JackDaWack

I'll have to ride my cbr down next year, i had no idea about this.

If you bought them specifically for Peter, Paul and Mary upon their request with the sole intent on buying the rifles for them, then yes, there is an issue. Do what makes you feel comfortable, but in no way are you bound by the law to keep the rifle.

Once again, nothing but speculation... You don't enforce a definition, you enforce a law. THERE IS NO STRAW PURCHASE LAW, for the love of god prove me wrong or move on. If i buy a gun today, with the intent of selling it tomorrow for a premium to a legal gun owner, I AM STILL THE BUYER of said firearm today and i am buying it on behalf of myself, i am not lying on form 4473. The reason you sell a firearm is completely irrelevant. There is no law saying why or when you can sell a firearm or at what price. The only thing that matters is that WHEN you buy the firearm, IT IS FOR YOU. PER FORM 4473 Support your opinion please. IF you do buy and sell firearms enough at what point they consider it a business you will be held to the standards of an FFL... that is what i am unsure about. If i buy a firearm today, say a collection piece with the intent on it being an investment to sell at a later date(never shoot it use it), even 15-20 years from today, its no different then flipping a "piece" overnight on gunbroker, the only difference is long term vs short term investment. If your going to buy and sell it can only be beneficial to have an FFL, which why people dedicated to it will have some form of license. But if you bought an AR off the shelf when SHTF, sold it with that intent to a legal gun owner, i don't see what law was broken... [18 U.S.C. 922(a) and 923(a)(1), 27 CFR 478.41©(d)] Q: What does “engaged in the business” mean? The term “engaged in the business,” as applicable to a firearms dealer, is defined as a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms.

at what point you are considered a dealer I do not know. But what would be falsified on 4473? Also are straw purchases illegal? And what is the law on them? Other then for 4473 question are you the buyer of the gun?

no where in what u posted did it say otherwise. I can buy a ksg today and be with in the law to sell it tomorrow at a higher price with the intent on doing so. No laws have been broken. Instead of telling people there wrong lets starting citing law and not some ATF opinion

So much fail in here already. Hey guys guess what. . There are no laws against straw purchases. Just illegal transfers. And for it to be a straw purchase u must buy it on behalf of another person, as in they must ask and give u the money before hand.

I still have all my cars and the medals from participating 15 years ago.

Man, if my PD did this, or anything that stood up for the residents, they would be getting one hell of a donation every year.

If your denial is overturned then you were not actually denied. Not a lawyer but take that for what it is.

Yeah and then Hollywood gets money from the government. Because they need money or something.

I think we need to get rid of the manufacturing ban but keep the tax stamps. Not going to bother commenting on nj's position.

We should call for regulations on the 1a. Freedom of press must back there claims and include factual evidence.

Tart

I'm just busting balls....

This. modify the bolt catch to catch every time. No longer semi-auto. probably some serious wear and tear tho.

Huh? having an adjustable gas block and putting a hex key in the gas port are 2 completely different things!

port

Sort

I feel like the net result would be a hospital trip the ER with a hex key lodged in your face.

Happy new year ladies and gents!

Accountability, that's what schools need. With people willing to throw others under the bus, and the general public's knee jerk reaction.. it's currently an extremely flawed system.

Schools are politics... they are not the free market.... they are the government.. it's a legitimate question.

You have to understand the political aspect that takes place on a board of ED and within administration. How hard would it be for a student to lie about something and have a teacher fired and the situation swept under the rug? How difficult is it to stop the board for pink slipping a teacher so there niece could be hired next year? Want to fire the 20yr experienced teachers because they cost more? The board is elected they are no different then any other political aspect... these things already happen to good teachers.. No one is claiming non-union privatized schools are worse, but understand i went to catholic school my entire life and witnessed teachers fired for opinionated matters, and get paid a substantial amount less.

How's that working out for us, politically speaking?