HBecwithFn7

If that's the case, then I'm covered with the above. But, still, having to debate this kind of "legalese" with a LEO at the time of incident is dangerous. We need something absolutely clear that all can understand. If I collect/discharge anyone, it would be only to go to/from the range or to an eatery before/after the range session. The only other exception I could need would be something like stopping at Sarco for supplies, before going to HG (Easton). Of course, that's in PA, so ...

If you are still eating at that same Pizza place away from the range, then "FALSE." You can't stop for food. If the eatery is on the range itself, then "TRUE." Also, I do believe that George must have his own guns to qualify under "subsection (e)." If he doesn't, then "FALSE" That's my interpretation, anyway.

Actually, for the two people I mentioned, the above would work. My mom (as a gun owner herself) would qualify under "subsection (e)" above, and it would appear that my nephew is covered under "(3) of subsection f (b)" - but I'll try to get clarification. In any case, these "clarifications" are way too restrictive. We should be able to collect/discharge anyone we choose, as well as stop for meals/food, among other things.

Quick Question - Regarding the so called "companion" bill, A2777 which further "clarifies" reasonable deviations (and for which we await an one word "amendment" to make things easier), I read that part of the enumerated "reasonable deviations" include: It would take me a while to read through all this legalese, so for anyone more familiar with this, does this also include regular family members, etc.? Say I wanted to bring my nephew or Mom to the range with me... Can I stop to pick them up / drop them off, or is that not permitted under these new changes? It seems like (as best I can interpret it), we may only be talking about *certain individuals* (Army personnel, club members, LEOs, etc.)... Just trying to figure it out.

I had this difficulty with a P226 I was renting. They also felt it was mag issue. No matter to me now, I own my own.

Yep. Just guesses. I know the entire passenger list is not all Chinese, and in fact includes 3 Americans among the others. I was only commenting on the possibility that the "kidnappers" (or whatever) were of Chinese origin or targeting Chinese, and/or their intent to land in China or and/or preserve the aircraft. If that is the case, then it was a really stupid move to bring the aircraft to China and/or "neutralize" all the passengers there.

If it is in China, then they're going to have a serious problem in re: what to do with all the Chinese passengers on board. If they're being held captive, somewhere, then I'd have expected escape attempts or contacting their family in China, somehow. Or, maybe, logistical activity (ie. securing food and the like for them). I would have guessed the "terrorists" (or whatever) by now have confiscated all the cell phones, tablets, electronics, etc. to prevent them from contacting family. To date, we've heard nothing from the passengers. I'd have expected to hear from them, or hear of attempts to contact family members and vice versa... I can only conclude that something terribly tragic has happened to them :( If a Chinese terror group is involved, I'm sure they'd lose support quickly if it was discovered that they "neutralized" all those Chinese passengers on home turf. I don't think it's the "government" either - since there's not much new technology to gain from taking an aircraft - the Chinese govt. already has them. Is there much in such an aircraft that is "classified?" I don't think it's in China. If it is, it wouldn't be the swiftest of moves.

So.... what did you wish for?

It's called the "SBI" # on the P2P form. But it's the same number.

I missed it. Can someone please post URLs, YouTube or otherwise? Much appreciated.

I guess he didn't "feel lucky."

This is my understanding with HG (Easton). An underage person can shoot when accompanied by a parent or designated legal guardian (the parent must sign all the consent forms, initially). However, they can't shoot/rent weapons from HG on their own. They can shoot/rent long guns on their own when they turn 18, and hand guns when they turn 21.

Did it say which are the other states that have mag limits? Obviously, we know about NY and CT, and I assume CA.

PM Sent

They must not have any warehouses there yet. That's what did us in up here in NJ. They built two big warehouses. And, in the process, created NJ Tax nexus.

Why, this here! - Jerry Miculek - 30 Caliber "Magazine Clip"

I think he knows.... I just think he needed to have the testifier state the words "carry concealed weapon" for the record, to ensure it was the same term and understanding as his.

Well, it's done! 1K rounds. We'll see what happens.

The 9mm seems to be "147 grains." Is that OK? I'm used to 115-124 grains on 9mm.

They're trying it also in Florida - See This thread in "1st Amendment Lounge."

It's a choke system by Mossberg - Mossberg Choke Page Look at the barrels on this page. Mossberg Barrel Replacements The one I got is # 93021 - 28" accu choke barrel, with modified choke pre-installed, matt finish.

It just depends on what you want. 500=Pump, 930=Semi Auto (and a few more NJ Restrictions like 6+1 and no pistol grip). Take a look on "gunbroker.com" for the "Mossberg 930 Home Security" model in 4+1. That's what I bought. Add another $180 for the accu choke 28" barrel and another $70 or so for the Nordic +2 extension kit (and another $30.00 or so for the CG&G speed bolt handle) and your just about right at MSRP for a JM-Pro anyway. The barrel clamp is optional, but I like it. Also get the Nordic follower.

Not only that, but a "recall" vote can't take place until after the official has served at least 1 year of his/her current term in office. He was just re-inaugurated this year (2014). And, quite frankly, I'm not sure everyone is seeing the "bigger picture" here. Even if a recall vote were successful, remember who'd be taking his place... Ms. Weinberg! Is that not "frying pan into the fire???"

My mom is signing up for it as we speak.

We're getting closer. I'm taking my mother to the range this week. As it turns out, she owns a Walther PPK .22LR. New-in-Box, never fired before. She's had it for some time. She just needed a little training. If that works out, then I may very well reach my goal of getting my sister to let me mentor my nephew.