bbk

If we move it to Wed, I won't be avail until after 8 or so. Should be fine otherwise, and I wouldn't mind showing up late if need be.

For me it boils down to INFOSEC, like many of you. I'm not ashamed of my passion for firearms, but I'm specific about who I share the information with. Also, in my experience, my former unit specifically told us to not display anything that portrayed our affiliation with the military or firearms because there had been a rash of break-ins of homes and personally owned vehicles that targeted military personnel. Of course this was in a different state, different time, different people, but I hold the same beliefs now because I know it's not just a hypothetical, but a reality. And my last reason why I'm not super-vocal is because I compartmentalize most every aspect of my life. I separate school from work from hobbies, etc-- and on very rare occasions I might overlap, but otherwise it's just how I organize (and insulate) myself.

Welcome!

Boo

Ah, so, that's what happened to Wil WIllis. I was curious where he had gone after the show Special Ops Mission went quiet (if you have Netflix, all episodes are streaming). Seems like an interesting show. Nice production value, hopefully they'll be able to keep it fresh.

As an American and Korean, this whole thing is twisted personally. I, having been old enough to comprehend what occurred on 9/11 and it being a main reason of why I enlisted and was involved with GWOT for a number of years, feel levels of tension and anxiety over the Dutch firm and the Korean land owners that are letting this happen. Of course I take offense to anything that doesn't paint anything related to 9/11 in a somber light, but... Yes, I'll be the first to say that, as somebody who respects the myriad of cultures that exist and have existed and have dedicated my life to this notion, my negative perspectives are based in enthnocentrism. While it would be easy to say that other cultures are wrong because they do not think the way my culture does is easy and simple, and reserved for those who are simple. Not that there is anything wrong with this perspective, as it has helped build nations and civilizations, including our own (and arguably better ones). However, in the consideration of the ongoing cultural evolution that swirls around us and the other 6.5 billion people in the world, our thoughts hardly are concerning. And where it does become a negative is when we, as a nation, alienate most other nations while also trying to manipulate them to our advantage... essentially trying to have your cake and eat it. So, we isolate and perish, or we expand and evolve. And while both, at least according to history, reach the same end [end of a civilization, or the "passing of the torch" so to speak] I would rather, as I apply to my personal life, be an active participant in reaching the end... meaning, I would rather not become a crabby, useless individual who rants about the problems in life without ever considering a solution. Having a hand in my own fate, while arguably pointless, seems more attractive. So, it goes back to the original topic. As Americans, should we take offense? I would hope so. Not as a patriots per se, but as citizens who come together over a terrible national tragedy. However, to not maintain being active participants, and so to say involved in global affairs that are advantageous to America, would essentially not just disrespect the lives lost on 9/11 and since-- but the previous 225+ years. And, honestly, this whole incident underscores what I have deduced is a large slice of the problem with Americans; and that is that Americans are short-sighted. Maybe it's the lack of history, or that we are a burgeoning young empire (probably both); but it is an issue that I think will be partially responsible for our inevitable "passing of the torch."

Ray, what are you talking about? If you honestly don't have anything to contribute, don't. The topic had never deviated until you made your post; so, stop trolling. And yea, I agree, most likely a magazine issue. Also notice that he did the original "mag-pul" with his magazines. Not that this is even a top 5 reason of why his magazines might be messed up, but it can be indicative of other mechanical issues.

Using the charging handle technique is fine, but he was riding the charging handle back into position instead of letting the mechanical motion ensure that the bolt was in full battery-- or at least that's how I saw it too. Seems like a major training scar if this is what he was doing, which is of course operator error. Edited for clarification: For those not familiar with charging handles and ARs, the above is the same concept of riding the slide of a pistol forward instead of allowing the mechanical action to ensure that the pistol is in battery if the individual opts to use the power-stroke method (instead of hitting the slide release). The bolt release functions the same as the slide release, and using the charging handle method is the same idea as power-stroking (compared to slapping the bolt release). This method is quite popular, but can be a detriment if a person doesn't practice it properly (hence training scar).

Have two 30+ pg papers due, one today, one a week from now. Three exams, 2 next Monday, 1 next Tuesday. Knocked out the papers two weekends ago, and already systematically broke down my studying time for the upcoming exams. My only concern is getting through the holidays to Jan so I can get to my winterland escape in CO!

I don't think parking will be too bad. Exams will be ongoing till the 23rd (Friday), but most students should be done by Wednesday-- and that place, as most could surmise, is a ghost town during the holidays. If you can't find a spot on Easton, try Somerset by the campus which runs perpendicular and is only two blocks or so away (Somerset by the residential I think is permitted). Could always park in the lot off Union, even though it's student parking-- they usually don't care after 6PM anyway.

This is great stuff, congratulations, Anastasia

USA 2004-08. BCT at Ft. Jackson, AIT at Ft. Huachuca, AZ Unit, location, and mission I won't disclose. Great memories though working in the IC in a joint-service atmosphere, and when I forget about all the BS that was involved, I miss it.

Gang-bangers? It was a mob, which is far from gang-bangers. That's akin to going to a village in Afghanistan in pursuit of suspected insurgents, and laying down fire on the general population (which, yes, is wrong). With that said, I absolutely support the protection of the first responders and innocent civilians involved, however discretion must always be applied-- and it's not a matter of being PC, but situational awareness. As it has already been pointed out, by firing into a crowd, that would probably escalate the situation exponentially. Sure, that mob might have dispersed, but, as history shows, raised tensions would most likely result in protests that could turn violent not in just the local area-- but nationally, maybe even world-wide (given the power of globalized communication. It could be argued that this is "hindsight," but I would disagree wholeheartedly as I consider this situational awareness-- having the foresight to realize what one's actions could cause, and how those consequences effect not just the individual, but the community. The NYPD and FDNY did a commendable job in dis-escalating this situation.

My understanding is that non-factory magazines cannot be used unless the rifle is 922r compliant. And seeing how 922r compliance is met by going through a series of conversions (to include the actual conversion process, which I'm already versed on, as well as replacing with other US-made parts), the assumption is to not go halfway with a project-- but to complete it [and, in the process, make the Saiga more of it's traditional build, and less of the 'Sporter' imported version]. Of course, if my information is completely wrong... well, I'd be happy, ha, as I wouldn't have to necessarily restrict myself.

I'm about to become a Saiga owner myself, and am considering the conversion process (mostly because I want to have access to magazines larger than 10 rounds... that are also actually in-stock anywhere). I'll have one in .223 though, so, I already have that which the purists will hold against me... so I might as well pursue the dream of making it the most unholy AK-variant of AK-variants But to make this not a troll-post, I'm excited to be adding a Saiga to the mix. Definitely looking forward to learning a new system, and improving upon my rifle marksmanship. When it comes to the types of AK-variants out there, can't go wrong with a Saiga (or so I've heard).

So crazy that I was there maybe three or four days before they uprooted everything-- things looked business as usual. With that said, sounds like the changes are to the benefit for everyone, so, I can't say I mind. Now, if we could do something about making it feel safer...

That's really nice, DA. I had the same exact idea in mind for my next AR build, down to the A1 stock.

Hahaha, that guy is great^, almost makes the show worthwhile to sit through

Hey welcome aboard. I lived in Lawrence township many, many years ago.

As evident by the fact that I actually took the time to write out something that I thought I had buried into the recesses of my mind, I could use some excitement in the form of a good reporting. ETA: ETA pt. 2: Ray's my hombre. Speaking of, Ray, you haven't texted me in awhile, is your phone broken?

Haha, history of the world. "I don't get it, therefore I shall kill it with fire!"

Yea, I didn't want to say it early on, but you always switch. Since you're always shown a door that would garner no prize, it is easy to assume that there is then a 50% probability that either the door you picked or the other one has the prize. However, since the prize is only behind 1 of 3 doors to began with, there is only a 33% probability you picked the door that had the prize to began with. Since they show you said door without the prize, that means by switching, you have a 66% of switching to the door with the correct prize compared to 33% of having picked the correct door originally... and hence you have a double chance of being correct by switching. This whole problem is widely known as the Monty Hall problem:

Ha, I learned the actual math behind this classic game show question in a course I'm taking this semester actually.

I don't have this specific issue, as I'm right handed and right-eye dominant, but I came to realize that the weakest part of my shooting (at least with rifles) was shooting from my "support" side. So, to remedy, whenever I am at the range with my rifles, I only shoot lefty because it's only through practice that I'll get any better. It's a bit awkward, but it becomes fairly second-nature after some time. As for brass hitting you in the face if you shoot lefty with a right-handed model, it's often not the case with most firearms.

Devices have their use, if thought out beforehand. If a person opts to fire a round per minute, off rest, then it makes sense to not put a brake on the end. If someone's uses are driven towards control and follow up shots, brakes can be a huge help. I won't get into flash hiders because that's a moot point in NJ. I personally also like muzzle devices because it provides an extra layer of protection for the end of my muzzle. It's a very small chance of anything actually occurring if I knock said barrel into something, but it's also peace of mind. If/when I invest in my 18'' semi-precision upper, I probably won't care if the barrel ends up crowned. However, to simply negate the concept due to one-track thinking doesn't seem too logical.