DevsAdvocate

Stop asking for permission for these things. Every. Damned. Time. You people gotta run on home to the AG and ask "mother may I" and they turn around and say "no". Just buy it, own it, shoot it... oh, and shut up about it. Regardless, this rifle doesn't really score high marks from what I've read.

What kind of match is it? Ontelaunee is where I shoot.

Not only that... it also has no pistol grip.

Regardless, I'm not here to debate the merits of the SERPA... I want to train, and if instructors are not allowing it in their classes, then I'll use something that is allowed.

It doesn't have a pistol grip, it's fine.

Thanks for the pointers guys, I'll look into the suggestions and watch reviews. Hopefully the next holster I pick won't get banned from classes... :-P

Anyone have firsthand use of these? G-Code's look nice. Same with Bladtechs. Safarilands are pricey... I'm not even sure I want retention crap anymore, and would rather just use a Kydex or something.

I run 2 belt rigs, one a battle belt with MOLLE which can carry pistol mags and rifle mags, and a lighter 1.5" belt just for pistol. However, they both run SERPAs. Yeaaaah, there's a bunch of bitching and moaning on the internet about it (annoying if you ask me), but it's gotten to the point where training classes won't allow them, which means I get to toss out things which I spent good money on and replace them. Here's the deal though: I like blackhawks system of being able to take a holster off one belt and put it on another using this (http://www.blackhawk.com/product/SERPA-Quick-Disconnect-Kit-2-Female1-Male,1239,82.htm) and this ( Question 1: what are the thoughts on this holster? http://www.blackhawk.com/product/Sportster-Standard-CQC-Concealment-Holster,1805,32.htm Question 2: does anyone make a holster system which should work with these Blackhawk accessories? Like Safariland (expensive)? Or Uncle Mikes? Thanks!

Pffft. So when can every NJ gun owner admit that they all keep high-cap mags and folding stocks that were bought in PA in a bid to appear defiant? C'mon guys, we all know it.

Go for it... just another case to bring to the SCOTUS. I don't see how this is allowable following Heller or McDonald.

That's true.

Makes sense. I always found these restrictions weird though. Aren't some muzzleloaders just as powerful as center-fire rifles? Like, if you aim stupidly, they can fly for a good distance?

In PA and NY, you can go out and hunt with a centerfire rifle, but in NJ you can't. Has it always been this way? When did the change happen? Usually, people like to cite that we're too densely populated in the State to use these rifles because the bullet travels too far (bullshit). But if you're shooting from a stand and have a proper backstop (basic hunting/shooting rules), then it shouldn't be a problem. So what's the story? Will they ever allow center-fire hunting?

Anyone try or have one of these in .308? Bonus legal question: If I don't own an AR-10 rifle or equivalent, can I use PMAG LR20s with it?

Okay St. Thomas... but I'm not quite sure I understand your position...? Also, isn't photo evidence going to be a revelation of people's personal info? I mean, what level of evidence do you require?

Do we now? Here's the deal, if we don't apply and don't get rejected, then we're doing the State a favor. If we do apply and get rejected, we reduce the State's success rate which is better for us in the courts. My question back to you again is: what do you have to lose by trying? I'm sure Frank and others have applied, mine is good to go and I'll put it in when I have a chance.

My big question to you is: what do you have to lose by trying? Let's say you apply, then get rejected. It's not like you've become a prohibited person and cannot buy a gun. At the very most, you just put in "Rejected for License to Carry due to lack of justifiable need" on line 27 of the application for an FPID/PPP. There is no reason to reject you for that.

I wonder... if I apply, how do I verify that I've done so? Do I have to wait until I'm rejected and get a letter stating so to prove my participation? Because that can be months from now...

Why isn't Glock making a 9mm slim stack?? C'mon!

This isn't a zero sum game dude. We can multi-task. The reason CCW is chosen is that is the most practical application of the RKBA. We have the RK, now we need the BA. The other details can get hashed out later.

.380? That would be dumb. Why not a 9mm? It would appear they would want to compete with the Nano, the Shield, the Ruger 9mm LCP, and the compact XD. Honestly, you're not saving much space going to a .380 from a 9mm.

It's not illegal, just buy one and enjoy it. No one is gonna prosecute you over something like this. Shit, we all own AR-15s, and those are banned by name. Same with AKs.

I dunno. Just don't shoot it in NJ is my IANAL response.

No real ouchies... but I definitely learned to keep my thumb out of the way of my SCAR's charging handle recently...

I too would be interested. I just need a slug gun.