Soju

Not too well as it turns out.

Hitler only banned guns from those not considered citizens.

The one exception they left in was that tube fed .22's are okay and the ammunition restriction does NOT apply.

The good news for New Yorkers is they can keep there 10-round magazines loaded with all 10 rounds inside their home and are not guilty of any crime, only a violation. If they happen to get caught, then they can no longer do so without committing a misdemeanor. At least either way it doesn't make them a felon. So if you look at it that way, there is tons of good news!

Any extra form or requirement not specifically listed is specifically illegal. If they required you to fill out a form that turned out to be a page from a children's coloring book it would still be illegal.

It's not. It has become standard for those in a position of consequent free authority to break the law on the regular.

The term itself is another media created term meant to push a political agenda and promote intentional misconceptions.

He said it was long overdue for a rational discussion. Guess he still hasn't checked that book back in yet.

Ahh, very mature. Maybe he should have stuck with his original device before he recanted again. I can't imagine a possible reason he had a temp ban before...

What does 'GFY' stand for?

Can't make it. Would be about a 16 hour flight with about a 3 hour drive on each end.

Did not watch. Don't wish to be subjected so such stupidity I assume was present.

That's exactly my point. Not feasible, practical, or even sensible. That is why it could happen.

I don't have a dog in this fight but you have already moved the goal posts once GF. I'm fairly certain TK wasn't suggesting that all politicians heroes are people like Mao or Guevara, but obviously that does hold true for some. That is all besides the point though.

The government does a lot of things that I wouldn't consider to be anything close to feasible, but they still do it. I wouldn't put a full out ban and confiscation past them...

Odd question to ask. I would think you would know that answer if that was true.

That is disappointing. I was really hoping you were actually one of those things. Bummer.

Seriously? How in the....you must be like some sort of psychic/mind reader/super hero.

I never saw this coming. Complete blindside.

Less 'anti-gun' and more 'hypocrite'.

I thought another difference was also that you cannot take apart the Butler Creek mags but you can take apart the Ruger mags. Is this accurate?

Were there?

Couldn't have been easier.

I absolutely agree. I am not saying it won't be dismissed, ignored, or thought less of, because it absolutely will. I am just saying that regardless, a valid point is a valid point (even if not perceived that way, because in this case, it came from a ranting idiot), just like a worthless argument is still worthless even if it comes from a very well spoken and articulate individual. Arguments SHOULD be taken for their merit and merit alone, and not the source at which it comes by. I'm pretty sure we are all actually agreeing with each other.