Soju

Does Pine make good stocks? I always thought pine was a softer wood and wouldn't be that good for a rifle stock. I guess I was thinking something like walnut would make a much better stock.

You should probably tell your cousin's girlfriend to tell her sister that her husband is a douchebag and needs to stop spreading rumors.

I was watching his video shooting a 700, and was thinking, he would probably be better off taking the scope off and just looking down over the top of the barrel! What an excellent shot he is. I'm surprised when he misses. I also like his serious way of sarcasm. Good stuff.

http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/49660-new-video-destroys-myth-about-large-capacity-magazines/page__fromsearch__1

They don't have any problem on their hands. When is the last time a cop violating someones rights got held accountable for it? THEY don't pay even with there is a successful lawsuit over it. So they don't care. Worst case for them, is all charges are dropped and he wins a multi-million dollar lawsuit...at the taxpayers expense. Best case, he is convicted criminally. In any case, there are no repercussions for the police. And that is why they generally don't care and just make arrests sans reason anyways. It is easier and cost them nothing, though can cost you everything.

Guys guys guys. Those in favor of magazine limitations either 1. Don't care about facts. 2. KNOW that it has no practical benefit whatsoever. They simply want to limit our rights. You ban x capacity magazines...then you ban ownership of x number of magazine/guns...then you ban x type of guns...then you ban all guns. Do you really think that they just want to limit magazine capacity? Hell no. They want to limit a lot more than that, but they think they can do this right NOW, so that is what they are doing. Give them an inch, and they will take a mile. To us, this is a mile. To them, this is just the inch.

How many people on this forum own either a handgun, and AR, or any other scary looking rifle? Imagine just being at home with one, or shooting one at the range, or shooting one anywhere else in NJ legally, and the mere fact you had one got you arrested? Seems pretty ridiculous right? Now take this situation. From the information currently presented, what is different? But of course we are nowhere near a police state...

Someone needs an education on how renting, and the law in general works.

I thought most PD's did this. I've seen a box of cable locks in multiple police stations in multiple states free for the taking.

I'd almost rather them not do this, just let any orders sit idly in the cue, with any and all orders both before and after going ahead of them. Make them think they are still going to get their stuff.

Call me foolish, but wouldn't the best, and easiest method of figuring out if this is legal or illegal to just look up the actual law/statute? I don't know. Just a thought. NJSA 2C:39

I used to watch commercials and think, what idiots fall for this crap. I'm not going to buy a certain drink just because there are some pretty girls in this commercial! Can't say that anymore. They got me. So I've been drinking some 처음처럼 soju. Damn you sexy 현아! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCebZr-CQAE

Just like we will never get Christians to read the Bible or study world history. You want to say something ignorant and leading, I can to. I thought I read that Vlad grew up in the Communist oppression that was Romania, so I have a fairly good feeling he understands that, and probably better than your or I. Just saying.

This makes me very angry. Glad your daughter was not seriously injured.

Wait, Colorado passed a magazine capacity limit?!?!?!?

I could be mistaken, but I don't think he was blaming anything, just saying that you blaming people not being religious for being the problem, isn't the problem...

With such little to go off of, it leaves a lot open, and I can't think of a better person to epitomize a great fighter of freedom than Dolph Lundgren. Go with Dolph. You, nor your wife, will ever regret it.

Absolutely nothing. I'm thinking Kaiser is just excited about meeting this girl and wanted to share it.

I got to agree. As someone who is not religious, and does not believe in any 'god', I am not so obtuse that I can't understand what someone means if they say 'god given rights'. Call it whatever you feel like. That is semantics. God given, natural, human, unalienable, inalienable, innate, whatever. I tend to think of it as just, you know, surviving, living, or not dieing. But like I said, semantics. Not sure what you would be 'put off' by something you don't even believe in. That is pretty ironic.

Even worse is that despite the 10th Amendment, people seem to think anything NOT in the Constitution can be regulated and legislated, which is exactly incorrect. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Refer to the 9th Amendment to the US Constitution that you are talking about. Despite your claim, that very document says otherwise. "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Not even. A cemetery isn't an exempted location (even if it is your home for the rest of eternity) so there is no way to get a handgun there.

The thread title is a misnomer.

Ostriches I think. Not sure why it has caused such an uproar though. My thread of a similar topic didn't fair as well. http://njgunforums.c...lightless-bird/ Ah! You beat me too it. So glad I wasn't the only one thinking that!

I will give you 18,000x what you paid for it.