This guy is the Editor in Chief of Beatweek Magazine. The link shows a tweet he deleted, but was captured....

 

http://i.imgur.com/UD3rp.jpg

 

We have to make sure we don't say things like this *Cough* James Yeager, but it does prove that guns don't make you violent. Since this guy doesn't like them and he is threatening to shoot gun owners.

While not a direct threat, could the context of that not be taken as a suggestion for someone to do??

While not a direct threat, could the context of that not be taken as a suggestion for someone to do??

 

 

That's exactly how I interpreted it.

What are they going to shoot with? An outstretched index finger followed by cocking their thumb?

I hate dumb fux like that guy.

Can this be considered a threat to all off us? On the record for ccw permits?

What's his twitter handle. Id like to ask him directly about this.

Antis are anti-gun, so what are they going to shoot us with?.

Less 'anti-gun' and more 'hypocrite'.

Irony!

What are they going to shoot with? An outstretched index finger followed by cocking their thumb?

 

Hoplophobes are too cowardly to do it themselves, they always want someone to do it for them.

Antis are anti-gun, so what are they going to shoot us with?.

 

Barbara Graham,who gave a speech at the Million Mom March shot a man whom she wrongly believed to have killed her son...

Hoplophobes are too cowardly to do it themselves, they always want someone to do it for them.

 

They want to pass laws and have the Pension Protection Squads do it for them.

I'm ok with it. As soon as they pick up a gun they became a gun owners and they might re-evaluate their position. Or his brain will explode from the cognitive dissonance.

So much for guns = violence. What a dipshit.

They want to pass laws and have the Pension Protection Squads do it for them.

 

What's a Pension Protection Squad?

What's a Pension Protection Squad?

 

Groups of "The Only Ones" that will blindly follow unconstitutional orders in violation of their oath and at the expense of your rights so as to protect their own pensions.

 

 

What's a Pension Protection Squad?

 

He means guys like me

Groups of "The Only Ones" that will blindly follow unconstitutional orders in violation of their oath and at the expense of your rights so as to protect their own pensions.

 

He means guys like me

 

We do ourselves no favors crucifying the people who made this comment while not also crucifying James Yeager. Fair is fair.

I figured that what it meant.

 

Apparently he means me too then BLF...

 

I love the cute names. Like he just can't come out and say Cops.

 

ETA: Now comes the "I never said ALL Cops just the ones that are too chicken to stand up for their beliefs an the Constitution" along with "BLF and HE just stated that they will blindly follow orders and TAKE OUR GUNS!!!'

 

Laughable...

Edited January 14, 201313 yr by High Exposure

Yeah. Whatever..I take it for what it is. The same ones that like to talk a lot of shit when your In uniform because they know you can't just haul off and slap them like they need to be.

He means guys like me

 

And Me

We do ourselves no favors crucifying the people who made this comment while not also crucifying James Yeager. Fair is fair.

 

Aye, but people will do it regardless. On BOTH sides.

Aye, but people will do it regardless. On BOTH sides.

 

Not that it's anything new...a day after Newtown I was seeing posts saying crap like "All NRA members should be Shot" or "All NRA members' kids Should be shot' Stupid people say Stupid things.

He means guys like me

I figured that what it meant.

 

Apparently he means me too then BLF...

 

I love the cute names. Like he just can't come out and say Cops.

 

ETA: Now comes the "I never said ALL Cops just the ones that are too chicken to stand up for their beliefs an the Constitution" along with "BLF and HE just stated that they will blindly follow orders and TAKE OUR GUNS!!!'

 

Laughable...

Yeah. Whatever..I take it for what it is. The same ones that like to talk a lot of shit when your In uniform because they know you can't just haul off and slap them like they need to be.

And Me

 

I wasn't pointing fingers at anyone in particular, local, state or fed. Hey you will all have a choice to make, to either follow the orders of wannabe tyrants directing you to enforce their unconstitutional edicts upon the disobedient subjects or obey your oath to defend and protect the constitution of the United States. That simple choice is all yours to make. If you gentlemen are not Oath Takers kind of guys then so be it, if you think the Nuremberg Defense will get you anywhere if you decide to violate that oath then good luck with that, you will receive as much respect as you earn from the rest of us. I'm sure many of us will be well prepared and ready, anxiously awaiting your decisions. We will not be the one's making that "with us or against us" decision, you will be. Read what people are saying, many in this country that still get our history have just about had enough of this crap and they (the left) are seriously considering overreaching on their agenda. They will be the one's putting you guys in disharmony with the people, not us.

I honestly do not think was a direct threat against me or anyone else who is pro-gun; or anyone who carries a gun like the police.

 

...BUT...

 

What if I had said something like this about anti-gun people?

What if I had said that shooting ANYONE was a good idea or the right course of action?

 

I would hope that if I was the one saying something stupid like that that there would be some type of backlash because this really isn’t acceptable language in polite company. In fact in our community, specifically the recent case of James Yeager, many of us spoke out against this type of rhetoric.

 

Who will speak out against this man? We will of course, but who on his side, who on his political affiliation will decry his words? Which one of his friends or colleagues will denounce what he said?

Hypocrisy will be their undoing, if there is any justice left….

I wasn't pointing fingers at anyone in particular, local, state or fed. Hey you will all have a choice to make, to either follow the orders of wannabe tyrants directing you to enforce their unconstitutional edicts upon the disobedient subjects or obey your oath to defend and protect the constitution of the United States. That simple choice is all yours to make. If you gentlemen are not Oath Takers kind of guys then so be it, if you think the Nuremberg Defense will get you anywhere if you decide to violate that oath then good luck with that, you will receive as much respect as you earn from the rest of us. I'm sure many of us will be well prepared and ready, anxiously awaiting your decisions. We will not be the one's making that "with us or against us" decision, you will be. Read what people are saying, many in this country that still get our history have just about had enough of this crap and they (the left) are seriously considering overreaching on their agenda. They will be the one's putting you guys in disharmony with the people, not us.

What the hell are you talking about?

What the hell are you talking about?

 

he made one of his typical "All cops are JBT Scumbags" assinine comments and we made fun of him..now he's backpedalling.

he made one of his typical "All cops are JBT Scumbags" assinine comments and we made fun of him..now he's backpedalling.

 

Stop putting words in people's mouths. I did not say "All cops are JBT Scumbags" and your comments are the only asinine one's I have seen. I'm not backpedalling from shit. Your superiority complex is showing again. I merely made a point that these asshat politicians can only pass laws, they need tools, like you obviously, that seem to not take their oath seriously, in order to enforce them.