safe to say that our lives, the safety of our loved one's, the rghts given to us under the U.S constitution to keep and BEAR arms....but most importantly, our rights to defend the lives of our loved ones and self against these criminals that rule the streets have been gambled with and our safety is kept in jeopardy by our own people that are spineless lawyers, and political hacks. All for their political gain/status, Finacial security/gain and for backroom deals that from the beginning was giving you meatless bones, but is destined to be a failure due to the hard work of the anti gun crowd in Trenton. Now, of course we will jot allow these cases to just disappear. Michael Tumminelli and Almeida v NJ have been consolidated and lives on to move forward with the hired out of State law firms. We need your help to make sure this momentum continues.. Visit us and consider supporting it. Www.partyof6.org

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT: A 2nd source has come forward with one of our Po6 members and also confirmed the allegations of the 1st source. That during a private meeting last year at the NJSAFE conference, it was discussed and agreed on by the Law firm retained to handle the Almeida v NJ carry case, and the NJ 2nd Amendment leadership, aka as Scott Bach to quietly shut down the Case and not push it forward to FEDERAL COURTS, where it was widely believed to be successful due to the nature of the case and the burden imposed on the Plaintiff, It is said that these discussions also included attempts to convince those behind the recall Sweeney campaign to not proceed forward with the plan. This was all in an attempt to protect the CC POTUS run and THE NOW, SOON TO BE FAILED EXECUTIVE ORDER 180 backroom deals. This is the 2nd source with inner circle involvement and knowledge that has provided the same information and validated the allegations of the 1st source. Well, there you have it. It is safe to say that our lives, the safety of our loved one's, the rghts given to us under the U.S constitution to keep and BEAR arms....but most importantly, our rights to defend the lives of our loved ones and self against these criminals that rule the streets have been gambled with and our safety is kept in jeopardy by our own people that are spineless lawyers, and political hacks. All for their political gain/status, Finacial security/gain and for backroom deals that from the beginning was giving you meatless bones, but is destined to be a failure due to the hard work of the anti gun crowd in Trenton. Now, of course we will not allow these cases to just disappear. Michael Tumminelli and Almeida v NJ have been consolidated and lives on to move forward with the hired out of State law firms. We need your help to make sure this momentum continues.. Visit us and consider supporting it. Www.partyof6.org

I'm glad you're still fighting! Long live the Party of 6!

Latest Almeida update, copied from Facebook 2A group this evening. Status update/Information Release Some of you may have heard of the latest developments involving the DC carry case win and the Almeida v NJ case that was practically a non-issue and dead due to the lack of work, not being performed by the powers to be in NJ. Due The hard work of the “Party of Six” in not giving up with fighting for us all in NJ, not taking a “NO” for an answer, and eliminating the “WHEEL CHOCKS”, it is finally taking a positive step forward. Due to a serious lack of communication (non-existent is a better word), I have discontinued my pursuit with my case with the Previous Law firm that was spare heading it. In my opinion, we had a perfect opportunity to take a serious 2A case, that not only challenged the “Justifiable need” extra burden and unclear wording with a case that should have Cleary meet the “JN standard, but did not, but it also was an opportunity to challenge violations to NJ’s and the United States of America constitution. This was the original plan since the beginning of the Almeida case. But after the Appellate Courts decision, the case seemed to disappear without further explanation from those hired to handle it. We had a guaranteed funding source that was eager to help take this new case all the way up to the SCOTUS, it was by a National 2A organization. But that funding stopped suddenly after the case failed to move forward. What is even more disturbing, the Appellate court ruling on the Almeida case was brought to my attention by Mark Cheeseman, not the law firm retained to handle this case. Until this day, we still await a call, email or explanation as to why the “plan” was terminated. In the mean time, the threats have increased, some very serious incidents have actually taking place and the NJ Law firms and all of the 2A organizations in NJ are ignoring our requests for help We have our 3rd party sources that tell us it was due to influence from Scott Bach allegedly, the back room deals with the soon to be failed EO180, and also the relationship with those parties involved and the Governor CC running for POTOUS, so that it not make him upset and jeopardize EO 180 or the POTUS RUN. Of course this is all 3rd party, unverified allegations, so I make no claims to its legitimacy, and I accuse none of these individuals of wrong doing, I am only relaying 3rd party information that was given to me as possible reasons, but none-less, seems suspect due to the timing. We have now hired a law firm that is NOT affiliated in any way with anyone, any Business or organization in NJ. We did this for a reason, there can be no corruption, no influence, and no political interference. Only the best interest for you and I, the people of NJ. This out of State law firm has teamed up with 2 other firms. 1 in Pennsylvania and the other in California. All 3 law firms have had success in winning 2A cases nationally, one of the firms is involved with winning Baker v. Kealoha (at the same time Peruta v. San Diego was won. These 3 are teaming up to help us win in NJ, because they believe if we fight the good fight, and continue that fight, we will win! But we need all of your help in making this possible, because if we wait for the non-believers, the wheel chocks in NJ, or those that only fight hard on the “criminal prosecution” side of the gun rights battle, we will NEVER WIN our individual 2A rights in NJ. The most recent case against DC started by the plaintiffs filing a complaint with the Federal Courts including an injunction, their case was much less severe than mine. WE PLAN ON ALSO FILING A COMPLAINT WITH THE FEDERAL COURTS, a Restraining order against the State of NJ, along with additional legal arguments. The goal is to have part of the JN wording, and burden, If not all of it unconstitutional as it is being applied. It will not be like the DRAKE case, where the 3rd circuit ruled that “Justifiable need was constitutional” it will be attacking it in a different angle. Similar to how the recent DC Plaintiffs won. Now, we could have been there at the Federal level already, but we are getting no Support from the NJ Laws firms, the NJ2AS leadership, the ANJRPC and their leadership or the NRA. (Well, the NRA would support us, but the only way to get their support is with a request coming from the NJ NRA Rep. and that has proven to be useless. Ask yourself, WHY is NO NJ 2A organization supporting NJ cases, either logistically, financially, or with any other supportive role…it is as if they want nothing to do with winning or fighting for a carry case. Why is that? I have no answer for you, but the Party of Six has tried to get those answers from everyone I mentioned, for a long time and we have all been ignored. They have refused to help, they have refused to answer our emails, or phone calls, so we must fight this good fight alone and start all over again. But we will use two existing cases and have two more as a backup and build on it, The case that has just been confirmed to be consolidated with mine is of a Veteran, Michael Tummeneli. He has been requesting for help for over a year now, but only to be ignored. Why? Ironically, I just read there is a similar case being started for a Veteran out of Picatinny Arsenal, that faces the same challenges as Mike, a fund me site has been created and is being controlled, not by the Plaintiff, but by the Law firm. They control the funds, regardless of the outcome. I sure hope that outcome is a positive one for the Plaintiff…godspeed I wish them luck, as our common goal is to bring down NJ’s unjust carry laws. Maybe whatever donated money is left over can be donated to help other Veterans in obtaining their NJ carry License? I ask that you read what I am telling you with an open mind, and Judge for yourself. Why haven’t we won in NJ? Why have we been ignored and why are we now forced to terminate our relationship with these NJ lawyers and 2A organizations, but hire from the outside, hire law firms that believe in us and that we can win! They are shocked at the lack of results and the lack of trying in NJ…meanwhile, they are winning in the COURTS in other parts of the country? We hope to win in NJ as well, with your help we will. In the next few short weeks, we will be publishing the outlined plan of action, including the first steps these 3 Law firms are taking to file the process. Between the main members of the Party of six, and these lawyers, we have spent many, many hours on conference calls and planning meetings together. I can honestly say I’ve spent more hours communicating in the last 3 weeks with these firms, than I had in almost 2 previous wasted years dealing with NJ firms. That means a lot to us. Visit us at www.partyof6.org to learn more, please consider donating to help make this fight a good one. And we shall see you at the prevailing party! Thank you, Albert Almeida

Here's a recent party of 6 update. Status update/Information Release Some of you may have heard of the latest developments involving the DC carry case win and the Almeida v NJ case that was practically a non-issue and dead due to the lack of work, not being performed by the powers to be in NJ. Due The hard work of the “Party of Six” in not giving up with fighting for us all in NJ, not taking a “NO” for an answer, and eliminating the “WHEEL CHOCKS”, it is finally taking a positive step forward. Due to a serious lack of communication (non-existent is a better word), I have discontinued my pursuit with my case with the Previous Law firm that was spare heading it. In my opinion, we had a perfect opportunity to take a serious 2A case, that not only challenged the “Justifiable need” extra burden and unclear wording with a case that should have Cleary meet the “JN standard, but did not, but it also was an opportunity to challenge violations to NJ’s and the United States of America constitution. This was the original plan since the beginning of the Almeida case. But after the Appellate Courts decision, the case seemed to disappear without further explanation from those hired to handle it. We had a guaranteed funding source that was eager to help take this new case all the way up to the SCOTUS, it was by a National 2A organization. But that funding stopped suddenly after the case failed to move forward. What is even more disturbing, the Appellate court ruling on the Almeida case was brought to my attention by Mark Cheeseman, not the law firm retained to handle this case. Until this day, we still await a call, email or explanation as to why the “plan” was terminated. In the mean time, the threats have increased, some very serious incidents have actually taking place and the NJ Law firms and all of the 2A organizations in NJ are ignoring our requests for help We have our 3rd party sources that tell us it was due to influence from Scott Bach allegedly, the back room deals with the soon to be failed EO180, and also the relationship with those parties involved and the Governor CC running for POTOUS, so that it not make him upset and jeopardize EO 180 or the POTUS RUN. Of course this is all 3rd party, unverified allegations, so I make no claims to its legitimacy, and I accuse none of these individuals of wrong doing, I am only relaying 3rd party information that was given to me as possible reasons, but none-less, seems suspect due to the timing. We have now hired a law firm that is NOT affiliated in any way with anyone, any Business or organization in NJ. We did this for a reason, there can be no corruption, no influence, and no political interference. Only the best interest for you and I, the people of NJ. This out of State law firm has teamed up with 2 other firms. 1 in Pennsylvania and the other in California. All 3 law firms have had success in winning 2A cases nationally, one of the firms is involved with winning Baker v. Kealoha (at the same time Peruta v. San Diego was won. These 3 are teaming up to help us win in NJ, because they believe if we fight the good fight, and continue that fight, we will win! But we need all of your help in making this possible, because if we wait for the non-believers, the wheel chocks in NJ, or those that only fight hard on the “criminal prosecution” side of the gun rights battle, we will NEVER WIN our individual 2A rights in NJ. The most recent case against DC started by the plaintiffs filing a complaint with the Federal Courts including an injunction, their case was much less severe than mine. WE PLAN ON ALSO FILING A COMPLAINT WITH THE FEDERAL COURTS, a Restraining order against the State of NJ, along with additional legal arguments. The goal is to have part of the JN wording, and burden, If not all of it unconstitutional as it is being applied. It will not be like the DRAKE case, where the 3rd circuit ruled that “Justifiable need was constitutional” it will be attacking it in a different angle. Similar to how the recent DC Plaintiffs won. Now, we could have been there at the Federal level already, but we are getting no Support from the NJ Laws firms, the NJ2AS leadership, the ANJRPC and their leadership or the NRA. (Well, the NRA would support us, but the only way to get their support is with a request coming from the NJ NRA Rep. and that has proven to be useless. Ask yourself, WHY is NO NJ 2A organization supporting NJ cases, either logistically, financially, or with any other supportive role…it is as if they want nothing to do with winning or fighting for a carry case. Why is that? I have no answer for you, but the Party of Six has tried to get those answers from everyone I mentioned, for a long time and we have all been ignored. They have refused to help, they have refused to answer our emails, or phone calls, so we must fight this good fight alone and start all over again. But we will use two existing cases and have two more as a backup and build on it, The case that has just been confirmed to be consolidated with mine is of a Veteran, Michael Tummeneli. He has been requesting for help for over a year now, but only to be ignored. Why? Ironically, I just read there is a similar case being started for a Veteran out of Picatinny Arsenal, that faces the same challenges as Mike, a fund me site has been created and is being controlled, not by the Plaintiff, but by the Law firm. They control the funds, regardless of the outcome. I sure hope that outcome is a positive one for the Plaintiff…godspeed I wish them luck, as our common goal is to bring down NJ’s unjust carry laws. Maybe whatever donated money is left over can be donated to help other Veterans in obtaining their NJ carry License? I ask that you read what I am telling you with an open mind, and Judge for yourself. Why haven’t we won in NJ? Why have we been ignored and why are we now forced to terminate our relationship with these NJ lawyers and 2A organizations, but hire from the outside, hire law firms that believe in us and that we can win! They are shocked at the lack of results and the lack of trying in NJ…meanwhile, they are winning in the COURTS in other parts of the country? We hope to win in NJ as well, with your help we will. In the next few short weeks, we will be publishing the outlined plan of action, including the first steps these 3 Law firms are taking to file the process. Between the main members of the Party of six, and these lawyers, we have spent many, many hours on conference calls and planning meetings together. I can honestly say I’ve spent more hours communicating in the last 3 weeks with these firms, than I had in almost 2 previous wasted years dealing with NJ firms. That means a lot to us. Visit us at www.partyof6.org to learn more, please consider donating to help make this fight a good one. And we shall see you at the prevailing party! Thank you, Albert Almeida

Here's a party of 6 update that just posted to the second amendment rights fighters page on Facebook from Albert Almeida. Figured I would share it here for anyone interested in the case. Status update/Information Release Some of you may have heard of the latest developments involving the DC carry case win and the Almeida v NJ case that was practically a non-issue and dead due to the lack of work, not being performed by the powers to be in NJ. Due The hard work of the “Party of Six” in not giving up with fighting for us all in NJ, not taking a “NO” for an answer, and eliminating the “WHEEL CHOCKS”, it is finally taking a positive step forward. Due to a serious lack of communication (non-existent is a better word), I have discontinued my pursuit with my case with the Previous Law firm that was spare heading it. In my opinion, we had a perfect opportunity to take a serious 2A case, that not only challenged the “Justifiable need” extra burden and unclear wording with a case that should have Cleary meet the “JN standard, but did not, but it also was an opportunity to challenge violations to NJ’s and the United States of America constitution. This was the original plan since the beginning of the Almeida case. But after the Appellate Courts decision, the case seemed to disappear without further explanation from those hired to handle it. We had a guaranteed funding source that was eager to help take this new case all the way up to the SCOTUS, it was by a National 2A organization. But that funding stopped suddenly after the case failed to move forward. What is even more disturbing, the Appellate court ruling on the Almeida case was brought to my attention by Mark Cheeseman, not the law firm retained to handle this case. Until this day, we still await a call, email or explanation as to why the “plan” was terminated. In the mean time, the threats have increased, some very serious incidents have actually taking place and the NJ Law firms and all of the 2A organizations in NJ are ignoring our requests for help We have our 3rd party sources that tell us it was due to influence from Scott Bach allegedly, the back room deals with the soon to be failed EO180, and also the relationship with those parties involved and the Governor CC running for POTOUS, so that it not make him upset and jeopardize EO 180 or the POTUS RUN. Of course this is all 3rd party, unverified allegations, so I make no claims to its legitimacy, and I accuse none of these individuals of wrong doing, I am only relaying 3rd party information that was given to me as possible reasons, but none-less, seems suspect due to the timing. We have now hired a law firm that is NOT affiliated in any way with anyone, any Business or organization in NJ. We did this for a reason, there can be no corruption, no influence, and no political interference. Only the best interest for you and I, the people of NJ. This out of State law firm has teamed up with 2 other firms. 1 in Pennsylvania and the other in California. All 3 law firms have had success in winning 2A cases nationally, one of the firms is involved with winning Baker v. Kealoha (at the same time Peruta v. San Diego was won. These 3 are teaming up to help us win in NJ, because they believe if we fight the good fight, and continue that fight, we will win! But we need all of your help in making this possible, because if we wait for the non-believers, the wheel chocks in NJ, or those that only fight hard on the “criminal prosecution” side of the gun rights battle, we will NEVER WIN our individual 2A rights in NJ. The most recent case against DC started by the plaintiffs filing a complaint with the Federal Courts including an injunction, their case was much less severe than mine. WE PLAN ON ALSO FILING A COMPLAINT WITH THE FEDERAL COURTS, a Restraining order against the State of NJ, along with additional legal arguments. The goal is to have part of the JN wording, and burden, If not all of it unconstitutional as it is being applied. It will not be like the DRAKE case, where the 3rd circuit ruled that “Justifiable need was constitutional” it will be attacking it in a different angle. Similar to how the recent DC Plaintiffs won. Now, we could have been there at the Federal level already, but we are getting no Support from the NJ Laws firms, the NJ2AS leadership, the ANJRPC and their leadership or the NRA. (Well, the NRA would support us, but the only way to get their support is with a request coming from the NJ NRA Rep. and that has proven to be useless. Ask yourself, WHY is NO NJ 2A organization supporting NJ cases, either logistically, financially, or with any other supportive role…it is as if they want nothing to do with winning or fighting for a carry case. Why is that? I have no answer for you, but the Party of Six has tried to get those answers from everyone I mentioned, for a long time and we have all been ignored. They have refused to help, they have refused to answer our emails, or phone calls, so we must fight this good fight alone and start all over again. But we will use two existing cases and have two more as a backup and build on it, The case that has just been confirmed to be consolidated with mine is of a Veteran, Michael Tummeneli. He has been requesting for help for over a year now, but only to be ignored. Why? Ironically, I just read there is a similar case being started for a Veteran out of Picatinny Arsenal, that faces the same challenges as Mike, a fund me site has been created and is being controlled, not by the Plaintiff, but by the Law firm. They control the funds, regardless of the outcome. I sure hope that outcome is a positive one for the Plaintiff…godspeed I wish them luck, as our common goal is to bring down NJ’s unjust carry laws. Maybe whatever donated money is left over can be donated to help other Veterans in obtaining their NJ carry License? I ask that you read what I am telling you with an open mind, and Judge for yourself. Why haven’t we won in NJ? Why have we been ignored and why are we now forced to terminate our relationship with these NJ lawyers and 2A organizations, but hire from the outside, hire law firms that believe in us and that we can win! They are shocked at the lack of results and the lack of trying in NJ…meanwhile, they are winning in the COURTS in other parts of the country? We hope to win in NJ as well, with your help we will. In the next few short weeks, we will be publishing the outlined plan of action, including the first steps these 3 Law firms are taking to file the process. Between the main members of the Party of six, and these lawyers, we have spent many, many hours on conference calls and planning meetings together. I can honestly say I’ve spent more hours communicating in the last 3 weeks with these firms, than I had in almost 2 previous wasted years dealing with NJ firms. That means a lot to us. Visit us at www.partyof6.org to learn more, please consider donating to help make this fight a good one. And we shall see you at the prevailing party! Thank you, Albert Almeida

Por15 makes the chassis black in a rattle can, I just bought some for my wrangler. Going to try it, seems less messy than the brush and can.

I painted all my calipers when I bought the truck. Always lubed the slide pins and stuff. Anti seize on all my cross drilled and slotted rotor mounting surfaces. And replace one front brake hose during a brake job once. When I had the bed off the frame I used a needle scaler on the entire back side of the frame. Then painted everything with Por15 chassis black. I did the underside of the bed with Por15 gray. And threw on a set of bilstine 5100's while they were easy to get to. Looks like factory under there again.

Call titles unlimited in Alabama. The way they work is, its a non title state. You basically sell them the vehicle on paper with a bill of sale. They then sell it back to you with an Alabama bill of sale, that you then take to motor vehicle NJ will then issue you a title for that vehicle. I've used them in the past. Alabama has a few companies that provide this same service.

My 05 ram got the rusty bed wheel well. I replaced the entire bedside. Now the passenger side is starting to do the same thing. I'll probably be replacing that side as well. But it's still better than a Ford or Chevy in my opinion. It's really been a great truck. Don't buy a hemi before 05 the first couple years had top end issues. Mine just turned 100k and other than a water pump, an EGR valve, and one 02 sensor it's been solid over the decade I've owned it.

Even more fun than that is when the spark plugs break off in the head. Or going back a couple more years to 02 or older on the triton engines the plugs blow out of the heads with the threads, and a coil pack ejects into the hood.

Different group, SAPPA is part of Tpath I believe. They're working on their RICCO case. PO6 is pushing to take a Justifiable need case to the SCOTUS, to have Justifiable need declared unconstitutional. Similar to a Heller or McDonald type landmark style case. Two different approaches to achieve a common goal.

Spread the word, join the Facebook 2A groups where we discuss all this stuff. And show up to the tavern meetings. If you decide to donate this is where to do so. http://gogetfunding.com/po6fightingfor2arightsinnj/

Then apply to be denied and join. You can donate, they have a "go fund me" set up to take this case national. Just need a NJ attorney that's willing to take the case to the next level. That's been proving difficult apparently. Are you on Facebook?

Gotcha thanks. I was close lol...

No he didn't get a permit, he was denied. The judge told him to change his profession if he was too scared to do his job without a firearm. Or he had the option of hiring armed security to follow him around. Just recently the same group of gang bangers that have threatened to kill him spray painted their direct intentions with his name, to take him out on one of his buildings. Then they shot out all the front windows. He met with Newark PD about it today, and they basically told him they're working on it... lol... If the Bloods, Crips, & Latin Kings all tag your name on a building saying they're going to kill you, that's apparently not justifiable need in NJ to qualify for a permit.

You cannot own a Plumbing, HVAC, or Electrical company in NJ without a license either. You must apprentice for 5 years, attend 4 years of school, then take your master test and pass to become a master before you're allowed to own a company in those trades. So it's a similar scheme as well. NJ sucks...

Although I do have great respect for the man, and everything he has done for NJ gun owners. This is one instance where he fucked up. No one is perfect my bro.

It won't work, we've discussed this exact senerio on this forum before. Search my posts for the thread. Basically in order to open a security company in NJ you have to have a prior minimum of 5 years experience as a law enforcement officer. Plus even if you found a cop to be the owner of your company, the judge can still deny your permit to carry "while working as a bonded security guard" once he finds out your little scheme. So no its not a viable option unfortunately. They're one step ahead of your thinking...

Yes, because he didn't get his permit using Nappen. Just a huge bill, and an unwilling attorney to take the case national. The SAF was on board with funding to bring the case to a national level. Nappen dropped the ball filing the appeal to make that happen. Why? Great question... but it has a lot to do with Scott Bach, the NRA, and painting Chris Christy in a bad light during his presidential campaign... for more information visit the Party of 6 website... "Stand down guys, we have something big in the work's" really f**ked over Albert Almeida, & the rest of us is what happened...

Here's a link to the Party of 6 website for anyone interested in the group. http://partyof6.org

So I'm Facebook friends with Albert Almeida. He is one of the original members of the Party of 6. And manages about 100 properties in the Newark area. There are threads on here about his CCW case in NJ. He had credible Death threats from gang bangers. The judge told him to change jobs, and refused to issue his permit. I sent him a link to this thread, he read it and told me to tell you to check out the party of 6 website, and not to hire Evan Nappen for your court case if you decide to apply. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saf-funds-challenge-to-new-jersey-carry-law-300039743.html

I sold my 6.0 E350 and bought an older 7.3L. I had the ARP stud kit installed on the 6.0L after the head gasket blew. It's junk and I will never buy another. Better off with the V10 gas engine.