bbk

Well, from my experience, dealing with a LOP is just a matter of blading your stance. So, for example vjf, your girlfriend could blade more and practically hold the rifle standing sideways if the stock is too long for her. In the same respect, since my stock has such a short LOP, I shoot squared up. I agree, it does suck that we can't just have telescoping stocks because it would get rid of the hassle... but, until things change, might as well evolve ourselves

Should have attended their 'Range Day' just held this past weekend...

Happy bday, bud

Yea, that's true. I'm not a big proponent for tape switches, but its better then nothing. I also wasn't sure, but do TLR-1's need some sort of extra attachment to use the tape switch? That was the impression I got when I checked it out on the company's site.

Thanks!

I'll be bringing a friend as well (which I'm pretty sure I noted somewhere previously in this beastly thread). Hopefully the weather will be better this time around, though, I could imagine it'll be chilly regardless (esp. at that time of the day). Nothing a coffee can't fix though.

TLR-1's on ARs is all the rage right now (well, at least a growing trend). Its compact, light weight, more then enough light, and easy to manipulate with practice (and if you have the rail-space for it).

That's from: http://www.adcofirearms.com/shopservices/ Regarding specifics (like what type of muzzle devices they might have available in shop, etc), the contact email at the bottom of the above link is probably the most direct line of contact-- and response time is decent. Something to remember though is that not all NJ-compliant muzzle devices are long enough when permanently attached to a 14.5'' upper to make the rifle non-NFA. If you've already sorted that out, then disregard.

My limited experience with a bullpup-designed rifle definitely had a bit more kick than a front-loading rifle (or to note an M16... not really noticeable compared to an M4). I've also read since that bullpups may kick a bit harder because the design may be responsible for the increase in felt-recoil (I read this after I had experienced one first-hand). I haven't shot a .308 bullpup, and I can't vouch for that-- just a theory based on those two caveats.

- If you were to have it shipped to NJ, probably be best to ship it straight to whomever would be pinning it (and ship whichever muzzle device to them as well). I'm not legal-eagle, but I wouldn't want an NFA item (14.5'') in my personal possession (place of residence). - Or you could have the upper shipped to some place out of state (like ADCO) from where ever you're buying from, let them do the work, and then have them ship it to you (I've taken this route before, and it wasn't a hassle at all). Long story short, as I mentioned prior, I wouldn't personally have a 14.5'' barrel in my possession (esp if I had other lowers/rifles sitting around). I don't think the black helis would come, but I wouldn't want to take that chance either (considering the alternatives are relatively not a hassle to deal with). If you don't mind me asking, where are you ordering from? I only ask because I know some manufacturers will do the work for you (even if its not necessarily listed on their site). Also, BCM currently is shipping 14.5'' mid length uppers that have their muzzle devices permanently attached-- though their options are limited for what kind of muzzle device (though the NJ-legal PWS FSC556 is one of those). I emailed asking if they did any type of custom work, and they don't... they do bulk orders, and is the reason why they don't deviate from that. Its the route I'll be going personally. As for the lengths of the buttstock, gosh, I really couldn't find exact measurements anywhere. I do know that the A1 is 5/8'' shorter then the A2 ... and I believe an A2 is around 13'' or so. I'm sorry I don't have an exact length.

I personally like the bullpup design, and the fact that brass goes out the front (opposed to the side). The compactness while maintaining a longer barrel (18'' barrel, 26-27'' overall? Very nice) is a huge plus. My only beef is that the sight radius is so darn short for irons, and that's an issue with the bullpup design as a whole. Though, in the modern era, I guess it doesn't really matter seeing how most everyone utilizes some type of optic. I also do feel that .308 would be a bit painful coming out of a bullpup rifle. And, more of an issue, would be harder to keep a consistent position/sight picture. If it came in 5.56/.223, I think it would be a better choice. Which really boils down the argument to the fact that I'm personally waiting for the Tavor TAR-21 (stupid CD closing )

Unless the number has changed for Range 14: 609-562-4676

I've heard something about them offering the aluminum receiver (the Remington/MIL version), but I'm sure that's just internet rumor. Still, you're right, Shane. What really gets under my skin is that the issues I've heard of are purely quality control issues, not even so much hardware. I've heard of bolts not being completely fastened, and those same bolts not having any type of redundant measures (like Loctite). And in another situation, Bushmaster QC people told a user who was having issues explicitly to never use 5.56 because the rifle was never designed for it. Whether it can or cannot run 5.56 is another argument. The fact that Bushmaster would go out of their way to say it and/or make a product, that was targeted to a pretty specific market, and knowingly screw said market is appalling... and then, of course, price the rifle for 2500+ (MSRP)?! I mean, lets be honest, the rifle isn't priced over 2K because its the best thing since sliced bread. If I wanted to overpay for something no where near its value, I would just buy a George Foreman Grill (and even then, those things can be useful). A realistic price would be around 1200, and most of that would be because of the barrel changing feature. If Remington released the actual hard-use version, sure, I could understand a $2000 price tag... but for what BM is offering? Its lunacy. ETA: Bushmaster (civilian version): http://www.bushmaster.com/acr/ Remington (military/LEO version): http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/RemingtonMilitary/Firearms/Carbines/ACR.aspx A lot of people are confused about why two different manufacturers (and then throw Magpul into the mix) are producing the ACR-- and its because Bushmaster is handling the civilian sales/versions, while Remington is handling the military/LEO sales (or that's what it boils down too).

Wow, glad I didn't invest in one yet (plus the other issues I've heard about). Its too bad Remington won't really be offering their iteration any time in the presented future.

Oh, haha, I thought you were asking me of my sources. Yea, National Guard is what I was referring too, my fault for not recognizing that.

Nope. LEOs in certain positions.

I've heard from an inside source that the state is considering putting the NG on patrol in the major cities that are cutting back on police (Newark, Atlantic City, Camden to name a few). Considering the NG is not strapped by Posse Comitatus and other restrictions-- plus they're responsibility is to/for the state... and they don't get paid over time... I guess the state government could pull it off. I know in NYC they have Army units that help supplement the law enforcement entities, as well as providing supplemental help regarding emergency services (namely medics). Of course I don't know to what extent the NG's role would be in a policing action in NJ cities, but its an interesting proposition. I personally don't think its a good idea (as the military is not a policing force, bottom line), but it could help relieve some stress on the current situation. For the record, my post is a tinfoil-free.

And I feel gun naked around you!

That's a really good price actually. I've heard only good things come from Spikes as well... and its a middy too! Nice selection, very nice. Of course you'll need to have it neutered (), but its great that Spikes is so accommodating for us oppressed and will do everything for you in-house.

The technique is called "strobing": http://www.campussaf...Flashlight.aspx We've talked about this before, but its good to bring it back. The correct way of using a light (hand held or weapon light) is to NOT walk around with it on. It gives away your position and once a person knows what direction you're going in (its fairly obvious within the first few seconds), then you're at the mercy of your assailant. Instead you walk in a non-circuitous route, and only momentarily flash the room (or the floor of the room if you know it has white walls and you're using a high lumens light). The advantage, and its probably in that article, is that a strobing light causes the Bucha Effect (can be highly disorienting). The thing though is people have to be careful with the setting, and know how and when to use a strobing light vs. the strobing technique. ETA: If you have a flash light, look directly into it (if its like 200+ lumens, don't do this, ha), and turn it on for a moment (or do it in a mirror if its already mounted!). And then flash it down an empty, dark hallway. You'll see the difference. The thing though is that you have to be aware of your surroundings, and if there are white walls or reflective surfaces (like a mirror), you of course want to be weary of that as it can cause flash blindness with you as well. With a high lumens light, I've always been use to flashing the ground instead (if I'm inside that is).

I somehow cut my commute from 25 minutes to 10, definently an anomaly

I'll save you the trouble! The part I circled in red is the bungee type stuff (you're right, SKD fails to mention it in their description of the product, ha). It wraps around every pouch, with the two outer pouches having a retention strap as well (demonstrated in the picture). Picture courtesy of SKD Tac, with my obnoxious circling.

A single mag is loose, true. But unless I'm doing combat rolls, repeatedly, because they seat at such an angle, the pockets are deep enough, and each pouch has a bungee-type retention (that makes it difficult enough to fit two mags), so I've never had much issue with them. Remember that I don't use that back strap, so, while the movement of the rig is limited when traveling horizontally, if I am in an awkward position, the top of the rig tends to bow in-wards, while the bottom is affected by gravity (I know its weird to explain-- but essentially the rig pivots on my body). Maybe if I were to fall sideways (where the rig wouldn't be able to pivot as much, there might be some issues there (if I fell hard enough). I do want to maybe try out some velcro inside and on my mags or wrap rubber bands around the mags though to see how well it would retain. I'm thinking the rubber bands could be a quick/cheap fix, and not wear down as quickly as velcro (I never cared much for looks).

I run: http://www.skdtac.co...D_p/eag.567.htm (in OD), you saw it briefly last time, Pete. I've only added an IFAK on the right side, with a knife and Gerber on the other. If I ever get around to it, I want to add a GP (general pouch) on the left hand side because the admin pouch is way too small (it sits between the body and rig... big enough for a few maps, pens, but not for compasses or extra lights/batteries). Regarding the rig though, I like how it can sit high or low. I run it in the middle because if its too high, the IFAK gets in the way, and then it drags around and becomes uneven (a big soup sandwich). The shoulder straps run in an X, and it would be nice if Eagle made a part for the back (like TT or Esstac) big enough to place a MOLLE pack or hydration carrier. Because of the X configuration, I don't have to utilize that annoying back strap-- and it takes me a second to throw it on. But because its an X strap, probably be best to run a collared shirt-- otherwise its chafe city. The straps themselves though are comfortable, and don't really get in the way (all the buckles are in the back, so, nothing really messes with stock placement). I did put foam in the actual pouches so my 15/20 mags sit a bit higher, but have no issues with them falling out. I do find it a bit awkward to reach across my body though to grab magazines, but that's expected. I'll try to put up a picture later (you all know how I am with pictures...)

Nice, thanks for sharing. You could have been like every other teenage girl and taken self-pictures using the bathroom mirror with the flash messing with 40% of the shot. I would've gotten a kick out of it at least But seriously, I think maybe you don't like chest rigs is because you're running Fast Mags on them? I know the motion to use those things is a bit erratic. I have seen them used on chest rigs, but usually off on the side, or, if on the front of the body, upside down.