Update on our Media Person - He has been terminated!!! Good luck finding a job you leftist, Obama / Pelosi supporter.

 

I want to share how deeply entrenched the media is on all this. As I mentioned in a past, I submit a lot of security analysis / commentary on security matters. I contacted our CEO and media person about submitting a piece on this. I will clip and list as best I could my exchange with him and our CEO this morning.

 

- My original submission

 

Here are my observations and commentary coming from a professional security perspective.

1. Where was the security? .... snipped

2. Crowd Control, where was it? ...snipped

3. If you are elected, you are a target. ...snipped

4. EMS - snipped and blah, blah

Wojo (Yes I go by Wojo outside of forums)

1st response from our CEO

Good insights. Let’s make this week’s newsletter and run it on both sites. We can add links to some articles and use copy for the ToolKit. We should reference the 2 webinars February 9^th and 23^rd at 2 PM EST on Workplace violence.

 

PR Leftist MSM supporting tart

Can we ignore the fact a deranged kid can buy ammo at freakin Walmart?

 

My response to the media-tart

We can’t afford to let personal bias about influence what happened here.He could have killed her with a knife because of the lack of security at this event. Before laying judgment here, wait until my submission of an article. I know we are on opposites sides of the spectrum, but anyone who has studied assassinations will tell you that you can’t lock down an entire society or deny rights to 99.99% of the population at the expense of a few. Wojo.

 

Media-Tart response

I do have a bias against 9 year olds getting shot, yes. And it happens here far more than in European countries because of our lax gun laws. Is it really necessary to have deadly weapons and ammo available at the neighborhood Walmart? Haven’t seen that in the Bill of Rights.

 

CEO Response to above

He had no record. The line between personal information, confidentiality, personal freedom, and the rights of the public will always produce conflict. The story is tragic. It clearly shows we take our personal protection for granted.

 

My response

M, There was a lot of chatter before the holidays that AQ was looking to use pick-up trucks or other large vehicles to mow down innocent people in crowds such as shopping malls, schools, churches, political gatherings etc in a coordinated attack. Should we ban vehicles over an established weight? Box cutters took down four airliners, fertilizer and diesel killed scores in OK City, gas was used in Japan, propane tanks almost killed hundreds in Time Square, …

 

 

Tart Response without including the CEO

C’mon Scott, you know I’m too savvy for the standard NRA propaganda. He could’ve used a knife (kind of hard to imagine stabbing 12 people before being stopped), but didn’t; could have gotten the gun elsewhere, but didn’t, etc.. Always changing the subject is a very effective strategy. As is buying enough politicians and judges to get your way. The word “ban’’ never came from me. I’m a realist.

 

Simply asking why it’s necessary to make getting deadly weapons as easy as a beer or cigarettes? Why don’t we have a standard mental health screening? Why would even the most devout NRA nut want it to be this way? How many 9 year old girls have to die before we care?

 

I sent this to the CEO and our president who is a NRA Life Member and carries in his home state every where

I have remained silent for quite some time about M’s bias influencing his writings and watering down my submissions.Since I have been contributing to the newsletter, M continues to let his political and personal views cloud things. All too often he makes remarks to me that I find unprofessional for someone who should have the professional capacity to remain neutral for the benefit of Firestorm.

 

I have kept everyone of his responses and really think he needs to be spoken to, or better yet removed from his position if he cannot be professional. He has obviously lost his capacity

to remain neutral on security issues. Too many times when I have presented facts from credible resources, he has remarks or takes a political view on things. For the record, I am an Independent, but leans towards being a Libertarian or Constitutionalist. He is becoming a liability and I am beginning to have reservations about working with him moving forward. I would like to have a discussion on how we can address this matter. Wojo

 

Last submission from our CEO

Scott, M’s role will be changing. I will address. Jim

 

 

I feel good that I might have removed him from his position. I included several other emails of him ranting against my commentaries about US Security issues and most recently that Muslim Extremists are here, and have been coming in from our borders north and south, and they ain't here to contribute in a positive manner.

 

 

 

Did ya send him the link I posted on his way out the door ?

Did ya send him the link I posted on his way out the door ?

 

I thought about it, but elected not to go that route. I wanted to remain as detached and a cool as I could on the surface. Our corporate office is in Atlanta so I could not be there in person to piss in his coffee cup. But I might send an immature email saying, "naa-naa you socialist prick". But that would be something only someone from NJ would stoop so low to do...and I am just that kind of guy.

I wanna come work with you!!!!

It's good to see the good guy win one every now and then. Wojo congrats on getting more peace at work. It's amazing how someone takes a job in an industry they know they don't agree with. What was that guy thinking...best of luck for the future.