MauserCollector

Seems wrong place wrong time fell on deaf ears. I am glad the owner defended himself and made adjustments that HE saw as necessary and positive. The whole calling a place a ripoff because of what their prices are is ridiculous. You don't like it don't buy it. I don't buy shiny new firearms, but if I did I am going to take a few things into consideration. One of which in this State is compliance work. I've seen some expensive rifles listed for sale on this forum with absolutely horrendous work done to them. For instance if you buy a SCAR-17 for $3,000 and pay $20 to have a brake welded on and it looks like crap vs paying $3,300 for the same SCAR-17 and $100 to have the brake welded but it looks like it came out of the factory which is the better deal? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The local police should not be calling about anything unless it has the word conviction next to it and it hasn't been expunged. More NJ BS. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Incorrect because NJ defines machine gun as not requiring the pull of the trigger for each round. Since a binary trigger fires on the release it is not legal in NJ. Federal Law doesn't come into play because NJ Law clearly defines a machine gun. Not that I agree with the definition. However there is no clear definition of a stock, but since Federal Law says it is not a stock unless permanently mounted or strap removed, so it would be a defense. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I think I will stay away this weekend. I never Valet. I don't like people messing with my mirrors and seat, I don't like having to bring all my firearms out at once, and I certainly am not leaving them in my vehicle with a valet. Maybe middle of the night I will give it a shot. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Wrong Time, Wrong Place. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It wouldn't surprise me. Seems most State Bureaucracies one hand doesn't know what the other is doing. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I'm guessing one would have to dig into the Utah Statutes on CCW and Expungement to know for sure. Personally I have always felt if a state allows expungement and someone spends the time and money to have to done then it should be like it never happened as stated in the statutes. I have never had a conviction so I could always answer that as No. Arrests I also answered as No once expungement was done. I had records expunged when I applied to law schools. I only recall one school asking specifically about expunged arrests and to that I also answered No. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I know it is there, but do you know what the definition of expungement is in Utah? I know expungement in CA does not mean it never happened. There has been NJ Case Law that says even if applicant is asked about expunged records they can truthfully answer no because once expunged it never happened. Edit: Changed my mind looked it up I believe CCW is a Licensure Application https://bci.utah.gov/expungements/expungements-faq/ Once the Expungement is complete, do I need to acknowledge the arrest/charge on an employment or licensure application? Once the judge has issued the order and you have delivered all of the copies to the required agencies you may respond to any question pertaining to the expunged record “as if it never happened”. This is according to Utah state law.

If it didn't exist in NJ then how can it exist in Utah? If being truthful it should be answered. If following the letter of the law I don't believe it needs to be since a NJ expoungement means it never happened, unless of course unsealed by a judge. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ok so not being permanently attached to buffer tube and having strap on are necessary for it to not be a stock. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Of course it wouldn't be but the defense is NJ makes adjustable and folding STOCKS and evil feature. NJ doesn't clearly define stock but ATF clearly defines a brace as not being a stock. Being ATF is the top law enforcement agency in regards to Firearms I would consider their opinion to be correct. I all other dimensions apply. If AK has stock removed and shovel is mounted or shovel is used to make stock or there is no stock as long as minimum dimensions are met its legal Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Neither NJ or Federal define a rifle as having a stock. It is defined as being fired from the shoulder. Feds say brace isn't a stock. NJ law says evil feature is adjustable or folding stock. How can NJ sell something a stock the ATF says isn't a stock? To be guilty NJ would have to change the law. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Convictions yes but not arrests. However under NJ law you can answer no even if you did because an expoungement means it didn't happen. I never had a conviction or even PTI. Since mine were all false arrests and accusations I was able to answer no regardless. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

You shouldn't need papers from the state to exercise Constitutional Rights. Next is the state requiring papers to travel within it. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

This whole NJ way of thinking is why the firearms laws suck in this state. One should not need a FPID, FID, or any other B.S. NJ document to buy or rent a firearm. I bought my first handgun almost 30 years ago. Left SC DMV with my new SC Drivers License walked across the street and walked out with a handgun. Then later that week I bought my second. Went to a range to try out some other firearms all they needed to see was my money. That is how Free America and the Second Amendment works. Someone wants to kill themself they will and nothing anyone does can stop them. It is crap that ranges were forced into asking for NJ FPID and not allowing males to go alone. Likely forced on them by lawyers, insurance companies, and NJSP all working in tandem. For what safety? When you sacrifice liberty for security you deserve neither.

Sounds legal to me. It's not a stock so it can not be considered an evil feature. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You would think so, but like you said this is NJ. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Depends on if one was convicted. Adjudicated a juvenile delinquent is a fancy way of saying convicted. Possession of marijuana conviction would qualify. It sounds like OP received juvenile council, same as adult PTI. If he didn't get in trouble again it technically was not a conviction so he could truthfully answer No to the question, however it is much better to have everything expunged. Anyone that did an expoungement years ago needs to update the NJSP Juvenile Arrest Database. I was never convicted or adjudicated a juvenile delinquent, but I was falsely charged multiple times. Just last year this came up after numerous permits being issued without a problem. I just had to serve them with expoungement order and the arrests haven't come up again. Unfortunately for me at the time they had the arrest records, but not the court records so it delayed my permits. Luckily my mother saved a box and I was able to prove they were all false accusations that resulted in charges being dismissed or a verdict of not guilty. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If it was a deal, and I was looking for one, I would buy it. For $5k I would definitely buy it if it was mechanically fine. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Then he lists it online for sale, and gives title that can be traced back to him? Link is for a trailer not an RV. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Do you really believe DMV would re title a stolen vehicle and then the guy would list it for sale online? Seriously? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Would likely need a judge's order to release the information. Which should be possible because it would be pertinent to the suit and the state obviously knows who has them. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I'm guessing he means the make , model, and year. If I understand it is a name brand RV with with work done to it and titled as homemade. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Well the stolen part shouldn't be an issue if there is a VIN. Can also check carfax but it isn't 100%. That's where a mechanic is helpful. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That is not a bad idea and it would be a good suit for multiple individuals to file against multiple state politicians. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk