JackDaWack

"In total, the CDC estimates that up to 42.9 million people got sick during the 2018-2019 flu season, 647,000 people were hospitalized and 61,200 died." Decreasing the transmittance of the virus overall could have serious benefits, for both medical facilities and people. If you work in a hospital it is a mandatory vaccine.

Regardless of the cost saving to medical coverage that vaccines provide... you still haven't answered why any of these people even need it. They openly admit they dont believe in modern medicine... or that even the lowest risks arent worth it... If they get injured or sick, they should accept it as God's will... and since everything medical related has risks, almost everything Carries a greater risk than vaccines... so another point to consider. The US had outbreaks... because people still arent vaccinated here... Your worried about the cost of schooling... Didnt all the people who showed up to oppose this in NJ send ALL of their kids to private schools already? Your arguments dont make any sense.

I understand the argument of personal freedoms and choice. But what happened to my rights begin where yours end? Do we really want petri dishes of viral content spreading disease in our public places? Even people who are vaccinated may not be fully protected. Since most are effective enough but not 100% we really depend on as many people being vaccinated. Most older people need to get boosters, or better more effective updated vaccines to continue being protected.

We could eradicate most of the poverty in this country if we stop enabling people to stay home on government assistance... Just like we could erradicate viruses we have vaccines for if people werent enabled to skip them. In which cases there would be no need to even vaccinate people.

Only problem is the price tag... but shoot them an email and see what they say? I'd buy one.

The most infuriating part is that if everyone just got vaccinated, a lot of these viruses actually dissapear over generations, with no way to spread... Which means in the future, NO ONE would need to be vaccinated. If these people want to claim religious exemption, then they should sign a waiver, no medical treatments at all, ever... for anything. Funny how this group in NJ with the measels... they were/are all committing Medicaid fraud.... for what? They dont believe in modern medicine?

Why should the unvaccinated get all the benefits of being vaccinated? Those numbers are soo small because a majority of people suck up any risks for the benefits. Anti-vaxxers are no better then the others leaching off the public. If everyone chose not to vaccinate.... all these idoits would be running to get their kids vaccinated when all these diseases make massive comebacks due to the massive increase in population densities

Should people who cant take care of themselves... on public assistance have kids?

Do you think people should have to disclose if they have a communicable disease with others they come in contact with?

While I agree, but the state constitution does recognize a FAPE. Free appropriate public education. So maybe they can segregate the unvaccinated kids... why should they get the herd immunity if they wont contribute? I saw many challenges to this law, it would have been tied up on court for years.

There is a very small number of people that have adverse health effects for everything medically treatable. Would you not try and have a surgery performed if you knew there was a .0001% chance you would die from it? I'll say that while I didnt watch the YouTube video, it's just about the last place I would start any research on a medical topic.. A good place to start would be medical journals. Any health decision should come from a logical and informed place.. just like most any other decisions in life that are important.

This is about what the law says, not "what ifs". The VFG establishes a design for two handed shooting. A folding VFG establishes a design for both one and two handed. I have NO IDEA, how you can sit here and claim a folding and non folding VFG are substantially identical... would you say folding and non folding stocks identical?

I would just avoid doing to an already existing rifle. But other wise an "other firearm" has no barrel length restrictions. Have at it. IMO

So a gun designed to be shot with one hand? And not shouldered.. That's NJ's definition of a pistol.

If you wanted to build one from a receiver then go for it. It cant be anywhere near rifle or pistol classification.

Yea there's much grey area here.

Just gonna leave this here... for those who criticized.. https://www.njherald.com/news/20191215/freeholders-asked-to-declare-sussex--second-amendment-sanctuary

I had no idea they were part of xtreme bullets..

How can I possibly remember all those letters and numbers? Password would probably be easier to remember.

I recall that, but then youre left with US based products, and there is very little options there.

These people were using default passwords and usernames.. Not that you cant get hacked otherwise, but using these examples is not really being genuine to the "flaw" in using them. Realistically, the werent even hacking anything... they just tried default passwords and gained access to the system via the online software. The internet has never been kind to stupid people.

I just ordered some sniper grey cerakote. I was thinking of doing a black/grey theme for my m9a1

Every handgun present in NY has to be registered

Is it substantially identical to a VFG they ok'ed through ATF official opinion? No. They already said no to AVG's... i cant possibly see this being ok then.

Wouldnt they have to walk up to the camera to cover it?