MauserCollector

I can agree with that as an individual. Honestly though from watching the Militia groups they were very well behaved and an asset in Charlottesville. Not sure if that would always be the case, but it was there. The Militia Members in Charlottesville were made up of members of Lightfoot Militia and Three Percenters from multiple states. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Personally I am not one for rallies. I don't see where they really accomplish anything. I also don't understand the answer. The question wasn't whether it is a right. I was just looking for your or anyone elses opinion. Simple yes or no should one carry concealed if they go to a Save Stonewall Jackson Statue Rally? Is there a way to make it a poll? I am really just curious as to the opinions here.

I disagree. One we shouldn't let White Supremacist Morons hijack rallies. By leaving that is exactly what you would be doing. Two I have yet to see proof they were even in Charlottesville. So far I have only seen Agent Provocateurs. I have seen no pictures of Neo-Nazi, Skinhead, or Aryan Nation members. A good hint is if they are usually covered in Swastika and other ridiculous tattoos. I have however listened to interviews where those on the ground said BLM and "Klan" members were getting off the same buses. Here are some pics I am pretty sure are from the actual rally. Can some one point out the White Supremacists? In the last pic I see 2 morons making a Nazi Salute. Yet no one else is. Wonder why that is? Anyone also wonder why the supposed organizers consist of a comedian being followed by Vice, an anti-gun, Pro-Obama, Occupy Member, and one of the biggest whores on the planet David Duke. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I didn't think you were for laws outlawing carrying at rallies[mention=5135]bhunted[/mention], but is your personal feeling that one shouldn't carry to a rally? Just asking a question. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Some of the arguments in this thread seem to be against carrying period at a rally for say protesting the removal of a Stonewall Jackson Statue. That one should either go unarmed or not go. Is that what some feel? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I don't understand? What administration and what stories? Also what does Pink Pistols being against laws banning firearms at rallies mean? I truly don't understand not being argumentative. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

If the law allows open carry why not? The militia members who were well armed in Charlottesville may have prevented further violence by Antifa in the videos I saw. Also where are all the pictures of the Neo-Nazis and KKK members in Charlottesville during the Unite the Right Rally that everyone keeps talking about? Was it this KKK group that Time Magazine said was in Charlottesville two weekends ago? Because while that photo was from Charlottesville it was taken over a month earlier during an actual Klan Rally http://mashable.com/2017/08/14/pictures-charlottesville-white-supremacist-ku-klux-klan/#8jflR5DrEqqx Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I have bought and sold many houses. As a buyer I used an attorney. As a seller 75% of the time I used the title company the attorney used. Land or complicated deals yes attorney is needed. Complete renovation flip no attorney is needed. Both buyer and seller using only a title company was the norm in South Jersey and Delaware. Maybe someone from South Jersey can chime in if it is still the norm. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Just use a title company. No need for an attorney. Especially as the seller. Waste of money. South Jersey neither seller or buyer uses attorney. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The law will not deter the scumbags it is meant to punish. I still haven't read the statue, but I hope the having a dog house and not on a chain is good enough to leave the dog unattended outside. If not the law needs to be fixed quick. Try leaving a Weimaraner inside all day while at work. I know two brain surgeons who did just that. Dog ran through the sliding glass door. Unfortunately those two reproduced. Luckily it was just once. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That works too. For myself it wouldn't because shed is full and I wouldn't want to leave garage open due to concealed access to a door to the house. Plus it is also pretty full as well. With that being said there are multiple options that are better than chaining a dog to a tree. Anyone who thinks it is fine and the dog likes it chain yourself to a tree for 8 hours and tell me how it feels. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

If dog can be free and has a dog house I see no issue. Chain should not substitute for training. Get a fence. Don't want to fence the whole yard fence an area for a dog run and build a house in it with a floor. Believe it or not there have been instances where a dog ends up injuring itself on a chain. They run around and around the tree maybe chasing a rabbit. Now the dog is wrapped around the tree and hanging from the chain. Maybe it gets a leg caught in the chain that cuts off the circulation. I won't do to my dogs what I wouldn't do myself. Simple rule to follow. When I was a kid I liked having forts. What is so hard about building a dog house if you want to leave your dog outside unattended? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

You fence in the yard or use an invisible fence and train the dog. You don't chain them to a tree unattended. Would you like to be chained to a tree? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That's what it sounds like. Which I don't see an issue with. Every wanna be gangsta has a pitbull or King Corso chained up. I would like to chain the gangstas up. If I did some would call me raycist but it has nothing to do with race. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That makes it ok. Basically if you are home dog can be anywhere outside. If you go out dog needs a real house outside. Nothing wrong with that. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Well that part is ridiculous. I guess I have to read the statute. So much for reporting. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

You both are missing the one important aspect of the law and that is animal is chained up. You leave your dog hang out in the snow where he is happy no problem. Same goes for the heat. When he wants to come in he can. Chained up he can not. Chained up is an aspect of the law the way I read the article. I haven't read the actual statute yet, but if chained up is needed for a violation of the law I see no issue. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The way I read the law it isn't bad. Yes I hate nanny state laws, but I like dogs more than people. The law states you can't leave them chained up. Nothing wrong with leaving them outside to run free assuming your property is fenced in and they have some sort of shelter to go into. Law is meant to stop scumbags from leaving chained up dogs to guard places. At the same time people still need to know what breed they have and what temps it can withstand. Husky in sub zero no problem. Shih Tzu will die. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Why in God's name would you want to move to NJ? Did you lose a bet? If it's work do yourself a favor and commute from PA. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The state got taken. Glad I had a soccer tournament and couldn't go. I wouldn't have been too happy standing around all day and coming away empty handed. A bunch of junk got turned in. Yes selling anything to them makes you a participant in their Anti-Gun Propaganda. However being the state was mostly sold junk it does make them look foolish to anyone in the know. No chance I would have sold to the state but I would like to buy out from underneath them any decent Milsurps.

I agree. It isn't very comfortable. It was also a backup. Just did it because I could. Also as I noted didn't have one in the chamber. I don't think I would trust a Tok period with one in the chamber. This is one that had the safety added. Ankle Holster is a lot better for backup. One situation I did see where small of the back was helpful was the off duty cop who shot the guys at the gas station. He slowly said he was reaching for his wallet with gun pointed at him and quickly pulled his pistol and started firing. I would have to train a heck of a lot more to be comfortable doing that, and find a SA/DA that is thin like the Tok. As a backup Tok's have their advantages. It is one of only two pistols I know of that will consistently and easily defeat Type II Bodyarm. 7.62x25 goes right through a Kevlar Helmet where .45ACP bounces off of it. The other is 5and7 but you need to make a lot of holes for it to be as effective. With body armor being accessible to all you never know when the bad guy will be wearing a vest.

Did anyone in a free state notice you were carrying? What was their reaction? I pretty much know the answer. They could care less and it didn't bother them at all. Carrying is a way of life in free states. No different than someone wearing sunglasses. I too have the same CCW Permits. I have carried in PA a few times now. Beretta 96 on my hip. Sometimes Tok M/57 IWB in the small of my back too. Very thin pistol and quite accurate. One time I went with both and a Iver Johnson .380 Pony on my ankle just because I could. Beretta had one in the chamber. Other two did not. Beretta is my main carry piece just because I am most comfortable with it. It is the second handgun I bought. The in the back thing is no good for driving. Beretta was plenty comfortable. Ankle holster is fine with long pants but doesn't look good with shorts. Kind of like wearing black socks with shorts. Also ankle holster obviously is not concealed with shorts, which isn't an issue in PA. In fact anyone who can legally own a pistol can open carry in PA (outside Philly). I prefer concealed. I don't think most PA residents would care either way. This past Winter was the first time I carried in years. I had a CCW in South Carolina 20 years ago. At first I was constantly adjusting my shirt and holster, but pretty quickly I stopped worrying about it. States that don't allow open carry I would be more concerned with anything showing just because of the laws. I actually enjoyed the read AVB. What is your wife's feeling about you carrying? Mine isn't really a gun person, but now they don't bother her either. 10 years ago when we drove to Florida and got gas in either VA or NC (don't recall) she freaked out when she saw a guy with a pistol open carried on his hip. She thought he was there to rob the place. I had to laugh and then pointed out the other 2 people carrying as well. Now she is more accustomed to it. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Courts have issued injunction on almost all the Anti Firearms Laws in CA. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Keep up the fight. My mother always told me there is no such thing as can't and quitters never win and winners never quit. I will continue to try and spread the word. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I posted the link to this on Calguns. Seems most think it is too long of a long shot to get behind. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk