They probably never thought that saying it's not a flash hider could cause confusion in restrictive states.

This is the problem

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

I'm not sure why anyone would question why I wanted to see this in person. There's dozens of devices, parts and accessories designed to skirt the dumb laws and I was hoping this was one of them.... just look at the black acres tactical thread

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

I wouldn't buy anything that looks remotely like a flash supressor (this looks exactly like one, cause it is). This one isn't really even an argument. There are too many solid comps and brakes to skirt the law so close.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

my thoughts worth exactly what you paid for them:

 

1.  we can all look at that one picture and assume its not nj legal 

2.  you stated you thought it might be nj illegal and went forward anyway

 

did you ask any questions before ordering?   did you check their return policy?   if not, i really can't fault them.  if we keep pushing the "is this a compensator, is this a flash hider" thing with manufacturers, they will just start selling and labeling muzzle devices.

 

the problem is with NJ not defining flash hiders, not with the manufacturers labeling flash hiders something else.  hell, noveske calls their muzzle device a flaming pig, and video shows a huge fireball out the front usually.  nobody in NJ would install that as a compensator even though we all know its functionally not a flash hider by even a slight amount.

There is so much fail here. It is legal. Only depends on what you put it on. Cmon guys, wtf?

There is so much fail here. It is legal. Only depends on what you put it on. Cmon guys, wtf?

What are you talking about? This has been stated very early on in this thread. Given the statements by the op it has been assumed that he was using it on an ar15.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

There is so much fail here. It is legal. Only depends on what you put it on. Cmon guys, wtf?

 

Nowhere in this thread does it say a flash hider is illegal in and of itself.

 

It is said that it is an inappropriate choice for an AR since it adds a 3rd "evil" feature, making the rifle an "assault rifle" and thereby prohibited.

 

I don't see the fail you see....

Checko and BBQ

What's the point? Flash hider here, ok. Flash hider there not ok.

Cmon!

So many " paint by the numbers"

Why do we have these numbers?

 

Can't I just paint?

Properties of titanium increase the flash? Ask to speak with her supervisor on grounds that she is clueless.

It's a possibility. One of the mechanisms of flash hiders is converting energy into vibration. Take the energy out of the gas, less heat, thus less flash.

 

Also conduction is involved.

 

Titanium may vibrate less, and they clearly didn't make the heat sink like ridges inside as deep as with a steel fh.

 

However, you need a baffle it a bore tight seal to make compy things happen.

 

Looks like a bright shiny turd.

So many " paint by the numbers"

Why do we have these numbers?

 

Can't I just paint?

No one is arguing the validity if the laws here. They are what they are. Play by the rules or dont, that is a personal decision. OP clearly wants to toe the line, yet not cross it.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Sorry for the rant. I'm just very frustrated with how stupid/ ineffective these laws are.

Preaching to the choir man.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

I know, I know....